Chelsea Transfers

[Mário César 1,033]

4 minutes ago, Blues Forever said:

 

what that means?

[Blues Forever 1,232]

4 minutes ago, Mário César said:

what that means?

It's pretty clear, look at his tweet no fee agreed for Sterling. 

[whats happening 1,538]

5 hours ago, DH1988 said:

Bowen would be such a better fit for us, just a shame he costs West Ham tax ie. They want five times his actual worth.

Ake has regressed since going to City, always had potential, but that was it.

city fans say that ake was really good for them.

[MoroccanBlue 5,320]

This constant speculation talk can drive a man insane. 

[DDA 9,696]

1 minute ago, MoroccanBlue said:

This constant speculation talk can drive a man insane. 

We're all feeling it man. It's painful. Next week there just has to be at least one completed transfer. Surely.

[ZAPHOD2319 4,534]

About to pay Man City to compete with us for de Ligt.

 

[MoroccanBlue 5,320]

3 minutes ago, DDA said:

We're all feeling it man. It's painful. Next week there just has to be at least one completed transfer. Surely.

Was convinced we’d sign both Sterling and de Ligt this week. 
 

A fools hope. 

[Pizy 18,487]

7 minutes ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

About to pay Man City to compete with us for de Ligt.

 

You’d hope de Ligt would prefer to walk right into our first XI as a key player than to go to City and rotate with Laporte and Stones. City would be a stupid move for him.

United are the ones we have to worry about I think. Luckily, it seems they’re currently after that dwarf from Ajax.

[ZAPHOD2319 4,534]

12 minutes ago, Pizy said:

You’d hope de Ligt would prefer to walk right into our first XI as a key player than to go to City and rotate with Laporte and Stones. City would be a stupid move for him.

United are the ones we have to worry about I think. Luckily, it seems they’re currently after that dwarf from Ajax.

I think United have a budget to stay in. They have a lot of wage on their back line and nobody is leaving.

[turgi 71]

100m for Ake and Sterling.

We might as well send the money straight to Juventus and De Ligt will go to City.

 This is turning into such an embarrassment.

[DDA 9,696]

32 minutes ago, Pizy said:

You’d hope de Ligt would prefer to walk right into our first XI as a key player than to go to City and rotate with Laporte and Stones. City would be a stupid move for him.

United are the ones we have to worry about I think. Luckily, it seems they’re currently after that dwarf from Ajax.

Don't forget Ruben Dias too. 

[Blue Armour 4,325]

If the paper talk is true, and Inter are willing to give us a special preference over Skriniar (they better do after that Lukaku fiasco), we should just go for it. 

Comes across as a MUCH more exciting player compared to De Ligt, and could bring back the energy we will miss in defense from Rudiger 

Edited July 2, 2022 by Blue Armour

[chelsea_4_eva 1,162]

5 hours ago, Blues Forever said:

 

Reckon they would be interested with an Alonso and/or Azpi + cash for him?

[Special Juan 27,492]

De Ligt ain't going to City.

[YorkshireBlue 3,126]

Are people really suggesting that we are "giving city money for de ligt" that's hilarious. Yes because without or 50m for sterling they could never afford him. Lmfao.

[Blues Forever 1,232]

 

[YorkshireBlue 3,126]

18 minutes ago, Blues Forever said:

 

How has this fraud not left yet.

[Magic Lamps 11,677]

I know it’s infuriating but the club is a ship almost without captain atm

complete clear out at the director and board level, no continuity rule in place. Obviously Todd has to reestablish all the contacts while also getting a crash course in football dealings. It’s pretty much chaos up there right now so I don’t expect anything to be done quickly and more embarrassments like Ake and Raphinha incoming.