The Conte Thread

[Iggy Doonican 4,186]

6 hours ago, Jason said:

Have to say, for all the good things Conte is doing, he's quite questionable when it comes to making substitution. Could have been sitting here and talking about points dropped had it not been for Pedro and Fabianski.

Have to say it's quite pointless talking about something that didn't happen.

[Spike 12,049]

10 minutes ago, manpe said:

Same here, can't make out who are those people who "should be banned" and for which comments. Barbara's and Iggy's outbursts look just so random to me.

 

28 minutes ago, Leif said:

What are these walls of text & lowkey comments aimed at? You read back the last 3 pages which includes posts from the same people and there's nothing but praise bar one valid comment on pg 185 that some of his decisions are 'odd', which they are, which is fine, because from some that would be a compliment. 

What the fuck is this mini outburst? Is it towards ghosts? Past demons? Find me 2 forum members not in love with Conte, because I'd struggle.

It may not be directed at any people on here. People on facebook in particular are silly.

[Iggy Doonican 4,186]

5 minutes ago, manpe said:

Same here, can't make out who are those people who "should be banned" and for which comments. Barbara's and Iggy's outbursts look just so random to me.

There is to much moaning in general not pointing the finger at any individual it's just we should be happy as fuck with where we are rather than over analysing things. I would never ask anyone to be banned I've been banned from loads of things in the past as well as football forums 

[manpe 10,861]

6 minutes ago, Spike said:

 

It may not be directed at any people on here. People on facebook in particular are silly.

Barbara said "from this thread".

[Chelsea? 892]

I mean all i see here are people complaining that people aren't happy with Conte. But I've yet to see one person reallY criticize him lol. I mean just cause someone said he makes poor subs doesn't mean he wants Conte out or anything. 

[Leif 6,006]

Posts are posted when relevant otherwise they'd be pointless; she isn't talking about 10 pages ago clearly, nor am I only highlighting her; I'm highlighting everyone on pg 185. Not everyone can be offhandly & randomly referencing some other pages in the thread. But if i'm wrong there, am I right in thinking there's a collective ruckus based on posts I still can't find, probably from 10+ pages ago, no doubt an opinion shared by about 0.5% of the forum? #185 simply makes no sense. This one day on this one forum on that one page we see one of the most bizarre things in spectator-sport history. Favelas will be named after page one-eighty-five.

[manpe 10,861]

9 minutes ago, Chelsea? said:

I mean all i see here are people complaining that people aren't happy with Conte. But I've yet to see one person reallY criticize him lol. I mean just cause someone said he makes poor subs doesn't mean he wants Conte out or anything. 

It cannot be Jason's post, he simply expressed his opinion for topic of discussion. Attacking people for that is nonsensical. Leif could be right, it could be an older ruckus and Jason's post simply tore open old wounds and got people triggered 

[Barbara 15,149]

Barbara said "from this thread".

Meant banned from posting on this thread, which obviously was a figure of speech, not literally, as people can't even be banned from one thread.
I couldn't keep reading through the many pages I was behind and when I skipped to the last page there were people nitpicking again.
I just find it to be extremely spoiled and spoiling for people to put everything under the microscope.
I came to post about the important win today, about finally giving Cesc a start in a match Matic had no point starting, to say I'm so happy and relieved for having him, a world class manager in every aspect of the job.
But I was deflected by a few posts and decided to vent.
If people can vent about nonexistent mistakes he made today and in other occasions, I can vent about the nonexistent need of said things, even if this is a forum.

[manpe 10,861]

5 minutes ago, Barbara said:

Meant banned from posting on this thread, which obviously was a figure of speech, not literally, as people can't even be banned from one thread.
I couldn't keep reading through the many pages I was behind and when I skipped to the last page there were people nitpicking again.
I just find it to be extremely spoiled and spoiling for people to put everything under the microscope.
I came to post about the important win today, about finally giving Cesc a start in a match Matic had no point starting, to say I'm so happy and relieved for having him, a world class manager in every aspect of the job.
But I was deflected by a few posts and decided to vent.
If people can vent about nonexistent mistakes he made today and in other occasions, I can vent about the nonexistent need of said things, even if this is a forum.

That explains it. There was definitely some nitpicking a while ago when we weren't playing too well, so I can understand if you were behind and read all those that had accumulated (let's be fair, in the grand scheme nobody is critical of Conte).

[Chelsea? 892]

He's becoming my fav Chelsea coach ever. Just beating out Carlo. 

 

 

 

[Chelsea? 892]

36 minutes ago, manpe said:

That explains it. There was definitely some nitpicking a while ago when we weren't playing too well, so I can understand if you were behind and read all those that had accumulated (let's be fair, in the grand scheme nobody is critical of Conte).

Manpe your making too much sense lately. Everything ok?

[communicate 2,703]

15 hours ago, Jason said:

Have to say, for all the good things Conte is doing, he's quite questionable when it comes to making substitution. Could have been sitting here and talking about points dropped had it not been for Pedro and Fabianski.

At that moment, I am not sure what should we do, we already playing attacking lineup with cesc on the field, maybe willian for moses/Alonso is the next but I think it was too early

Sometimes I disagree with his sub but against swansea I agree 100%, the moment we scored Matic is badly needed because we need more steel in midfield and taller player.

[Jase 43,479]

9 hours ago, Iggy Doonican said:

Have to say it's quite pointless talking about something that didn't happen.

Well, I did say 'could...'. Anyway, I was only looking at the bigger picture. Making early subs when needed doesn't seem to be Conte's strongest point or one of his strongest and while we dominated yesterday, the game was heading nowhere and there was no change or anything with 20 minutes to go. Thankfully Pedro scored and everything went according to plan but 'things' could have turned out very differently.

[11Drogba 2,000]

We have the best goal difference stat for the last 30 minutes. You may not like Conte's substitutions or timing of them but in the last 30 minutes we dominate.

http://www.soccerstats.com/timing.asp?league=england

[Jase 43,479]

4 hours ago, communicate said:

At that moment, I am not sure what should we do, we already playing attacking lineup with cesc on the field, maybe willian for moses/Alonso is the next but I think it was too early

Sometimes I disagree with his sub but against swansea I agree 100%, the moment we scored Matic is badly needed because we need more steel in midfield and taller player.

No one is disagreeing with the subs after going 2-1 up...

[Antonio8 736]

 i hope abramovic put cash on this summer market..

conte deserves a great market session

 

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

7 hours ago, 11Drogba said:

We have the best goal difference stat for the last 30 minutes. You may not like Conte's substitutions or timing of them but in the last 30 minutes we dominate.

http://www.soccerstats.com/timing.asp?league=england

We like the Second half.

[manpe 10,861]

 

I would go gay for him. Just say the word Antonio.