zolayes 14,489 Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 preconceptions or misconceptions will always defeat statistics ..... SeB 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 Are you seriously gonna make that conclusion just from that reply?! Unless he is being sarcastic, the point he (Mikel) is trying to make is that Lampard does not help out defensively "No one will cover...". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoChelsea 4,064 Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 Unless he is being sarcastic, the point he (Mikel) is trying to make is that Lampard does not help out defensively "No one will cover...".No, he isn't. The point Mikel is clearly making is the it's not the defensive midfielder's position to go forward. If the DM goes forward, it leaves a spot uncovered. He's explaining why defensive midfielders don't join the play, not making a specific criticism of Lampard. It's an absurd reading of a straightforward comment. (Also, It's absolutely not the job of the deep-lying midfielder to cover for runs made by the defensive midfielder because the defensive midfielder should not be making runs. Busquets might be the best defensive midfielder in the world right now and he has scored 3 goals in his career. Makalele is the greatest defensive midfielder Chelsea ever had and he scored 2 goals in 144 games in the league with us.) CHOULO19, zolayes, SeB and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 No, he isn't. The point Mikel is clearly making is the it's not the defensive midfielder's position to go forward. If the DM goes forward, it leaves a spot uncovered. He's explaining why defensive midfielders don't join the play, not making a specific criticism of Lampard. It's an absurd reading of a straightforward comment.No, it isn't. If he was really saying that why didn't he just say something like "I'm a defensive midfielder, it's not my job to score goals". He said "No one will cover" because it's true. He plays in the double pivots yet it seems he has to do all the defending. Lampard bombs up the pitch too often. I don't know how some cannot see the point he is making here. Wavy Crockett and Sir Mikel OBE 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoChelsea 4,064 Posted September 8, 2012 Share Posted September 8, 2012 No, it isn't. If he was really saying that why didn't he just say something like "I'm a defensive midfielder, it's not my job to score goals". He said "No one will cover" because it's true. He plays in the double pivots yet it seems he has to do all the defending. Lampard bombs up the pitch too often. I don't know how some cannot see the point he is making here.There many ways to say the same thing. He is clearly, very clearly explaining why he doesn't go forward more. In the 4-2-3-1, the defensive midfielder just doesn't go forward. He is clearly not blaming Lampard for him not being allowed to make runs. (For starters, Mikel has played 160 league games with Chelsea and only about 5-10 with Lampard so saying that he doesn't get forward because of Lampard would be idiotic).I don't know why you think "double pivot" is one position. It isn't. There is a defensive midfielder and then a deep lying midfielder. They have different responsibilities. Lampard and Mikel are not playing the same position Lampard's job is to create and Mikel's job is to cover for defenders and to stop attacks. Busquets and Iniesta don't have the same responsibilities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 There many ways to say the same thing. He is clearly, very clearly explaining why he doesn't go forward more. In the 4-2-3-1, the defensive midfielder just doesn't go forward. He is clearly not blaming Lampard for him not being allowed to make runs. (For starters, Mikel has played 160 league games with Chelsea and only about 5-10 with Lampard so saying that he doesn't get forward because of Lampard would be idiotic).I don't know why you think "double pivot" is one position. It isn't. There is a defensive midfielder and then a deep lying midfielder. They have different responsibilities. Lampard and Mikel are not playing the same position Lampard's job is to create and Mikel's job is to cover for defenders and to stop attacks. Busquets and Iniesta don't have the same responsibilities.The Regista is still, in most cases, supposed to help out defensively as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoChelsea 4,064 Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 The Regista is still, in most cases, supposed to help out defensively as well.Of course they help out defensively. Everyone is supposed to help out defensively. However, the deep-lying playmaker is not primarily a defensive position. The defensive midfielder is primarily a defensive position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 Of course they help out defensively. Everyone is supposed to help out defensively. However, the deep-lying playmaker is not primarily a defensive position. The defensive midfielder is primarily a defensive position.What I'm saying though, is that Lampard is almost non-existent when it comes to defending. He is either at the other end of the pitch because he has been attacking too much or just too lazy to dig in and press and defend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kojo 4,676 Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 Haha, I love it!Some people can dump on Torres and Mikel every day of the week with ridiculous points, when some try to nuance and make some coherent remarks they're which hunted as if they were insane.As we say in French: the number doesn't make the sense. Some here make clueless remarks, others follows them like if they were the messiahHow is it a ridiculous point when it's evident Mikel has been awful recently?, there's no logic. Fair enough you can disagree and point out that there's still the rest of the season to