Bosnian Blue 2,471 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 http://www.abola.pt/nnh/ver.aspx?id=343454And here's the Abola story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky 301 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 If and it's a big IF we bought Cavani we would have to sell Torres. He won't play second fiddle again and I'm sure his £175k a week wages are something the club would be looking to off load for a bench warmer."In Nando I trust", think he Sturridge and Lukaka are good enough to cover the one striker spot in our squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouNameIt 1,511 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Cavani isnt an option. He will be too bloody expensive. For those money we'll get Hulk+azp or Moses etc.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HNKS 508 Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Hulk is a perfect buy for us. I believe he has the strength to succeed in the premiership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 Hulk looked dangerous against team GB. For me, he only reinstated why we should buy him. Provides physicality and strength (skinned Micah Richards alive to win the Penalty). He also gives us width. Hope we go back in for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
channing 8 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 the skybet of hulk is back hope we can get him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelsea? 892 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 I think if Hulk is surrounded by the players we have, he'll have more space to take players on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisho 33 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 if hulk leaves porto its definitley to us i believe. There is no one who wants him that can afford him accept us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 if hulk leaves porto its definitley to us i believe. There is no one who wants him that can afford him accept us.PSG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisho 33 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 PSGYa but his stated that much prefers a move to us and that he is not interesterd in a move to psg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 When psg was still interested, they had 60mio + that was later spent on Milan duo. I dont think they can spend another 50mio now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 18,907 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 Hulk + Oscar + Azpilicueta = Chelsea being co-favorite, if not prohibitive favorite for the prem title. Hulk is the most important piece to the puzzle. A must buy in my opinion. Even if it takes £35-38m, we should just do it. Shirt sales and new sponsorship will ensure we won't be regretting it later. I know he'll be a success here. DO IT ROMAN! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 Hulk + Oscar + Azpilicueta = Chelsea being co-favorite, if not prohibitive favorite for the prem title. Yes we may be, however I think 6th to 1st is too big a jump, especially after all the young new players we're getting. I think our Defence may need a bit of strengthening down the line. I think we'll finish top 3 easily with a few cups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 18,907 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 Yes we may be, however I think 6th to 1st is too big a jump, especially after all the young new players we're getting. I think our Defence may need a bit of strengthening down the line. I think we'll finish top 3 easily with a few cups.In my opinion, Arsenal won't be nearly as flukey and lucky without RvP, Spuds will lose Modric and won't be as strong, and I'm not so sure Newcastle will be as good as they were.3rd is the lowest I can see us finishing as long as we're healthy. I think we're probably just as good as United now, and with a those three signings stated above, we'd be right there with City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 In my opinion, Arsenal won't be nearly as flukey and lucky without RvP, Spuds will lose Modric and won't be as strong, and I'm not so sure Newcastle will be as good as they were.3rd is the lowest I can see us finishing as long as we're healthy. I think we're probably just as good as United now, and with a those three signings stated above, we'd be right there with City.Yes but like I said it will take time to gel together and for our new players to adapt to a new, tougher league. I do agree however that 3rd is the lowest we'll finish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisho 33 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 only time will tell no sense trying to figure out where we will finish, football doesn't work like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoChelsea 4,064 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 only time will tell no sense trying to figure out where we will finish, football doesn't work like thatAgree. City had much more talent than United last season and were much healthier and they still finished even on points. I think the goal this season should be a CL Spot and to be competitive in all competitions while transitioning successfully into the new style that Roman wants. If we win something, obviously that's even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin_3d 1,140 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 Agree. City had much more talent than United last season and were much healthier and they still finished even on points. I think the goal this season should be a CL Spot and to be competitive in all competitions while transitioning successfully into the new style that Roman wants. If we win something, obviously that's even better.The whole City thing was down to one men, Mancini!Which is why I wanted City to win the league and not United.Cause City winning the league meant City would kept Mancini and would not spend big as they would felt contend with what they had.So far my theory has proven right.The longer Mancini stays at City the easier it will be for United and Chelsea to get back and challenge for the tittle! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 The whole City thing was down to one men, Mancini!Which is why I wanted City to win the league and not United.Cause City winning the league meant City would kept Mancini and would not spend big as they would felt contend with what they had.So far my theory has proven right.The longer Mancini stays at City the easier it will be for United and Chelsea to get back and challenge for the tittle! I absolutely, unequivocally agree. If Mourinho was the City manager, with that squad he'd have won the league by the end of April and posted 100+ points. Mancini is tactically inept and not particularly good at keeping his squad in order (as we can see through Tevez and Balotelli both playing up). He only won the league - with that squad (Aguero, Tevez, Dzeko, Balotelli, Silva, Nasri, Yaya, Johnson, etc. etc.) - on goal difference. He very nearly blew it. The longer they delude themselves with the idea that Mancini is the messiah, the better. I do not want to demean his achievement, because winning the league is a phenomenal feat. But, like Ancelotti, he only won the title by the skin of his nose when in reality it should not have been such a close-run thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzchap 8,966 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 I absolutely, unequivocally agree. If Mourinho was the City manager, with that squad he'd have won the league by the end of April and posted 100+ points. Mancini is tactically inept and not particularly good at keeping his squad in order (as we can see through Tevez and Balotelli both playing up). He only won the league - with that squad (Aguero, Tevez, Dzeko, Balotelli, Silva, Nasri, Yaya, Johnson, etc. etc.) - on goal difference. He very nearly blew it. The longer they delude themselves with the idea that Mancini is the messiah, the better. I do not want to demean his achievement, because winning the league is a phenomenal feat. But, like Ancelotti, he only won the title by the skin of his nose when in reality it should not have been such a close-run thing.Lol - thread derail?Was that a Yes/no on Hulk then But totally agree on Mancini, spineless idiot and cannot wait to hear his excuses again this year.That's what I love about RDM, he's always so 'classy' in front of a camera - absolute dignity and it's nice for a change that other fans also think he is a class act Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts