Raheem Sterling

[LAM09 6,792]

28 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

What gives you this impression? The fact he took a shot instead of passing? Fuck sake I am sorry but that is an absolutely ridiculous take 😂

I have no problem with someone willing to try and take responsibility and take a shot in a position where they perhaps could of passed or whatever. It is actually refreshing as I am sick of watching the likes of Jackson, Mudryk, Broja etc all trying to pass it instead of actually having the balls to shoot. It doesn’t make me think he’s above the rest or anything ridiculous along those lines which again I have seen in here. 

If he isn’t an elite player then what about the other £1bn of players we have signed? Barring Palmer and to a lesser extent Raheem, they’ve all done next to nothing. Even World Cup winner £106m Enzo Fernandez has looked well beyond average this season and his body language for me looks a huge issue also. Just half arsing games. But nobody mentioning that - as if we are lucky to have him despite being anonymous for months.

Also on Sterling, why has Poch asked him to try and play more like he did 10 years ago? Why not continue to utilise him as Pep did at City, getting into the box, scoring goals? He has such a good record in arguably the best offensive teams in modern PL history. But yeah ask him to take the ball 40m and then not get in the box?

Nkunku and Sterling are the closest/only top/elite proven attacking players we have at the moment. Simple as that. Even top or elite players, we don’t have very many. Silva is slowing down so he is maybe not there anymore but he could be there as would Reece & Ben perhaps. The rest the jury is out. 

What blows my mind is people jump on Sterlings back after one little moment in one game but will sit there saying the likes of Mudryk needs time, “will come good” and he is a project when he is about to turn 23 years old and fucking hopeless.

Some of you need your heads checked.

There's a host of examples of him making the wrong decision in favour of himself, not just the most recent one that lost us a point at the very least. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he try to take the ball from Palmer for a PK (which might have been against City).

If you have the "balls" to take a shot on, you better score or be prepared for the backlash. He's our highest-paid player by some distance, which is farcical in itself. I have even touched upon his diving antics, which make me dislike him even more.

People jump on Sterling's back because he should know better at 29 compared to Mudryk. I'd get shot of him in a heartbeat were the Saudi teams to put in an offer for him. 

[Vincent 402]

 

[Johnnyeye 7,445]

bottler

[Vesper 29,039]

Get this berk off the team.

Stealing a living.

https://salarysport.com/football/player/raheem-sterling/

Career Earnings:
Year    Weekly Wage    Yearly Salary    Club    Position    League    Age    Contract Expiry
2024    £350,000    £18,200,000    Chelsea    AM RL    Premier League    28    30-06-2027
2023    £350,000    £18,200,000    Chelsea    AM RL    Premier League    27    30-06-2027
2022    £300,000    £15,600,000    Manchester City    AM RL    Premier League    26    30-06-2023
2021    £200,000    £10,400,000    Manchester City    M/AM    Premier League    25    30-06-2023
2020    £200,000    £10,400,000    Manchester City    AM RL    Premier League    24    30-06-2023
2019    £200,000    £10,400,000    Manchester City    AM RL    Premier League    23    30-06-2023
2018    £150,000    £7,800,000    Manchester City    AM RLC    Premier League    22    30-06-2020
2017    £150,000    £7,800,000    Manchester City    AM RLC, F C    Premier League    21    29-06-2020
2016    £150,000    £7,800,000    Manchester City

Edited March 16 by Vesper

[NikkiCFC 8,060]

On 10/07/2022 at 17:39, NikkiCFC said:

Diver, never rated him. His goals in City are just tap ins so his numbers don't show anything. What is he good at exactly? Put him in Palace, would not score 5 goals in a season. Zaha is for example way superior player. Would say I even prefer Pulisic and Ziyech over him. Not to mention his antics. 

I can already see what kind of comments are we going to see because Sterling is not creative player and cannot create for himself either. 

...

[Vesper 29,039]

Raheem Sterling at Chelsea: A marquee signing incapable of living up to an unrealistic billing

https://theathletic.com/5352265/2024/03/20/sterling-Chelsea-england-city-liverpool/

The ball had not even landed yet in the upper tier of the Matthew Harding Stand when the boos began to rain down.

Raheem Sterling stood still and raised his hands to cover his mouth and nose, trying to process how his Roberto Carlos-style run-up had resulted in a free-kick attempt more akin to a failed rugby union conversion. Patson Daka, jogging upfield having been in the Leicester City wall, even offered a consoling ruffle of his opponent’s head as he went past.

Then, as Sterling slowly turned away, the chant went up from the Chelsea supporters behind him.

“Get him off! Get him off! Get him off!”

