Would you have classed Barca as revenge had we lost in Munich?

[Ollie 4,400]

50/50.

Yes because we stopped them from winning it and we made them feel like they made us feel at the time.

No because we would've still been gutted if we lost the final, and of course Barca won their final in 2009.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

We did not get revenge, we deserved to beat them both in 2009 and this year. We won't get revenge until we beat them by 5 or 6 goals!

[diskoviolente 425]

Beating them in our own style and winning the trophy in our own style as well was the best make up for all the deeps we´ve gone through in the CL.

For me it didn´t felt like revenge, it was more important to get closer to the eventual success.

[HRiver 1,512]

We got revenge, because we beat them in a Champions League semi-final, just like they beat us 3 years ago. It wouldn't have been revenge if we beat them in a friendly game or in a game of less importance, for example, like some Liverpool fans who considered the 4-1 victory against us in the league as a revenge for the FA Cup final. We won the cup, they finished 8th, so it's hilarious to consider that revenge.

But for me, this was definitely revenge. Probably if we lost in Munich it wouldn't have been a complete one, but we got revenge, nevertheless.

And call me crazy, but, after the semi final in 2009 I wasn't as annoyed as the vast majority of Chelsea fans. The defeat was heartbreaking, and Ovrebo made my blood boil, but imagine if we lost two Champions League finals in two years, against the same opponent? That would've been a thousand times more heartbreaking than conceding that last minute Iniesta goal.

[OneMoSalah 8,803]

I now class Barca as faggots, never mind classing that game as revenge. They're a bunch of diving pansy bastards.