Loïc Rémy

[Nike 373]

Remy is world class in terms of pace for CFs....

Besides that, he will probably have a difficult time playing holdup striker.

I would of prefer Costa, Giroud/Bony/Gomis, and Remy.

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

I reckon he fancies the #14 shirt worn by Henry, his idol, at Arse. Schurrle will probably take #9

I think the numbers for the season have already been submitted.

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

Remy is world class in terms of pace for CFs....

Besides that, he will probably have a difficult time playing holdup striker.

You expect him to be used in that fashion?

[Nike 373]

You expect him to be used in that fashion?

Yeap.

Costa cant start every game and Remy is a better option than Drogba. Chelsea made Torres play as a holdup player, wanted Lukaku to be a holdup striker, Ba and Eto.

[robsblubot 3,595]

So what do you offer as an alternative????!!!

City have all those strikers and broke the FFP, its not something I want to see happen here at Chelsea regardless of who isn't abiding by it. They broke the rules and only won the title by 2pts... that says something to me, that they have GROSSLY overspent.

One of my biggest pet peeves is when people use one person as an example to explain why someone else can fail. Demba Ba was actually a pretty good striker for us, scored key goals despite not getting a lot of game time. I still wouldn't have minded having him at the club this year, just because he moved on doesn't mean he wasn't very good he probably wanted to be the no.1 guy again. Remy is a completely different striker who's pace and technique gives us something we don't have.

City don't care about cheap, but they should! Because the rules require that they DO! THE RULES! Listen man if you really want Chelsea to follow the example set out by City I don't have much more to say to you, I don't want to see guys we've spent 25m on sitting on the bench for 5-10 games at a time. Its a ridiculous amount of money to pay for an insurance policy... "Oh wait guys JUST IN CASE Costa gets injured, we need to go buy another striker of equal value so we don't miss out on trophies!!" That doesn't sound silly to you?

Its a fantastic buy because the club went out and got exactly what we need without breaking the bank to get it. The enthusiasm stems from the fact that the club have clearly identified the problems that existed last year and addressed them with incredible precision. We play a one striker system, in a perfect world Costa will play 45 odd games how much do you think would be a worthy investment/insurance policy for 15 games or so?

Have nothing to say about your rant on City, Rules, and people who compare one play with another?!

Cheaper signings are riskier by definition... that's how the market works.

No it doesn't sound silly to me at all because like I said, in my very personal opinion, all other top clubs in England have better options to replace their lead striker. Our lead striker is as good as anyone's, but not our subs.

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

Yeap.

Costa cant start every game and Remy is a better option than Drogba. Chelsea made Torres play as a holdup player, wanted Lukaku to be a holdup striker, Ba and Eto.

our main striker needs to be able to hold up the ball, thats not true for our secondary striker... Eto'o is who Remy is replacing.

[Nike 373]

our main striker needs to be able to hold up the ball, thats not true for our secondary striker... Eto'o is who Remy is replacing.

Eto held the ball up better than Torres, lukaku, ba did in recent times.

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

Cheaper signings are riskier by definition... that's how the market works.

No it doesn't sound silly to me at all because like I said, in my very personal opinion, all other top clubs in England have better options to replace their lead striker. Our lead striker is as good as anyone's, but not our subs.

The fact that through this entire exchange you haven't once mentioned who you think would've been a better buy speaks volumes to me.

You may be somewhat... actually no. But at any rate, Chelsea have built the most complete, balanced squad in the Prem. Most of the teams I think you are looking at play a two striker system, not one.

[Nike 373]

The fact that through this entire exchange you haven't once mentioned who you think would've been a better buy speaks volumes to me.

You may be somewhat... actually no. But at any rate, Chelsea have built the most complete, balanced squad in the Prem. Most of the teams I think you are looking at play a two striker system, not one.

Most complete Im not too sure of.

I think City is the most complete team in the EPL. However, Hart has been sucking for a while and their whole team is injury prone these days.

[The Skipper 20,609]

Have nothing to say about your rant on City, Rules, and people who compare one play with another?!

Cheaper signings are riskier by definition... that's how the market works.

No it doesn't sound silly to me at all because like I said, in my very personal opinion, all other top clubs in England have better options to replace their lead striker. Our lead striker is as good as anyone's, but not our subs.

All other top clubs have two lead strikers in their first team XI, we only have one.

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

Eto held the ball up better than Torres, lukaku, ba did in recent times.

But that's not why he was purchased... If you say he was better than them in that regard( I'm not really gonna bother agreeing or disagreeing) then that is just bonus. Rooney was our target the whole summer, not for his hold up play but his technical ability and link up play. That is how I envision Remy.

[The Skipper 20,609]

Compare ourselves to people who similarly only have 1 lead striker in their system - Real for example. Who do they have as back up to Benzema? That's right - Hernandez.