Jump to content

Arsenal vs Chelsea


Jase
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 908
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How exactly is Cazorla better? What more does he offer? Baffled.

Hes a better playmaker. Comes deep and completely runs the game in midfield but then has the passing and creativity to deliver in the final third. Not many players have both . Silva , cesc , mata are final third specialists. Cazorla basically is an iniesta lite where he can completely control the game but also act in the final third . Mata has an extremely promising future but hes not better than Cazorla currently, which is no slight on him as 4 years younger .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What nonsense. Until only recently, people barely even knew who Cazorla was and now he is better than Juan Mata? LOL

And they knew of Mata before he moved to england? Just typical epl watching fans ignorance. Go on any barca, rm , la liga forum theyll tell you about Cazorla. Cazorla has been a man stay in spanish national team for years. Hes first choice when xavi or iniesta are out , Del Bosque doesnt trust any of the aforementioned to play in the deeper role dictating the midfield play .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stats doesn't told me that Cazorla is better than Mata,not even when Juan was a player of Valencia.

yh because stats are really the measure of a midfielder . How do Juan matas stats stack up with xavi and iniesta ? Bet he blows them out the water. Hes a final third specialist not a playmaker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And they knew of Mata before he moved to england? Just typical epl watching fans ignorance. Go on any barca, rm , la liga forum theyll tell you about Cazorla. Cazorla has been a man stay in spanish national team for years. Hes first choice when xavi or iniesta are out , Del Bosque doesnt trust any of the aforementioned to play in the deeper role dictating the midfield play .

All you've basically said is that Cazorla is a more all round player. Fair enough but Mata is much better in the final third. They're different types of players I guess. However I suspect most people would choose Mata in their team before Cazorla. Mata is just simply better and more creative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All you've basically said is that Cazorla is a more all round player. Fair enough but Mata is much better in the final third. They're different types of players I guess. However I suspect most people would choose Mata in their team before Cazorla. Mata is just simply better and more creative.

They really wouldnt , thats the thing youre wearing blue tinted glasses. When you ask around , theyll tell you Cazorla .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there any prizes for saying who's better than who? First, it's Oscar better than Hazard/Mata and now it's Mata better Cazorla. :doh: Give it a rest fellas! None of you are really gonna agree with each other anyway and the more you argue, the more you'll just be going in circles! :doh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They really wouldnt , thats the thing youre wearing blue tinted glasses. When you ask around , theyll tell you Cazorla .

You're doing the same I'm doing...Assuming. Cazorla is a good player but is being overrated. Mata is just about as good as Silva.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're doing the same I'm doing...Assuming. Cazorla is a good player but is being overrated. Mata is just about as good as Silva.

Nah not really. I think youre underrating him severely . I also think Mata is as good as Silva but I like Cazorla more than both - think he offers more to the way a team plays.

Pointless argument anyway . Doesnt benefit anyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...