Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Pizy said:

If we pay more than £35m for Garnacho we’re getting massively ripped off. Mason Mount levels of scamming us like we did them.

 

Watch us pay over 45m and Clearlake dickriders will come and say we didn't overpay for such a talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheHulk said:

Watch us pay over 45m and Clearlake dickriders will come and say we didn't overpay for such a talent.

 

2 minutes ago, Mário César said:

I think the fee will be 40M or 45M pounds. Something like that...

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we'll either get Garnacho for around 26m upfront with upto 10m in bonuses.

Or a Sancho type deal.

Not what Man Ure might want but we should play hardball as they need to shift him more than we need to buy him.

We can easily walk away and stick with "Evil Saka".

I think main reason we looking at Garnacho is because of the good deal they think we can get for him.if that's not the case we'll walk away..

Edited by Duppy Conqueror
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Duppy Conqueror said:

I think we'll either get Garnacho for around 26m upfront with upto 10m in bonuses.

Or a Sancho type deal.

Not what Man Ure might want but we should play hardball as they need to shift him more than we need to buy him.

We can easily walk away and stick with "Evil Saka".

I think main reason we looking at Garnacho is because of the good deal they think we can get for him.if that's not the case we'll walk away..

A sancho job where they pay half his wages and then we pay to send him home after hes crap and cant get past even my nan ideal! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garnacho was always spoken about by these reporters as basically a “bonus” signing at the very end after we’ve already secured Xavi and whichever other priority signings. That’s why it almost didn’t seem as bad.

But if we’re now pushing ahead with him before Xavi it tells me that it’s Simons that was actually the one we’ll move for if the price is right but isn’t a priority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Garnacho was always spoken about by these reporters as basically a “bonus” signing at the very end after we’ve already secured Xavi and whichever other priority signings. That’s why it almost didn’t seem as bad.

But if we’re now pushing ahead with him before Xavi it tells me that it’s Simons that was actually the one we’ll move for if the price is right but isn’t a priority.

Yeah thats what everyones been thinking

If hes cheap or loan ill accept it but Simons is the goose we want

Elliott I would of liked but Simons as good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You