Alex Sandro

[DDA 9,570]

Not even bothered. 

Let's crack on now. 

 

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

At least it is over now rather than at the deadline day

[whats happening 1,439]

delete thread

[Tomo 21,681]

5 hours ago, Rekin said:

BS. You sound like a child who only cares about getting new toys. 

Georgey is quite evidently this guy (link below), too many comparison's for it to be a coincidence.

http://forum.talkchelsea.net/profile/16092-ruudigullit/

 

[Dimitr 488]

We made 70millions pounds 

so I personally can't blame  our board . But I can blame Alex Sandro and juve ( who sold bonnuci)

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

One thing I don't like is that, we don't know for sure if we had offer them that much. 

And hopefully Matic deal is still on.

[Chelsea? 892]

4 hours ago, BluesMadLad said:

Fact still remains juve said on many occasions if the player asks to leave he could go 60 65 70 million they have rejected Them all purely because the player hasn't asked to leave. I no your frustrated but this is not chelsea fault.

My point was we didn't offer Sandro an outrageous enough salary to make him wanna leave. 

[Tautvix 1,321]

Funny that people think if Juve don't sell him there's nothing we can do. Of course it's hard to think if we can still can buy him now after Bonucci and Alves are gone but we must have acted earlier anyway. But even now. It's not about Juve, it's about to convince Sandro to come so he would ask to leave Juve. Juve would have rejected Man Utd offer for Pogba if he asked to stay. Time to stop defending our board for missing big targets. Alex Sandro must ask to leave Juve but it;s our job to convince him. And our board can't do it to any big big players.

[Spike 12,049]

I'd take a pass on this. While he would bring the left-flank to a new level that amount of dosh shouldn't just be thrown around willy-nilly. The club has a competent LB at the moment, so their are other more pressing concerns.

[!Hazard! 3,394]

16 hours ago, Spike said:

I'd take a pass on this. While he would bring the left-flank to a new level that amount of dosh shouldn't just be thrown around willy-nilly. The club has a competent LB at the moment, so their are other more pressing concerns.

Yes the club has competent LB. Singular. Another one has to be bought anyway and in this market he will easily cost at least £30 million. Might as well buy a real star. And I am afraid that Alonso will be exposed by Barca, Real, Juve, Bayern.

[jernej93 565]

1 hour ago, !Hazard! said:

Yes the club has competent LB. Singular. Another one has to be bought anyway and in this market he will easily cost at least £30 million. Might as well buy a real star. And I am afraid that Alonso will be exposed by Barca, Real, Juve, Bayern.

Considering that Hazard is playing on the same side ... it could get dirty  He had a great season but I would like to see faster and more athletic player there ... 

[Chelsea? 892]

According to Matt Law, Chelsea are still in for him. 

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

PLEASE lock this up... This thread has become tiresome.

[xPetrCechx 13,546]

Reports claim Juventus will not sanction Sandro’s sale after losing Bonucci, but that has not yet been communicated to #Chelsea. [Telegraph]

#Chelsea are yet to give up on Sandro and could use Juve’s interest in Nemanja Matic as a way to try to force a breakthrough. [Telegraph]

[Henrique 9,133]

Guys, this forum is crazy. Alex Sandro is not even close of being worth 60m or 70m. He is no Cafu, Roberto Carlos or Marcelo.

Thats crazy and madness. Its so crazy, that I can't stand the fact some people really believe we offered 70m for him and Juve really refused to sell. Really? I mean, they just sold Bonucci to rivals Milan for 35...and won't let Alex Sandro for 70???

Guys, you just lost your minds if you believe in those reports.  Of course Telegraph, Guardian, Mail and all those papers around they must keep the rumors alive, since in the "transfer market", creating transfers rumors is the only way to make fans interested in reading football news when there is no football left to play.

[The Skipper 20,593]

Matic + 25m. Fair deal for everyone. 

[Dahnald 256]

1 hour ago, Henrique said:

Guys, this forum is crazy. Alex Sandro is not even close of being worth 60m or 70m. He is no Cafu, Roberto Carlos or Marcelo.

Thats crazy and madness. Its so crazy, that I can't stand the fact some people really believe we offered 70m for him and Juve really refused to sell. Really? I mean, they just sold Bonucci to rivals Milan for 35...and won't let Alex Sandro for 70???

Guys, you just lost your minds if you believe in those reports.  Of course Telegraph, Guardian, Mail and all those papers around they must keep the rumors alive, since in the "transfer market", creating transfers rumors is the only way to make fans interested in reading football news when there is no football left to play.

I blame complete, utter tools like Carefreedaily on Twitter for hyping all these clueless Chelsea fans up. 

[Spike 12,049]

7 hours ago, Chelsea Legend 11 said:

PLEASE lock this up... This thread has become tiresome.

Then don't read it.