Jump to content

Fernando Llorente


Captain Ahmed
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

18 hours ago, BoyBlue96 said:

This whole thing proves yet again that Michy wasn't a Conte signing. 

Of course it wasn't. Look at the time when he was bought when Conte was with the Italian team. 

Rudgier was another one targeted by the club. 

But after that everything has gone through Conte, and I doubt from now on anyone will interfere. They seen what great job he is doing, so it will targets he ask for. Weather is option A, or option C it will be him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Strike said:

Reminds me of the Demba Ba deal

Ba was inform when we bought him and one of best natural scorers. Llorente is not on level for at least 3 years. 

But I can see this deal makes sense only if we get Llorente on loan, because Conte clearly doesnt count on Bats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Styles said:

Conte spent 23m on Alonso and now wants to sign struggling strikers from the bottom placed club.

Honestly, he should have no say on transfers moving forward in opinion.

Yeah because having 4 golden ball winners in the squad is always a winner team - see that horrible Real Madrid 12-13 years ago.

 With Alonso we won 13 games straight and hardly ever conceded goals. Llorente would be a backup striker - why not? He scored some goals at Swansea, he is a good player and very tall.  By the way, Conte was the one who called Kanté and convinced him to join Chelsea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Styles said:

Conte spent 23m on Alonso and now wants to sign struggling strikers from the bottom placed club.

Honestly, he should have no say on transfers moving forward in opinion.

I used to think you were one of the sensible ones.....tut tut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nyikolajevics said:

Yeah because having 4 golden ball winners in the squad is always a winner team - see that horrible Real Madrid 12-13 years ago.

 With Alonso we won 13 games straight and hardly ever conceded goals. Llorente would be a backup striker - why not? He scored some goals at Swansea, he is a good player and very tall.  By the way, Conte was the one who called Kanté and convinced him to join Chelsea.

Who the hell said anything about having a team full of ballon d'or winners?

Do you really think the only two options are world class players or the Alonso's of this world and with absolutely nothing in between?

 

1 hour ago, Polo7 said:

I used to think you were one of the sensible ones.....tut tut.

I have my moments. :Goober:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the same way that Torres was terrible here, yet perfectly adequate and 'good' for Atletico upon his return, plenty of 'past it' strikers (I'm looking at Falcao) can flourish once they're with different players in a different system. Llorente would bring something new to this team, which Bats does not. With or without Bats, we have all the same qualities, he doesn't bring something new to the table, but Llorente brings a controlled, aerial presence which Costa does not, which alone gets you 5 or so headed goals a season; and in a season where we rarely lose by over 1 goal, that's the difference we can benefit from.

Also, since his style is similar enough to Costa's, the players around him wouldn't need to change their way of playing once he comes on. Whereas when Costa goes off at the moment, suddenly we decide our replacement striker isn't worthy enough of having the ball fed to him, and thus it goes to either Pedro or Hazard as they become the main attacking threat. 

For 6 months of football we could do worse than use a player that Conte's already familiar with.

He's averaged 1 goal every 2.5 games in both the Premier League and Serie A. This mostly being a sub. Wanting anything more from a sub is spoiled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, this loan-swap would ensure Bats plays pretty much every game until the end of the season. That is what we want. We need to see if he can kick it in the Premier League for 6 months straight. But, we aren't in a position to experiment with 1 player and his personal potential. It's a move which makes more than good sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it more embarrassing for us or for Michy that he cost more than Diego Costa and Eden Hazard yet has to go out on loan half way through his first season here?

If he is to go on loan, though, I wish it were to a better club than Swansea. At least send him to a club like West Ham who can maybe take points off our rivals with Michy playing for them. He'll get shit service and be surrounded by shit players at Swansea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...