Luka Modric

[Jose M 140]

Never in a millions YEARS

[BLionheart 516]

He's an ugly spurs scum gremlin like creature who would demand ridiculous wages.

Better players are available if roman is going to splash the cash, such as Hamsik from napoli.

+1

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Great player.

Who cares if he's ugly and plays for Spurs, would you turn down Messi or Xavi or David Villa if they'd have played for Spurs? Some of the things you read on this forum are laughable. Dedication to your club is one thing, but blind loyalties are just hilarious.

[Badboy 1,526]

I do not understand the hate towards luka he is a top footballer. Luka is extremely creative and he has brilliant ball control, he would give us a different option in midfield.

[Madmax 9,219]

Not here to build a team of good looking models are we? I mean Drogba's one ugly bastard - nobody complains about that !

On topic :

It's never going to happen. Spurs aren't going to sell us their best player for 30 mil like the report claims. He's easily a 50 mil player when you look at the prices involved in other deals.

[Peace. 4,352]

We're not Real Madrid. So I don't give a flying fuck if our players can't work for Dior as a supermodels...

I would love to see him play for us, he only can make us better... But it won't happen.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

We're not Real Madrid. So I don't give a flying fuck if our players can't work for Dior as a supermodels...

I would love to see him play for us, he only can make us better... But it won't happen.

I'd actually say Real have got one ugly team Them lot make me look moderately attractive (if you've had a few (hundred) pints).

I agree, though, it simply won't happen. Over the years Spurs have been a buy-and-sell-for-a-profit club. We've seen that with the likes of Carrick (they made a £16 million profit on him ). But now they're a team who want to keep their best players, and good players should now be going to them as well.

[Term-X 7,891]

Modric Hamsik

[Styles 9,790]

We were heavily linked with him before Spurs signed him. It’s a shame that we didn't take the punt on him then because he has developed into a very decent player and would have been extremely useful to this Chelsea side.

As much as I think he would be a decent signing there are two things going against him; his price and his Tottenham affiliation. He would cost a silly sum way above his ability as a footballer. And considering the best price we could negotiate for Ramires was £18m I don’t trust our club to get a good deal.

Also I prefer when we sign players who can create their name with Chelsea and not come here as an established player from a rival club.

[Madmax 9,219]

Also I prefer when we sign players who can create their name with Chelsea and not come here as an established player from a rival club.

Look at your ava

[Styles 9,790]

Look at your ava

Ashley is one of those rare cases which make signing a player from a rival club a good thing. He is the best in the world in his position and he f*cks up the Arsenal every time we play them. :champions:

[DYC. 7,542]

because he has developed into a very decent player

Wow, that's a great example of understatement .

[LDN Blue 7,903]

He's an ugly spurs scum gremlin like creature who would demand ridiculous wages.

Better players are available if roman is going to splash the cash, such as Hamsik from napoli.

Couldn't agree more, from what I've seen Hamsik is on his way to becoming better than Modric.

[DYC. 7,542]

Luka Modric is a genius and has made his name in the Premier League. Hamsik still has a lot to prove.

Btw there's no use in comparing the two players since they're two completely different players. Hamsik is a goal-scoring midfielder and Modric is a playmaker that makes a team play better. So it really depends on what a club/manager is looking for. You could even sign both and play them together.

[Styles 9,790]

Wow, that's a great example of understatement .

Well that is what he is imo. He isn't the best player in the World and I personally think we can do better.