Jump to content

Samir Nasri to have Man City medical


luke.
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 411
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest justin_3d

Cheaper, younger, better than Modric. I'd be all for this transfer.Proven EPL class, and for half the price of Pastore, someone also with Champions League (group stage :Goober:) experience.

Proven EPL class???

Like Torres???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nasri is a goal scorer, not a creative midfielder. He likes to dribble the ball and try to smack one in, rather than pass it and get an assist. He is a great player, but do we need a goal threat from the midfield when we have Super Frankie Lamps?

07-08 was his best year 6 Goals and 15 Assists in all comps.

While in 10-11 he scored 15 times and only assisted 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest justin_3d

so we should never sign anyone from within the league now because Torres had a bad season? Great postwhistling.gif

Nope, but that is a poor excuse.

Just cause he is not or is proven EPL player...

got to take chances like we did with Ramires, Ivan and David Luiz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, but that is a poor excuse.

Just cause he is not or is proven EPL player...

got to take chances like we did with Ramires, Ivan and David Luiz.

He didnt make that as an excuse, in fact it was only one point of six but it is relative! EPL experience is always a good thing to have when signing a player. I dont think we have ever shirked from signing a player from outside the EPL anyway

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest justin_3d

He didnt make that as an excuse, in fact it was only one point of six but it is relative! EPL experience is always a good thing to have when signing a player. I dont think we have ever shirked from signing a player from outside the EPL anyway

And as i pointed out, we spend 50 mill on one player just cause he is PL experience, instead of spending less on Cavani or Falcao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as i pointed out, we spend 50 mill on one player just cause he is PL experience, instead of spending less on Cavani or Falcao.

Nope, i am pretty sure it is because Torres is one of the most recognized player in the world and he adds so much commercial revenue into the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as i pointed out, we spend 50 mill on one player just cause he is PL experience, instead of spending less on Cavani or Falcao.

you didnt actually point that out in that post tho.Dont think we ever announced that we spent 50 mill on Torres because of his PL experience did we? We spent 50 mill because he is a top class striker being touted not even 1 year ago as one of the best in the world and because that was the amount the dippers wanted for him! Plus you have already clearly wrote Torres off after his long spell herewhistling.gif, I prefer to wait till he has had a decent chance before using him as the yard stick to which all future possible failures will be judged

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest justin_3d

I'm sure that him being one of the top 5 strikers in the world had nothing to do with it.

Yeah but David Villa is better then him, and Barcelona spend less then we did on Torres....

Nope, i am pretty sure it is because Torres is one of the most recognized player in the world and he adds so much commercial revenue into the club.

So is Tevez, and he cost less then Torres for City.....

you didnt actually point that out in that post tho.Dont think we ever announced that we spent 50 mill on Torres because of his PL experience did we? We spent 50 mill because he is a top class striker being touted not even 1 year ago as one of the best in the world and because that was the amount the dippers wanted for him! Plus you have already clearly wrote Torres off after his long spell herewhistling.gif, I prefer to wait till he has had a decent chance before using him as the yard stick to which all future possible failures will be judged

Because he is not even worth that much. David Villa and Tevez have done better and cost less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but David Villa is better then him, and Barcelona spend less then we did on Torres....

So is Tevez, and he cost less then Torres for City.....

Because he is not even worth that much. David Villa and Tevez have done better and cost less.

Your completely missing the point here fella, its not like we sat down and thought... ok, Torres is a good player, lets pay 50 million pounds for him!!! THATS THE PRICE WE HAD TO PAY!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest justin_3d

Your completely missing the point here fella, its not like we sat down and thought... ok, Torres is a good player, lets pay 50 million pounds for him!!! THATS THE PRICE WE HAD TO PAY!

And we got screwed paying for him!

Could have used that money better on Cavani or beat Liverpool to Suarez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And we got screwed paying for him!

Could have used that money better on Cavani or beat Liverpool to Suarez.

Again thats your hasty assumption and its not factually accurate and wont be until he finishes playing here and then we can judge his worth! Ill be interested to hear your comments should he go out and hit 30 odd goals next season!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, i am pretty sure it is because Torres is one of the most recognized player in the world and he adds so much commercial revenue into the club.

Probably the best reply, not only his PL experience, but this also had a lot to do with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest justin_3d

Again thats your hasty assumption and its not factually accurate and wont be until he finishes playing here and then we can judge his worth! Ill be interested to hear your comments should he go out and hit 30 odd goals next season!

Again thats your hasty assumption and its not factually accurate and wont be until he finishes playing here and then we can judge his worth! Ill be interested to hear your comments should he go out and hit 30 odd goals next season!

30 odd goals is not worth the 50 mill price tag.

He was brought to win the CL, like Carlo. And so far his first season was disastrous.

Let's see what he can do in the new season.

Cause the 30 odd goals could be done by Falcao or Cavani and would cost less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...