Enzo Maresca Thread

[TheHulk 2,513]

We deserve him to stay at least 10 more years by how delusional our fanbase is. Many were sucking him dry after CWC pretending he did some masterclass.

He is shit and won't change anytime soon, I've said it before this squad isn't that good but this idiot is making it look worse than it is.

Edited 18 hours ago by TheHulk

[NikkiCFC 8,383]

Did he said how we learned lesson?

[Blue Armour 4,481]

Not admitting to his mistake in the post match.

Just going on about how Old Trafford away is tough for any club. As if we were facing off against Ferguson's United.

"The reason we removed Pedro & Estavao, is because they attack with 5 players always, and we defend with 4. We can defend with 4, when its 11 v 11. But 11 v 10, we need width and a back 5."

Sure, but why not change anything for 30 mins after they went down to 10 men.

Mahlo was apparently brought on for Garnacho because, Garnacho was tired, lol.

[Special Juan 28,204]

Blokes a fucking clown I'm sick and tired of him and these fucking idiots at the top of the club

From Maresca's shit line ups to not buying a top class striker and top class keeper you are watching the house of cards like we all predicted happen right in front of our eyes.

[Stats 7,158]

Definitely seems to be trying to make a point by bringing on George and not playing our new signings. Seems this is his obvious way of saying, you forced me into this, so this is what I am doing in return. He made it clear that it was board decision to part with Jackson. Why would he bring on George again when he looks so uncomfortable up top and he was meant to go Fulham. Just bizarre. Apart from that Fulham game when he came on and scored last season, he has not looked comfortable up front at all. So yeah, odd from Maresca for keep trying him up there.

[DDA 10,001]

2 hours ago, Stats said:

Definitely seems to be trying to make a point by bringing on George and not playing our new signings. Seems this is his obvious way of saying, you forced me into this, so this is what I am doing in return. He made it clear that it was board decision to part with Jackson. Why would he bring on George again when he looks so uncomfortable up top and he was meant to go Fulham. Just bizarre. Apart from that Fulham game when he came on and scored last season, he has not looked comfortable up front at all. So yeah, odd from Maresca for keep trying him up there.

If he is playing George up top because of the goal vs Fulham then he should be sacked immediately and never employed again.

[Reddish-Blue 2,520]

2 hours ago, Stats said:

Why would he bring on George again when he looks so uncomfortable up top and he was meant to go Fulham. Just bizarre. Apart from that Fulham game when he came on and scored last season, he has not looked comfortable up front at all. So yeah, odd from Maresca for keep trying him up there.

Wasn't he asked the same question in one of the previous games and I'm pretty sure he responded with something like George needed minutes more than Guiu or something along those lines. 

Alot of his decisions recently seem quite poor. 

Like with Palmer today, if he wasn't ready to go, why start with him and potentially make his injury worse? 

[DDA 10,001]

45 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said:

Wasn't he asked the same question in one of the previous games and I'm pretty sure he responded with something like George needed minutes more than Guiu or something along those lines. 

Alot of his decisions recently seem quite poor. 

Like with Palmer today, if he wasn't ready to go, why start with him and potentially make his injury worse? 

Why was The Argie on loan ready on the bench if you know Palmer has a groin problem? Isn’t he meant to be there for that very reason? He must be pissed that we didn’t get Xavi or Fermin.. it’s the only explanation.