Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

I still do t see how Liverpool getting Isak makes any sense after they’ve signed Ekitike for £80m. Isak starts every PL and UCL match if he’s fit. So they’re going to have an £80m striker who just arrived sitting on the bench most games? It’s nonsensical. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mkh said:

BREAKING: Alexander Isak has informed Newcastle of his desire to explore a move this summer.

Club aware of player’s plans and will now decide how to move, as @CraigHope_DM reports.

Newcastle have already re-started exploring a move for a top striker in the market.

Jackson to Newcastle

Use Jackson money to buy Rogers

What a dream. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LFC told Newcastle prior to signing Hugo Ekitike they were prepared to pay a British transfer record fee. Another attacker is still possible for Liverpool if Luis Diaz is sold, and with Darwin Nunez expected to leave. Another approach is not ruled out.

Hilal have told Newcastle they are ready to make a significant offer despite no engagement yet on player side. Isak has not shown encouragement to Saudi so far.

(Ben Jacobs)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isak going to Liverpool doesn’t even bother me at this point tbh. I kind of view it like when City were completely dominating in recent years and still adding top quality players. They were already a 10/10 attacking team so what does adding another star actually do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Isak going to Liverpool doesn’t even bother me at this point tbh. I kind of view it like when City were completely dominating in recent years and still adding top quality players. They were already a 10/10 attacking team so what does adding another star actually do?

I cant agree with tou

Isak will elevate their attack to a level that any team can't reach

Without Isak, I have more doubts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pizy said:

I still do t see how Liverpool getting Isak makes any sense after they’ve signed Ekitike for £80m. Isak starts every PL and UCL match if he’s fit. So they’re going to have an £80m striker who just arrived sitting on the bench most games? It’s nonsensical. 

Ekitike isnt a pure CF and would be better as a LF.if they don't sign Isak ,they can play Ekitike at CF but they can certainly play together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...