It was one of those rare moments on a football pitch where high comedy meets excruciating embarrassment, an extinction-level event for the confidence of some players. Fernando Torres experienced something similar at Old Trafford in September 2011, contriving to miss an open goal in front of a gleeful Stretford End after brilliantly rounding David de Gea.

That day, however, Torres only had to endure the taunts of rival supporters. Chelsea fans overwhelmingly stuck with him, sympathetic to his plight and appreciative of his effort. Sterling, despite belonging in the same bracket of disappointing marquee signings, has always been treated differently by a vocal section of the club’s hardcore support.

A perception has grown among his fiercest critics at Stamford Bridge that Sterling is a selfish player, putting his success ahead of the team’s best interests. His decision to ask Cole Palmer to hand over penalty duties against Leicester City was widely interpreted as proof, adding to a body of evidence that also includes him shooting rather than squaring to Palmer or Nicolas Jackson when through on goal in Chelsea’s 2-1 loss to Wolverhampton Wanderers at Molineux in December.

But another interpretation makes more sense within the context of Sterling’s career as a whole: that he is tying himself in knots trying to live up to his own expectations and those of everyone around him.

Hype has followed Sterling since the start of his football journey; a gift and a curse.

The subject of interest from England’s top clubs before signing for Liverpool at 15, his thrilling breakthrough to become a Premier League regular and senior England international at 17 marked him out as the Michael Owen or Wayne Rooney of his generation.

That almost impossible standard became even more daunting when he moved from Liverpool to Manchester City in 2015 for an initial £44million ($55.9m) fee that made him the most expensive English player ever at the time, simultaneously branded a money-grabbing mercenary before his 21st birthday and the man to power a golden era at the Etihad Stadium.

In reality, he was neither, but Sterling was so desperate to succeed after an underwhelming first two seasons at City that he reinvented his game under Pep Guardiola, transforming from a direct wing-hugging dribbler into an expert finisher of moves in the penalty area. That change also helped him escape the unwanted status of designated scapegoat for England’s tournament failures, instead blossoming into one of Gareth Southgate’s most reliable performers.

Announcing his arrival at Chelsea in the summer of 2022, co-owner Todd Boehly described Sterling as a “world-class talent”. The forward spoke sincerely about his ambition to win the Ballon d’Or — words that seemed fanciful at the time and now appear utterly ludicrous, but are also entirely consistent with the mindset that has taken him to this point.

Sterling was football’s equivalent of a Hollywood child star, growing up publicly in a storm of often unfair criticism and, at times, disgraceful media coverage while attempting to live up to the excitement sparked by his prodigious emergence. Rather than going off the rails, he doubled down on his professionalism and, along the way, held up a vital mirror to the racially charged manner in which some UK newspapers discussed him and other young black footballers.

That is quite a legacy to add to what Chelsea head coach Mauricio Pochettino justifiably describes as “an unbelievable CV”: four Premier League titles, 10 major club trophies overall and 20 goals in 82 England appearances. Sterling does not turn 30 until December, yet Rooney is the only forward to have played more than his 27,896 minutes in the Premier League.

The problem for Sterling and everyone else invested in his success is that he has never been a Ballon d’Or-level performer. He lacks the metronomic precision and production of the very best and the unfortunate tendency of his generally excellent technique to desert him at key moments can make him a uniquely maddening watch.

Guardiola’s system elevated Sterling to career-best heights, but he was never as integral to its success as some of his more celebrated City team-mates. That is why he lost his place as a regular starter a year before leaving for Chelsea and why the Premier League champions were ultimately fine with selling him to an ostensible rival two years ago.

In the eyes of Thomas Tuchel, Sterling was the versatile scoring threat he needed to transform an underperforming attack. To the owners, he was a marquee name who could be unveiled with a glitzy Beverly Hills photoshoot and justifiably paid at the level of a Premier League superstar. This fundamental misidentification of what Sterling was might have doomed his Chelsea chapter at its conception.

His huge contract, which pays him at a comparable level to Mohamed Salah and Kevin De Bruyne and contains no clauses to lower his salary outside of European competition, informs a lot of the frustration that comes his way from inside and outside the club. It is telling that he was the one singled out for motivation by Boehly during the American’s ill-advised visit to Stamford Bridge’s home dressing room after the defeat against Brighton & Hove Albion in April.

None of this is Sterling’s fault and there is no suggestion that securing such a lucrative five-year deal has prompted him to take his foot off the gas. On the contrary, he spent much of last summer working with Chelsea staff to re-think his approach to diet and nutrition and threw himself into extra conditioning work to ensure he would be in peak shape for the new season, which he began impressively under Pochettino.

