Frank Lampard

[sdrcfc 461]

Decline the offer.

[sdrcfc 461]

You know what, this is like Poyet's move to Tottenham.

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

Hmm, after I re-think about it. I understand how some of you feels disappointed about this. After all the years he has with us and what Jose and Roman said to him, he could coming back to this club as whatever position he want, he do this. It is like he is saying, 'f*** all of that, I'm joining City, I do what I want', something like that.

Well, there are always some points to cheer about, first, he is going on loan and not permanent, I'll be gutted much more if it's permanent move. Second, it is City, I'll be more furious if its Pool, MU, Spurs, Arsenal or QPhaha. Third, it is 6 months, not one full season. Fourth, at the moment, I prefer Fabregas than Lamps any days.

From his perspective, I also could understand about it. It is not like NYC FC owner asking him, 'Mr. Lampard, our season starting next year, until then I'll let you train with any clubs you want, so which one do you want? Real Madrid? Barcelona? PSG? Milan? Bayern?' and then Lamps answer, 'Huh!? f*** all of them, I want Man City! It is always my dream to play wearing sky blue shirt'.

No, it is clear he is 'forced' to go to City. The only reason why he is not chosing Chelsea is because it is forbidden to do that, as Chelsea is a direct rival of Man City. The strong indication, I think, is from the rumour said that he don't want to play against Chelsea.

And why he is not chosing to go to Australia then? it seems like it is because he still want to play for England. I appreciate this, but to be honest, I think this is the root cause. He needs to stay fit and ready for MLS as well as remain competitive and keep an eye for England NT. If he has retired from England after WC, I'm almost certain he will joining Villa at Australia right now.

[Strike 7,217]

i don't feel good

[Hybrid Angel 2,130]

By no means I think we dumped Lampard. Lampard played for us until 36, and he is type of a player who deserves to finish his career where he is a top player at. Somewhere like the MLS. Since when legends leaving their club before retiring is called dumping them by the club? Evra, Vidic and Rio left United but no one is saying they dumped them.

I personally do not mind this too much although it bothers me quite a bit, but I understand why some are disappointed.

[Spike 12,049]

I will vomit.

[didierforever 7,349]

Don't think lamps will do that!!!! He is a proper chels!!!

[hjperdeath 2,226]

Villa was sent on loan to Melbourne. The only reason why Lampard is going to City is to piss Chelsea off. Saying that though, with the squad that City have, will he even play?

You've got that analogy wrong I think. Villa isn't English, so he won't help City in the HG quota while Lampard will. If Villa was English, he'd probably be at City too.

[ChelseaFC12 134]

What the hell Frank... Simply unimaginable..

[pWneR 230]

BBC reporting it too. Now I kinda have empathy for arsenal fans.

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

Frank Lampard: Man City set to sign ex-Chelsea player on loan

http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/28616101

Hope He will not play against us.

[Thendo 1,088]

To me Lamps will always be remembered as the legend he has been for us, all the memorable moments he has given us. But this city loan deal leaves kind of a bad taste in my mouth, seeing how he will join them, wear their jersey and contribute to them fighting us for the title...

[Thendo 1,088]

Dp.

[Rambo 1,729]

Just hope JT never does anything like this, a 'proper' chelsea ambassador. He'd be thinking of the fans, and how we'd react.

I can't see JT doing that, even the likes of Drogba and Ash would rather leave to another country than play for another PL club. Not so sure the level of involvement Lamps has got to do with this.

[Pacquiao 1,834]

Good luck to him. It makes sense why he would go there

not really, only reason why he would go there is because they have forced him to sign for them. Which is simply embarrassing.

[AndersonBLUE 819]

Don't really see the big deal. Man City own that club and Frank would want to stay fit till March.

[Pacquiao 1,834]

Don't really see the big deal. Man City own that club and Frank would want to stay fit till March.

would you still not see it as a big deal if throughout the season we are neck and neck with City and in Lampard's last game for them in march he scores a last minute winner for them to move above us which results in City winning the league by a point which then results in Jose getting sacked!

of course the chances of that actually happening are slim but while he is there its possible! so to see no big deal in Lampard playing for a title rival is bizarre to me..

[MichaelDance 552]

not really, only reason why he would go there is because they have forced him to sign for them. Which is simply embarrassing.

Maybe they hid something in the contract...