Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Hashishi said:

I think he would be better than Kepa and would be a good buy. Either Kepa or Mendy are leaving this summer.

Oblak

or if not him

Illan Meslier

or maybe

Dominik Livakovic

or

Slonina is a freak of nature becomes teen GKer wonder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, TheHulk said:

And that goes to shove it to the Arsenal fans and co who said he went for money. The truth is he cares about football and I understand why he wanted to move to the Gunners initially. They messed about and thought they could low-ball Shakhtar and undermined them in the process and he got sold. If it was about money, he would have pressed for a lot more. Arsenal's failure to get him was there piure dilly-dallying about which allowed us to pounce. Love this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

I severely doubt it. Whats the source for this?

Speculations that since the debt has been paid, what ever the amount the player is sold above their book value is considered a profit in accounting/FFP terms, but 100% of the transfer fee will be utilized as cash on hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

Speculations that since the debt has been paid, what ever the amount the player is sold above their book value is considered a profit in accounting/FFP terms, but 100% of the transfer fee will be utilized as cash on hand.

And what happened to money from sale? All went to Ukraine? I read also somewhere that 1.75b is already planned for stadium. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jype said:

What's the excuse for the latter being consistently worse?

Playing with Mount 😂

On a serious note both Mount and Havartz gave us nothing last season and a half. CL run is still best thing you can say about them. At least Kai didn't do so much damage like Mount who is number one reason we lost both Cup finals last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

£65-75m is a hell of a lot for Caicedo. Can probably get someone with his exact profile for a whole lot less.

But I can see us pulling the trigger. Knows and has worked under Potter, we seemingly have a good relationship with Brighton, and he’s in a position of serious need. He also perfectly matches the sort of signing Boehly and Vivell have desired. Early 20’s and can be put on a long contract and “grow with the project.”

Always going to be a price premium when you’re buying in January and especially from a fellow PL club who don’t actually want to sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

For sure the deal will be done. Around 2 more weeks of transfer window and we already offered 65m. So just 10m difference. We can put adds one, player on loan etc... 

waste of money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arsenal target Moussa Diaby would be “perfect” for Mikel Arteta’s side, says Christian Falk.

https://www.givemesport.com/88105639-arsenal-mykhailo-mudryk-alternative-emirates-transfer-news

However, the BILD journalist has told GiveMeSport that he is likely to cost the same amount of money as Mykhailo Mudryk, who recently joined Chelsea.

Arsenal transfer news – Moussa Diaby

According to Sky Sport, Arsenal are looking at alternatives to Mudryk and have identified Diaby as one.

The Gunners missed out on the 22-year-old, who signed for their London rivals Chelsea in an £88.5m deal last Sunday, as reported by Sky Sports.

Arteta must now consider other names if he still wants to sign a new winger this month, and Diaby appears to be one the Spaniard currently has in mind.

You suspect, though, that Bayer Leverkusen are going to do all they can to keep the Frenchman, who is one of their best players, at the club this winter.

What has Christian Falk said about Moussa Diaby and Arsenal?

Falk thinks Diaby would be ideal for Arsenal but says Leverkusen would probably ask for €100m (around £88m) for the 23-year-old.

Speaking to GMS, the BILD journalist, who also writes for CaughtOffside, said: “If they give Diaby to Arsenal, he would be a perfect player because they didn’t get the other one. But he’s really in the same range, €70m plus €30m, which Chelsea paid for Mudryk.

“Arsenal said we couldn’t pay that, so I’m not sure if they get Diaby if that’s the amount they can’t pay.”

Will Arsenal sign Moussa Diaby this month?

Diaby really does look like a good alternative to Mudryk. Last season, he scored 13 goals and provided 12 assists in 32 Bundesliga appearances, as per Transfermarkt.

As for the current campaign, the France international has registered nine goal contributions in the league so far and an average of 1.9 key passes per game, which is the highest in Leverkusen’s squad, according to WhoScored.

If Arsenal were unwilling to pay £88m for their primary target Mudryk, though, it is hard to imagine them spending that on an alternative. Shakhtar Donetsk chief executive Sergei Palkin, however, has told The Athletic that their offer was similar to Chelsea’s but differed when it came to things like bonuses.

At that price, the Gunners will probably not be signing Diaby in this transfer window. But if Leverkusen are open to accepting less and their English counterparts end up striking a deal with them, as the above shows, he could bring a lot to the Emirates.

It is perhaps one to watch, but getting the former Paris Saint-Germain man out of the BayArena this month looks like an extremely difficult task.

  •  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...