“I want to get back to being obsessed with football and nothing else,” he said in August. “Top performances, goals and assists. A lot has happened in my career. I have had a new challenge, which has been difficult. Your head can become blurry, but my love for football is too much and I am too young to let my career fizzle out.

“I need to maintain the standards I have set myself and keep going. I have the desire and hunger to do that.”

Sterling’s production since that pledge has fallen short of his and Chelsea’s standards. His goal against City at the Etihad Stadium last month was only his second in 2024 and ended a three-month scoring drought in the Premier League. He has not added to it in the five matches across all competitions that followed.

Given the huge mileage of his career, Sterling’s slump has fuelled suggestions that he has entered his decline phase. In terms of playing style at Chelsea, he has reverted more to what he was at Liverpool than what he became at City; he ranks third in the Premier League for dribbles attempted per 90 minutes in 2023-24, but his success rate is the lowest in the top 10.

Sterling is a low-efficiency dribbler

PLAYER	DRIBBLES/90	DRIBBLE SUCCESS (%)
Jérémy Doku	9.3	51.60%
Mohammed Kudus	7.5	55.00%
Raheem Sterling	6	33.30%
Kaoru Mitoma	5.7	41.50%
Chiedozie Ogbene	5.5	50.90%
Leon Bailey	5.4	48.30%
Gabriel Martinelli	5.4	34.60%
Pedro Neto	5.3	42.00%
Simon Adingra	5.2	41.00%
Matheus Cunha	5.1	47.30%

Sterling’s high volume, low efficiency dribbling this season also compares unfavourably with all of his final five seasons working with Guardiola at City.

 

Sterling's dribble efficiency has dipped

SEASON	DRIBBLES/90	DRIBBLE SUCCESS (%)
2017-18	4.2	53.80%
2018-19	4.9	53.90%
2019-20	3.6	52.30%
2020-21	4.3	54.10%
2021-22	4.8	47.30%
2022-23	4.4	41.90%
2023-24	6	33.30%

The bad moments are beginning to outnumber the good ones and, as has so often been the case in Sterling’s career, in his bad moments for Chelsea he is discovering that he has very little credit in the bank with many of his own supporters.

---

History suggests that Sterling will not give up.

For all his flaws, it is hard to find a more mentally resilient footballer — a quality underlined again by the run and inviting low cross that gave Palmer a tap-in against Leicester, following hot on the heels of his limp penalty and gilt-edged one-on-one miss in a torrid first half. He does not hide, even if that means enduring moments like his unforgettable second-half free kick.

That attitude is one of the things that endears him to his team-mates, who notably rushed to issue supportive comments under his apologetic Instagram post after the Leicester game.

Sterling was never a candidate for the Chelsea captaincy, but he is viewed as a big brother by many of the club’s younger attackers; an example to follow in terms of his application.

https://www.instagram.com/p/C4n8N7nN2P_/

Receiving such love from any of the supporters he has represented seems an unlikely prospect.

Liverpool will never forgive him for leaving. The bulk of the adulation at City is reserved for the club’s unequivocal modern club legends: Vincent Kompany, David Silva, Yaya Toure, Sergio Aguero and De Bruyne. England supporters often seemed more comfortable abusing than embracing him. All three responded to his absence by quickly finding newer, shinier heroes.

Then there is this Chelsea chapter, which grows unhappier by the month.

Sterling is not capable of living up to the initial billing. For many in the stands, his face does not fit this young team and his contract — which runs until June 2027 — is an expensive millstone, the legacy of a chaotic first transfer window before Boehly and Clearlake Capital implemented their youth strategy and drive to lower the wage bill.

On the current direction of travel, it would be a sad end to a highly successful and admirable career, but perhaps the reaction to Sterling’s eventual substitution against Leicester hints at the only workable way forward: applause drowning out the boos, reciprocated by the man himself.

In the absence of love, respect will do.

 

 

 

 

[Mhsc 922]

Sorry for the bad screenshot... Sky sports saying Raheem spent more time walking than any other forward in the premier league this season.

[robsblubot 3,537]

1 minute ago, Mhsc said:

Sorry for the bad screenshot... Sky sports saying Raheem spent more time walking than any other forward in the premier league this season.

From a hard-working player at City to this. 😞

[Vesper 29,039]

On 20/05/2024 at 20:27, Mhsc said:

Sorry for the bad screenshot... Sky sports saying Raheem spent more time walking than any other forward in the premier league this season.

[TheHulk 1,892]

Terminate his contract!

[Vesper 29,039]

44 minutes ago, TheHulk said:

Terminate his contract!

 

[Thor 2,442]

Hazard was > Neymar at his best. 