go.Lets all see what happens anyway, i think he will be terrible for us and wont be able to hack it, and if you're right Seb then fair play to you, but we can only judge this at the end of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Armour 4,439 Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 What I'm saying though, is that Lampard is almost non-existent when it comes to defending. He is either at the other end of the pitch because he has been attacking too much or just too lazy to dig in and press and defend. Clearly Mikel wasn't critcizing Lampard. He was just talking about his own defensive duties.But you're right in saying Lampard has made too many forward runs ( pushing well into the opposition d-box in some of the recent games), leaving Mikel isolated in the counter-attacks. Lampard did do well in the recent England game though, and his runs yielded results. But how often do we play teams like Moldova, who hardly put pressure on the midfield? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 How is it a ridiculous point when it's evident Mikel has been awful recently?, there's no logic. Fair enough you can disagree and point out that there's still the rest of the season to go.No it's not evident, it is just your opinion which many people on here disagree with. zolayes, Madmax, We Hate Scouse and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoChelsea 4,064 Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 Mikel seems to be given instructions to go forward a little bit more (like against Reading where he assists Hazard on the pen) because that's clear he's quality when it comes to play a little bit higher. Mikel's passing accuracy doesn't seem to suffer if he plays 20 yards or 80 yards from his goal.What's a bit worrying at the moment though is those apparent instructions being given to Mikel, like "everyone goes forward" and I do think Robbie is behind that.But at the moment the main problem is elsewhere, the front 3 is static when we have the ball (or asking the ball in the wrong zome) and lazy when it happens to defend. It has then direct implication on the double pivot who's exposedI am having the same worry that you are-that RDM's instructions are too aggressive. I also have seen how the front 3 being static has allowed the counterattack to overwhelm us in the central midfield, but I think the biggest problem has been just lack of proper shape. We really have a whole bunch of central attacking midfielders and wherever we put them on the field, they want to revert to their original position. Mata and Hazard especially are both playing the same position on the field which means that we have no shape for attack or counterattack. RDM needs to instruct Mata to spend more time on the left and use Moses/Marin on the right to get the proper shape. We also have had Ivanovic bombing forward with no cover on the right which leaves us exposed. RDM definitely has some work to do. I'm not quite sure what direction RDM wants to take the squad right now. ( Meireles being sold doesn't help that.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kojo 4,676 Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 No it's not evident, it is just your opinion which many people on here disagree with.Or unless you just haven't opened your eyes and looked how shit he has been playing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevemayer 764 Posted September 11, 2012 Share Posted September 11, 2012 Or unless you just haven't opened your eyes and looked how shit he has been playing.Youre Ava is enough Statement to me zolayes 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted September 11, 2012 Share Posted September 11, 2012 remember sloth was a DM until he retired a few years ago. so he knows all about that position Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! We Hate Scouse 10,326 Posted September 11, 2012 Popular Post! Share Posted September 11, 2012 Claude Slothelele Amblève., Slam Dunk, Pacquiao and 4 others 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted September 11, 2012 Share Posted September 11, 2012 @SeB, have all my reputations. All of them. It's almost turned into a habit, I see one of your posts - I don't even read it but I do give rep for it. The Skipper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted September 11, 2012 Share Posted September 11, 2012 I hope my paycheck won't be lost while being sent to the other side of the earth Same price as usual What I tweeted yesterday: You can find many other figures on Squawka.comFrank #Lampard: 83 passes fwd, 56 backwards (60%/40%). John Obi#Mikel: 115 passes fwd, 65 backwards (63%/37%). #ClichéKillerAverage defensive pass length: #Lampard: 17.33m, #Mikel: 15m. Average attacking pass length: #Lampard: 14m, #Mikel 16m.#ClichéKiller²Long ball average length: #Lampard: 35.5m, #Mikel: 41.67m. Overall average passing length: #Lampard: 14.67m, #Mikel: 16m.#ClichéKiller³Don't worry they never are...Squawka.com, now that is an amazing website. It won't swallow as much of time as this site but nontheless: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HomePageTV Tropes will ruin your life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kojo 4,676 Posted September 11, 2012 Share Posted September 11, 2012 remember sloth was a DM until he retired a few years ago. so he knows all about that positionWhat where you?, 5th choice keeper about 500 years ago?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kojo 4,676 Posted September 11, 2012 Share Posted September 11, 2012 Claude SlotheleleMake fun of me all you want, give it a few years and we will see who is laughing in the end, whilst you've tied yourself down with your stupidity.But don't worry save yourself the homeless jokes, because it will come in handy as i wont bring them up against you when it happens to ya in 5 year time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.