West Ham 0-3 Chelsea

[Stats 7,056]

4 hours ago, Mhsc said:

Don't understand the Kudus hype. Never Chelsea quality. Summerville looked interesting though.

I thought Kudus and Summerville looked very only good players. Kudus is inconsistent but he is a very good player. I just think West Ham have a lot of attackers but haven't figured out what to do at the moment. Their fans booed when Summerville came up.

[robsblubot 3,504]

Really odd game by WHU. I know Jackson is very pacey, prob the fastest striker in the PL, but that first goal was embarrassing... 3+ WHU players jogging back lazily while Jackson is in a full sprint... it was hilarious unless you are a ham's fan or their manager.

With that said, the second goal was class; great ball by Caicedo and an even better "outside of the foot" finish by Jackson. That finish says one thing to me: confidence.

Contrary to most here I thought Enzo did well. Cuccu moving inside worked well once against giving solidity to the center midfield. It's all adjustment from here and you can see how compact the team tries to be. The 3-player passing from the back is still very erratic, but it's actually good to see the manager isn't forcing this.

The one thing I wasn't crazy about was Fofana. He miscontrolled the football a few times and did grab WH player which looked like a penalty to me.

I understand the argument that the hold wasn't enough to bring the player to the ground, but wasn't it enough to prevent the player from reaching the football? I wasn't crazy about the theatrics there, but the player was held which prevented him from continuing the play.