[Magic Lamps 11,677]

Sell him. He is useless on the pitch and apparently also knows fk all about football in general.
Not a fan of either but Messi > Ronaldo simply bc of the WC. 
 
but more importantly 
Lampard > slippy G. It’s not even a contest. the only reason there is a debate is bc of lpools annoying popularity . I know  Sterling and slippy g played together but still get a grip 

Lamps has more goals (absolute or per game or minutes, from outside or inside the box, it does not matter ) more assists,  more club trophies, more individual honors

plus gerrard singlehandedly cost pool the title in 2014 and England progress in the WC the same year plus countless other fuck ups that cost his teams, far more than the number of usual errors that just happen. Not bc he was psychotic but bc slippy g simply was technically out of his depth in many situations. Lampard was just so much cleaner with the ball at his feet and overall the superior footballer.  

[NikkiCFC 8,060]

Informed on Friday about not being involved = realise the statement one hour before the game. What a cunt. 

[robsblubot 3,537]

40 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Informed on Friday about not being involved = realise the statement one hour before the game. What a cunt. 

Yup. Sounds like an agent play alright. They are likely sitting on the contract and don't want to move.

On 19/07/2024 at 05:57, Magic Lamps said:

Sell him. He is useless on the pitch and apparently also knows fk all about football in general.
Not a fan of either but Messi > Ronaldo simply bc of the WC. 
 
but more importantly 
Lampard > slippy G. It’s not even a contest. the only reason there is a debate is bc of lpools annoying popularity . I know  Sterling and slippy g played together but still get a grip 

Lamps has more goals (absolute or per game or minutes, from outside or inside the box, it does not matter ) more assists,  more club trophies, more individual honors

plus gerrard singlehandedly cost pool the title in 2014 and England progress in the WC the same year plus countless other fuck ups that cost his teams, far more than the number of usual errors that just happen. Not bc he was psychotic but bc slippy g simply was technically out of his depth in many situations. Lampard was just so much cleaner with the ball at his feet and overall the superior footballer.  

Sorry for necroing this, but I will never understand Messi vs CR7 comparisons as they are completely different players who thrived in different positions. Personally Messi is one of the best players I saw in my life, and I saw Maradona (to a lesser degree), and Ronaldo (9) before and after he lost both knees: before he was more like Messi (he was everywhere on the pitch), while after he was more like CR7 as he became more of a pure, and yet skillful, striker.

On 17/07/2024 at 17:18, Thor said:

Hazard was > Neymar at his best. 

He really wasn't. Eden was always a bit of a one-trick pony, even if a fantastic one. He also struggled too much in CL: you really can't find a great performance from him in the later stages of CL, while Neymar had plenty.
Neymar has more skill and creativity, and is also a better finisher too. Eden was better at dribbling and had more pace, but ultimately a less complete player for me.

They were both very similar in one regard though: even if for completely different reasons, their lack of dedication reduced them as players both in quality as well as longevity.

Edited August 18 by robsblubot

[OneMoSalah 8,788]

32 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Informed on Friday about not being involved = realise the statement one hour before the game. What a cunt. 

I think the statement was wrong. Particularly with the timing yes. Was it his idea or his teams idea to release it then though? Who knows? Both should know better though. 

I can see why he would be frustrated. He was told he was a part of Maresca’s plans when pre-season started and maybe a week ago, if the rumors are true, the club offered him to Juventus in a swap deal for Chiesa… that and leaving him out, maybe put some wheels in motion in his mind. Its pretty obvious the club are looking to shift multiple players on.

I know I keep going on about the new owners and the 2 clowns running the show but this sort of thing wouldn’t have happened under the previous regime. Just like the Gallagher and Trevor situations and them being expelled from the first team and the facilities. There is a real sense of uncertainty and a bit of toxicity around how players are being treated at the club and it definitely has came from the top. 

These owners and footballing director guys are making Maresca’s job a nightmare from day 1 with this shit. Its not like he has publicly said about Raheem its best if he leaves like he did with Chilwell. He is answering more questions on things he cannot control as opposed to the most important thing: coaching. 

 

Edited August 18 by OneMoSalah

[Magic Lamps 11,677]

Moronic idea from him to have this statement released. We have 42 players in the squad. A good 20 had to be left out, where are the other guys statements? You don’t play? Just get on with it.  
 

the timing just before the game was an act of sabotage.

as Maresca apparently sees nkunku and Neto as LW, Sterling is now our 3rd choice LW. You can’t have your 3rd choice complain every time he isn’t in the squad. Reminds me of that story when steve warnock complained about Benitez not telling him in advance he would not play in the CL final 2005. 
I hope Maresca told Sterling  that he didn’t inform the kitman he would not start as CF either 

[DH1988 1,317]

Sums up Raheem and his camp, no issues with him leaving the club, at all.