Jump to content

Alexandre Pato


KleyLima
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 826
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

On 05/02/2016 at 10:47 PM, Pizy said:

You couldn't make it up. Just have to laugh because it's so unbelievably mad.

Fuck sake. Are we Arsenal? Is this Kallstrom in disguise?! Thank fuck we kept hold of Remy, not that he'll play or anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5 de fevereiro de 2016 at 8:47 PM, Pizy said:

You couldn't make it up. Just have to laugh because it's so unbelievably mad.

Hilarious some people believe in piece of story that don't even indicates a single source. Pato wasn't injured, and played the entire Campeoanto Brasileiro last season, he missed pre season (even thought was involved in pshysical training in early january) so there is a reason why he needs a training programme to regain his form. There is no reason to believe he needs 6 more weeks of training to be fit to even play some games. But, hey, this article was written by the same guy who, one day before Mourinho was sacked, was writing the same thing over and over "a Chelsea insider said Mourinho's positions is unchanged".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The story isn't really whether he needs 6 weeks to play a match, but whether he will need 6 weeks to be fully match fit. I can certainly buy the latter.

Imagine our own beginning of the season - a 'normal' season not this one - and how long it takes for the players to regain match sharpness. Well, Pato is in that stage right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get the meltdown over his lack of fitness. It's been over two months since he last played a game and he's coming from a League that plays at a snails pace compared to the PL. When you see how (annoyingly) patient we're being with Hazard it's unsurprising we're careful with Pato.

Hiddink seems like a manager that prefers to play players that are 100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gilvorak said:

I don't get the meltdown over his lack of fitness. It's been over two months since he last played a game and he's coming from a League that plays at a snails pace compared to the PL. When you see how (annoyingly) patient we're being with Hazard it's unsurprising we're careful with Pato.

Hiddink seems like a manager that prefers to play players that are 100%.

If we were so desperate to buy a striker/attacker that we'd take one who's a month from match fitness, why wouldn't we instead just get one who was fit? That's why I'm personally puzzled by this move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pizy said:

If we were so desperate to buy a striker/attacker that we'd take one who's a month from match fitness, why wouldn't we instead just get one who was fit? That's why I'm personally puzzled by this move.

But tell me Pizy what strikers were available and would want to come here knowing we can't offer them the nr 1 striker position ? Let's face it whoever came in would have to play second fiddle to Costa. What quality striker would accept that ?

Also buying players in january is always difficult as clubs don't want to part with key players in the middle of the season.

And then there's also our whole situation we're in atm. Poor season, no CL next season and not knowing who our manager will be next season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You