General Media Bullshit

[BlueLion. 21,491]

I wouldn't worry about it, Spurs fans won't be the only envious ones when we win the Double again this year.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

A new breed of Chelsea fan has discovered a 'love' for this club in the era when Roman Abramovich's money has backed their ambition, but the Stamford Bridge diehards will confirm that their most cherished of memories following the Blues came long before this somewhat manufactured era.

Agree with that so an extent.

But this is just another typical anti-chelsea article..

"Roman Abramovich bank rolls Chelsea"

"Chelsea can't survive without Roman"

"Chelsea have no youth product"

Here's the facts:

• Yes, Tottenham are doing well. Bale has been an amazing find
• But, Chelsea are already through to the next round of the Champions League
• We sit 5pts clear at the top of the table
• Our youth products are emerging and gradually being integrated into the squad
• Tottenham have spent more than Chelsea, ManUtd & Arsenal in the last 4 years
• Chelsea have not been this quiet in transfer markets since before Scolari back in '08

[Rambo 1,729]

Putting this under media bullshit because I fail to believe this is true.

CaughtOffside report Ancelotti keen on Lahm

You can see why I'd put this under bullshit because WHY would we want to sign Lahm if we have Cole?!

Carlo is probably dead tired from praising Ashley every day, absolute joke how people come up with this stuff.

[Peace. 4,352]

Note that this is supposed to be a match report, and all it talks about is how supposedly Spurs usurped Chelsea's glory this week. Can't miss the jabs at the new supporters and the by now done-to-death 'Russian oil money' gag. Guess the 'reporter' is a closet Sp*rs fan and is afraid to admit it, considering how complete and utter tools fans of that club are known to be. It's a fucking disgrace.

Ow, it's so pathetic... How can people hate Chelsea like this ? They could have at least write one sentence on the game...

Edited November 4, 2010 by killamanjaro

[Madmax 9,219]

Agree with that so an extent.

Won't deny that it is true to an extent. Some of my mates have jumped ship from United to Chelsea after the Double. But it's not fair to paint everyone with the same brush.

[kwylino 329]

I was unlucky enough to wake up And see that piece of SHIT sportsround The only good thing on it was lampard the rest was A poor attempt to knock the Americans and abuse our club

But Anyway Apart from it There was a guy that shows up on motm

He wears a lot of grey and has A tumbleweed on his head And he said were going to get slaughtered by liverpool

Yes slaughtered

WHATAIDIOT

[TIWATZ 64]

I was unlucky enough to wake up And see that piece of SHIT sportsround The only good thing on it was lampard the rest was A poor attempt to knock the Americans and abuse our club

But Anyway Apart from it There was a guy that shows up on motm

He wears a lot of grey and has A tumbleweed on his head And he said were going to get slaughtered by liverpool

Yes slaughtered

WHATAIDIOT

Well he fairly spot on then wasn't he?

[Kez 2,727]

Well he fairly spot on then wasn't he?

45 mins to go......

[Laylabelle 9,539]

If result stays the same...not exactly a slaughter really

[RX8 40]

This articule as many many other About Chelsea Leaving, buying, Offering, Needing, etc.etc... are a Dead time... the only Good thing about it is that those articules feats a Family somewhere in the World... So let´s just Look at that way... And Remember them when we Win More Competitions jajaja

[Term-X 7,891]

Agree with that so an extent.

But this is just another typical anti-chelsea article..

"Roman Abramovich bank rolls Chelsea"

"Chelsea can't survive without Roman"

"Chelsea have no youth product"

Here's the facts:

• Yes, Tottenham are doing well. Bale has been an amazing find
• But, Chelsea are already through to the next round of the Champions League
• We sit 5pts clear at the top of the table
• Our youth products are emerging and gradually being integrated into the squad
• Tottenham have spent more than Chelsea, ManUtd & Arsenal in the last 4 years
• Chelsea have not been this quiet in transfer markets since before Scolari back in '08

:goodpost:

[LDN Blue 7,903]

A stupid Sky News article (yes Sky News, not even SkySPORTS News) making a comparison between Rafa Benitez & Carlo Ancelotti. I'm sorry, but when's the last time Rafa won the double?

http://blogs.news.sky.com/sportslines/Post:e229803b-c859-43bd-8330-606d2d53b407

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Daily Mail says this is the end of Carlo's reign. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1331639/Is-end-Carlo-Ancelotti.html

[Kostas 1,468]

The media and anyone spouting nonsense about Emenalo being Avraam Grant Mark II tend to overlook the fact that CA is a very different man to Mourinho and survived much worse at Milan.

There won't be any reaction from CA's side, we'll just have to hope that the people at the club and Mr.Abramovich have learned something from sacking the previous world class coach we had.

Keeping Ancelotti is as vital as breaking even for the long term future of the club.

[zolayes 14,489]

The media and anyone spouting nonsense about Emenalo being Avraam Grant Mark II tend to overlook the fact that CA is a very different man to Mourinho and survived much worse at Milan.

There won't be any reaction from CA's side, we'll just have to hope that the people at the club and Mr.Abramovich have learned something from sacking the previous world class coach we had.

Keeping Ancelotti is as vital as breaking even for the long term future of the club.

:goodpost: what would be a disaster would be if the board drove Carlo out ...surely Roman can see that.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

There a SkySports feature on Roman's "interference" in the club. It's a bit of an interesting article, written by Paul Smith I think.

"I did a story a while back about the fact that they had reigned in all of the spending at Chelsea because they wanted to break even," said Smith. "They have now got the situation where they are not prepared to spend big money.

"It's been suggested that Abramovich would bankroll a stellar signing but all of the indications are that he is not prepared to do that.

"My belief is that this goes back to last season and the Inter Milan defeat to Jose Mourinho when I think Abramovich blew up and questioned the tactical approach of the team.

"No matter what anybody else says - and they try to play it down - there seems to be this massive obsession with the Champions League with Abramovich."

You can find it here.

"Chelsea wanted to get rid of Steve Clarke when Jose Mourinho was in charge and Jose said 'fine, if he goes I go' and that was the end of it."

[Kostas 1,468]

^Interesting view,can't comment on it at the moment but I'll keep arguing that it was proven just a few months ago that Abramovich is willing to fund big transfers.

In case anyone reads something about Ancelotti offering his resignation and Chelsea rejecting, it's just a Twitter rumor that started out of nothing.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Ffs.

Daily Mail and Telegraph saying we're looking to hire Guardiola at the end of the season, hence firing Carlo.

>.<

[warnie_666 1,081]

With that Bergistan or whoever coming to us these rumours will last for a long time now. Media makes assumptions. Its no rocket science.

[Kostas 1,468]

Daily Mail and Telegraph saying we're looking to hire Guardiola at the end of the season, hence firing Carlo.

Lazy journalism