Kieran. 6,317 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 The faggot is a twatNo. Rmpr 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 No.LOL, I do what I want...Strange things can happen these days! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Even if that's true - which I have major doubts over - it doesn't change the fact Hazard was in the wrong. The ball-boy was also, but Hazard must be prepared to accept the consequences. The FA will obviously make an example of Hazard, that's wrong, but it's logical.the F A and logic in the same sentence .... you must be a genius...or their spin doctor super_frank8 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Even if that's true - which I have major doubts over - it doesn't change the fact Hazard was in the wrong. The ball-boy was also, but Hazard must be prepared to accept the consequences. The FA will obviously make an example of Hazard, that's wrong, but it's logical.Major doubts? Might wanna actually read the thread you're posting in mate, it's filled with links and information. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquidator 5,176 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 I really do despair of our Football Association. (And the media in England too. Nile Ranger is arrested on suspicion of rape and it is hardly seen in the news, Hazard accidently kicks a little cunt and its all over the news) Rmpr and Muzchap 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Major doubts? Might wanna actually read the thread you're posting in mate, it's filled with links and information.Again, it's not the point. The point is Hazard's conduct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 It's a disgrace.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 the F A and logic in the same sentence .... you must be a genius...or their spin doctor okay fair comeback Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milan 17,957 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2267779/Eden-Hazard-kicks-Swansea-ball-boy-game--play-here.html Rmpr 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2267779/Eden-Hazard-kicks-Swansea-ball-boy-game--play-here.htmlFUUUCK, GOT A RED CARD!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Considering it's the FA, hardly a surprise that Hazard has been charged. They are completely blowing this out of proportion!Elsewhere...Sam Wallace @SamWallaceIndy One less thing for Eden Hazard to worry about: South Wales police say they will not be pursuing investigation into ball-boy incident Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slam Dunk 1,442 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Going to be banned for kicking a football. Hilarious... MetsajCFC and Azpinator 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONI. 1,291 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 He should be able to play against Brentford though as he has until Jan 29th to answer the charges.No he can't,beacuse he has a 3 match ban beacuse of red card Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 At least 75% of footballing world support Hazard over this.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeboii 1,844 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 They're under pressure from a lot of sources to make that decision. I don't agree, but it is logical.Because the boy isn't a professional footballer making ridiculous amount of money per week. He isn't part of the game, and even though he was wrong to be covering the ball, Hazard doesn't have the right to take matters into his own hands. He may have kicked the ball, but the nature of kicking it when the boy was on the ground equates to violent conduct.Who the fuck gives a shit about his money? If he was poor would it be ok? I just don't get if people are rich how everyone is allowed to say what they want about them and they may never do things normal people do. Hamilton and MetsajCFC 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Who the fuck gives a shit about his money? If he was poor would it be ok? I just don't get if people are rich how everyone is allowed to say what they want about them and they may never do things normal people do.Not what he was trying to say. He said he gains a lot of money to help CFC and to be a role model and that was not what he did. he ended up doing more harm than good...I am not judging, just trying to clarify what he meant! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Again, it's not the point. The point is Hazard's conduct.Sigh. That's exactly the point, he didn't misbehave. I assume the unwarranted red card makes you say he did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Stingray 9,441 Posted January 25, 2013 Popular Post! Share Posted January 25, 2013 Because the conduct was of a violent nature? --I really don't see how anyone's surprised by this or not even accepting of this. Hazard made a stupid decision, imo the punishment will fit the crime.Thats a serious rambling there. What is the crime exactly you are referring to? He did not hit anyone. I do not accept this. It is simply bullshit. When ethics are concerned, this is my field. Sorry to bring this up but I used teach this at the local university. You can condone people because of a number of reasons:1. Deontological: did he break an a actual rule - moral or legal. Actually no, when you see the footage. Is there a deontological code broken in his action. No, there is no stipulation of this fact. Consider what Cantona would be liable for in this case ....2. Consequentionalism: Is there damage done, in hindsight. No. There is nothing there. 3. Virtue ethics: is Hazard someone who promotes the wrong values, does he do stuff that make football look bad. The proof of the pudding is in the eating here: nobody seems to think so, even our opponents. The only value that is being promoted here is that it is actually ok to have ball boys have an effect on the game. Not to even mention the fact of the twitter account or the fact that the ball boysfather has a serious interest in Swansea's performance. 4. Utilitarian (think Jeremy Bentham): what kind of 'utlity ' or good did Hazard prevent from being the case. None. We lost, even with Hazards action.Conclusion: all the debate is an emotional debate (Richard Hare if people wanna know/research). It is about what we feel, especially the FA. Not about the question at hand. I am seriously disgusted because of the intellectuall stupidity of what i going on... Also and in addition: an argument that involves our 'pr' or our image is the worst. This is merely big brother level and deserves to be burned , nothing more. Fuck off FA. I will love Chelsea forever. Period. Eggman, super_frank8, tmessy and 10 others 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeboii 1,844 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Not what he was trying to say. He said he gains a lot of money to help CFC and to be a role model and that was not what he did. he ended up doing more harm than good...I am not judging, just trying to clarify what he meant!I doubt he gets money for being a role model... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 At least 75% of footballing world support Hazard over this.. What's the point? So many already backed Hazard before this and the FA still wants to punish him.The way he went about getting the ball may not have been pretty but a 3-match ban would have been sufficed FFS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.