Lucas Piazón

[Kinol 337]

I havent the time to list all the failures

Why are those loans failures?

[zolayes 14,489]

Why are those loans failures?

look back over the last EIGHT years and work it out for yourself ,,,,

[Kinol 337]

Piazon got subbed in at the 67th minute Good for him

[bushman 2,043]

Hooray Piazon plays for 23 minutes today.

[BowtiesAreCool 16]

As I was advised: Just hit the road !

You have no debating skills whatsoever. Just saying.

Anyways, good to see Lucas get time.

[bushman 2,043]

You have no debating skills whatsoever. Just saying.

Anyways, good to see Lucas get time.

I don´t ? Somehow, you are soapiest.

[BowtiesAreCool 16]

I don´t ? Somehow, you are soapiest.

Instead of actually debating, you say "hit the road" yep, good skills right there

[bushman 2,043]

Instead of actually debating, you say "hit the road" yep, good skills right there

Have you read the whole debate of yesterday ?

I assume you have not. Therefore , hit the road!

[kellzfresh 7,229]

Stop arguing guys, a loan that is a faliure is one that is 23-24 and doesn't look like making our first team. Getting more games there is far better than staying on the bench here. Growth is important for those young lads. If at age 24 they become a mata, drogba or lampard, then it will be a massive success to get quality without spending massively.

[bushman 2,043]

Stop arguing guys, a loan that is a faliure is one that is 23-24 and doesn't look like making our first team. Getting more games there is far better than staying on the bench here. Growth is important for those young lads. If at age 24 they become a mata, drogba or lampard, then it will be a massive success to get quality without spending massively.

I agree with the notion of not sitting players on the bench. However, are those players playing ?

Last time, I have read some are just sitting around. Players like Lukaku, Courtois made sense, of course.

[Mufassir08 2,400]

So how did he play in those 23 minutes?

[kellzfresh 7,229]

I agree with the notion of not sitting players on the bench. However, are those players playing ?

Last time, I have read some are just sitting around. Players like Lukaku, Courtois made sense, of course.

I know some are not playing matches, but they won't even get a sniff at chelsea knowing how our coaching style has been over the years. So wouldn't it be nice to get an extra experience elsewhere?

[bushman 2,043]

I know some are not playing matches, but they won't even get a sniff at chelsea knowing how our coaching style has been over the years. So wouldn't it be nice to get an extra experience elsewhere?

I agree even 23 minutes for Piazon is better than no minutes at all.

Currently, Chelsea are very depleted squad. Certainly, some of these loans could have played, easily at Chelsea.

Quite honestly, there are several deals done by the club that are one big puzzle for me.

Drogba was released then attempt to re-sing him in January.

Cole allowed to talk to others, then new contract was offered.

Frank was told he can leave, now the club realized he is still good, so open talks over a new deal is read about.

[kellzfresh 7,229]

I agree even 23 minutes for Piazon is better than no minutes at all.

Currently, Chelsea are very depleted squad. Certainly, some of these loans could have played, easily at Chelsea.

Quite honestly, there are several deals done by the club that are one big puzzle for me.

Drogba was released then attempt to re-sing him in January.

Cole allowed to talk to others, then new contract was offered.

Frank was told he can leave, now the club realized he is still good, so open talks over a new deal is read about.

I know chelsea is depleted now. But what if they get a rare chance and then they do even worse than marin, that will even make it worse for the young lad. Someone like marin will start for many of the loan clubs but is a little lower than chelsea level so far, meaning he can't get much game time in chelsea like most of our loan players. Only more matches always make young players better.

[bushman 2,043]

I know chelsea is depleted now. But what if they get a rare chance and then they do even worse than marin, that will even make it worse for the young lad. Someone like marin will start for many of the loan clubs but is a little lower than chelsea level so far, meaning he can't get much game time in chelsea like most of our loan players. Only more matches always make young players better.

Well, Marin to me is not good enough. So far, I have not seen anything out of him.

All I am saying for two days here. There are certain loans where Chelsea players are not playing regularly. Why is it so hard to understand ? Therefore, their development is not progressing much.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Well, Marin to me is not good enough. So far, I have not seen anything out of him.

All I am saying for two days here. There are certain loans where Chelsea players are not playing regularly. Why is it so hard to understand ? Therefore, their development is not progressing much.

Actually you said All Chelsea loans are fucking baffling and when you were challenged on it you just started bellyaching.

[bushman 2,043]

Actually you said All Chelsea loans are fucking baffling and when you were challenged on it you just started bellyaching.

Actually you are clueless. Just keep wanking.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Actually you are clueless. Just keep wanking.

Pathetic - still can't defend a point you made and lack the balls to admit you might have been wrong. In what way am I clueless on this issue? You think Bamford's loan has been pointless? What about the lads at Vitesse? Have they been pointless?

On second thoughts, don't try and talk about football. Just call me clueless instead.