The Conte Thread

[Iggy Doonican 4,186]

6 minutes ago, Cosmin said:

Guardiola is a phenomena, he already built a dinasty at Barca before even signing for City.

Yes it must be really hard to manage the richest clubs in the world. He won the German league with Bayern which is akin to having won the Scottish league on your CV..

[Chelsea4 1,521]

Guardiola is a phenomena, he already built a dinasty at Barca before even signing for City.

Sarri won fuck all with Napoli, with all due respect. Remember how Borussia used to play under Klopp? Liverpool brought him specially because of that. And look at where they are.

If you had enough of Chelsea's management, you should try to have an objective look at how football is actually working. Man City signed Pep and built the whole club around him. Pep arrived at City in 2016, but the Pep project started one-two years earlier.

Abramovich will never do that, as his philosophy and economic principles are slightly different. You can hate it, I certainly did a lot of times, but can't accuse the man of not being successful. 

Under Abramovich, Chelsea will never create a Pep project. We'll just keep changing managers like most of the clubs do. That's why I think Conte should be supported. He's doing good. He'll face the sack sooner than later and nobody can guarantee us that what comes next will actually be better than him. 

Why not change? Barcelona appointed Guardiola in 2008 who was previously a Barcelona B coach and who had won nothing before he signed for Barcelona and look what he did. We don't need to build a whole club around Sarri but rather let Sarri implement his ideas into the club and we can slowly change/adapt to what Sarri wants,give him time and in the long term we will be successful. Don't you see why Hazard wants to leave? Because of the Football we play, we defend against any decent team,Conte can't teach or improve players in attack,in possession,in the final 3rd and the worst thing is that conman will make you believe that drawing against Arsenal is a good result FUC* OFF!

 

Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

[Chelsea4 1,521]

[emoji38]

Take Hazard off and you have West Brom.

Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk

[Special Juan 28,187]

1 minute ago, Chelsea4 said:

Take Hazard off and you have West Brom.

Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk
 

That is sure strong stuff your smoking.

[Chelsea4 1,521]

That is sure strong stuff your smoking.

It's the truth.

Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk

[Special Juan 28,187]

Just now, Chelsea4 said:

It's the truth.

Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk
 

It's not, and you are making yourself look very silly claiming otherwise.

[Fulham Broadway 17,353]

34 minutes ago, Chelsea4 said:

We are currently playing the worst Football in the league.

 

Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Change your FIFA settings from Legendary to Beginner it becomes easier

[Chelsea4 1,521]

It's not, and you are making yourself look very silly claiming otherwise.

We relay on Hazard in attack you can in every game if we can't score we will just crossing like West Brom because conman has no idea about attack.

Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk

[Special Juan 28,187]

1 minute ago, Chelsea4 said:

We relay on Hazard in attack you can in every game if we can't score we will just crossing like West Brom because conman has no idea about attack.

Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk
 

Looking at the Etihad Stadium the other night I think City are looking for supporters, you may want to consider going to support them.

[Leif 6,006]

We do play average football. 

But we largely have average players.

Mind blowing.

[Cosmin 2,484]

17 minutes ago, Iggy Doonican said:

Yes it must be really hard to manage the richest clubs in the world. He won the German league with Bayern which is akin to having won the Scottish league on your CV..

It's not that it's hard or easy to manage. He's a phenomena because he makes people re-shape their clubs in order to fit his philosophy. It's exactly what he's been doing for City since 2015. His tenure at Bayern was a semi-failure because the club missed to do exactly that: they weren't flexible enough. It's a matter of compatibility. Give Guardiola Real Madrid and he won't be able to build a dinasty there. He needs a medium-big club (like City) and he'll turn the club into a great one. You might say that it's because of money and it probably is, but how many clubs didn't have a lot of cash in the same time and won nothing? I can think of a certain Real Madrid during his Barca times. He absolutely destroyed Real with all of their money, while his investments in transfers were only decent I'd say. 

@Chelsea4 - not change because Roman doesn't want to. And no one can force him. And even if he'd want to change something, it would take a lot of time to build a fresh identity (Chelsea are already established as one of Europe's finest - probably Guardiola wouldn't be as successful here as he's at City) and to find the right man for the job. Sarri's definitely not the one, as he doesn't win stuff. In my opinion, Roman will always think on short term. That's the way he sees it and this was proven many many times. 

[Chelsea4 1,521]

Looking at the Etihad Stadium the other night I think City are looking for supporters, you may want to consider going to support them.

Classic yer da response if i have a different opinion and if i want Chelsea to play different it doesn't mean i should support a different club.

Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk

[Special Juan 28,187]

1 minute ago, Chelsea4 said:

Classic yer da response if i have a different opinion and if i want Chelsea to play different it doesn't mean i should support a different club.

Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk
 

Well your obviously not happy supporting one of the most successful English sides for the past ten years

You have just compared us to WBA Not sure where you are right now but I think it could be close to bedtime.

[Pizy 18,993]

I think it's more likely than not that Conte leaves this summer. I just don't want Allegri to replace him as rumors suggest. Simeone I'd pass on as well just because although he's brilliant, he's too Mourinho-like for my taste. Tuchel is the obvious pick. Young, progressive manager who wants to play attacking football.

[Iggy Doonican 4,186]

2 minutes ago, Cosmin said:

It's not that it's hard or easy to manage. He's a phenomena because he makes people re-shape their clubs in order to fit his philosophy. It's exactly what he's been doing for City since 2015. His tenure at Bayern was a semi-failure because the club missed to do exactly that: they weren't flexible enough. It's a matter of compatibility. Give Guardiola Real Madrid and he won't be able to build a dinasty there. He needs a medium-big club (like City) and he'll turn the club into a great one. You might say that it's because of money and it probably is, but how many clubs didn't have a lot of cash in the same time and won nothing? I can think of a certain Real Madrid during his Barca times. He absolutely destroyed Real with all of their money, while his investments in transfers were decent I'd say. 

@Chelsea4 - not change because Roman doesn't want to. And no one can force him. And even if he'd want to change something, it would take a lot of time to build a fresh identity (Chelsea are already established as one of Europe's finest) and to find the right man for the job. Sarri's definitely not the one, as he doesn't win stuff. In my opinion, Roman will always think on short term. That's the way he sees it and this was proven many many times. 

He's a phenomena yet you say his tenure at Bayern was a semi failure.? Look mate I'm not getting into a debate about something I don't particularly care about. Pretty sure that's a typo by the way how many clubs didn't have a lot of cash in the same time and won nothing.ergo clubs who have money win everything.

[Chelsea4 1,521]

Well your obviously not happy supporting one of the most successful English sides for the past ten years
You have just compared us to WBA[emoji38] Not sure where you are right now but I think it could be close to bedtime.

We are currently playing like West Brom,like a small club and how can i be happy with this? It seems all of you enjoy how we are playing or maybe all of you have accepted mediocracy which in that case i can't blame you we have stalled and we haven't improved since 2013.

Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk

[Magic Lamps 11,692]

6 minutes ago, Pizy said:

I think it's more likely than not that Conte leaves this summer. I just don't want Allegri to replace him as rumors suggest. Simeone I'd pass on as well just because although he's brilliant, he's too Mourinho-like for my taste. Tuchel is the obvious pick. Young, progressive manager who wants to play attacking football.

Tuchel would be horrible. Not a good defensive coach, not consistent enough in the league and a difficult character who does bot like being restricted by the board. He would not last a full season. I would hope for Conte to at least see out his contract. Simeone and Allegri would both be fine to me. Both have shown that they can get the best out of mediocre talents and washed up players which our squad basically consists of and operate within tight financial restrictions.

[Special Juan 28,187]

I've got an even easier solution than cherry picking names.....How about we keep Conte and just give him loads of cash to build the team HE wants.

Oh wait, that doesn't make sense, but sacking him does

[Fulham Broadway 17,353]

Some fans clearly show the downside of our club being bought by a billionaire.  ''I want, I want, its not fair, we're crap, Mummy !!''

For me I am quite happy with all the silverware, and last night being our 22nd semi final in 10 years

[Pizy 18,993]

7 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

I've got an even easier solution than cherry picking names.....How about we keep Conte and just give him loads of cash to build the team HE wants.

Oh wait, that doesn't make sense, but sacking him does

Conte staying would be the best possible outcome but I think him walking is a real possibility. Say we see our rivals once again signing top players while we scrounge around the dollar/£1 shop for bargains. Will Conte put up with that again if  a PSG or AC Milan promise him to moon?