Fernando

Well that video I put with some ex islamist radical answer some of that. The foundation of such religion is very shaky when it gives fruits to such organization. I don't care about the past, economic status and what not. Religion has been the problem for ages. Centuries ago it was Catholicism and now is Islam.

Yeah I'm definitely excited to see how they fare. They might be this new season what Liverpool was last season, but not for the tittle just top 4 contenders. Expect Liverpool to fall apart without Suarez. I do expect Arsenal to make it as always. So that battle for 4th spot will go between those of Liverpool, Tottenham and United. Everton won't be as good as last season I think.

Was watching this video about this guy that was a radical Islamist. And one thing that shock me was how he said he was trained to killed at such a young age as a child.

Similar to how blacks was under attack in the past and because of that anything people say is perceived as racist? Now as to per countries in poverty and such, isn't Nigeria always been poor? But recently that Islamic group of Boca Haram has appeared to demand things. Actually they have targeted Christian village and what not. The girls they kidnapped was Christian and forcing them to convert to Islam. So it seems to me that the radical Islam is spreading past the middle east to other parts of the world. And how do you know Christians are not oppressed? Do you have intelligence and article proving otherwise? Cause this article from Fox News says otherwise. Christians persecuted at alarming rate in Iran, Arab world, US report says http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/05/11/us-panels-report-documents-christians-under-siege-in-arab-world/

Was reading Barcelona comments on Suarez supposed Bite clause. lol that's so funny. That there's no such thing and what was very interesting is what he said about Suarez: "We didn't rethink the decision (to sign him) and we told Luis after the bite. He knows he did wrong. "He apologized. That's very important for us." It's very good to hear that Barcelona see this as a wrong thing and that Suarez had to admit. That's always the step in going to help an indiviual for his mistake not act like his the victim. Like it has happened at Liverpool and many Uruguayans players and people.

#Freedom4Ezdi #Freedom4Shinjar #Freedom4Kurdistan #Peacock4Kurdistan Question, since this seems to be pertaining to Iraq. Was Iraq better before USA came and invade the country? How you felt that state was during the USA occupation? And how you feel like it is today? So 3 different scenario, that I would like your opinion on them. Thanks.

One question to my Islamic friends. Why is there so much radical Islamic in this day and age? Countries like Iran that are heavily control by radical Islamic in which give no freedom but to follow their religion. I actually been hearing reports that Christians in countries like Iran are persecuted and such. Is this true?

If I'm not mistaken most people case for Mikel is to be a back up not a starter. We all know Matic is the best we got. But after him our back up was Ramires, Van Ginkel, Mikel and Romeu. So then we boil down to the other 3's since Ramires seems an untouchable for Mourinho... Out of these of Van Ginkel, Mikel and Romeu who is more apt to come and help us set up shop in an important fixture? Mikel seems like the guy to me. Hence why Mourinho and the club did the right thing in loaning Romeu out and keeping Mikel.

Your the epitome of a knee jerk reaction fan. I remember you calling Mourinho last year a traitor for being linked to the United job....

If I'm not mistaken wasn't the sponsorship deal of psg cut in half cause it was way out of the market? I'm not sure what city was but it was a normal figure compare to psg. So at least we know that uefa do look into this. As per buying other clubs in other countries is completely legit and actually smart in itself. Can't fault them for that when they have not break any rules.

They think that because Barcelona and United had a golden generation everyone should have it. But hey if it was that easy then why United has not had another one since class of 92? Why they must spend a lot of money now? Same goes for Barcelona, why they have to spend a lot of money on Suarez? Those are very unique cases where you get like 3 or 4 amazing players coming all at once. Cause realistically a youth coming from the club falls more in the ratio of 10 to 1. Is that low and rare to have a product from your youth come and be into the first 11. *This is mainly for a top club though. For a smaller club like Everton, Southampton, A. Villa and such is different.

I don't feel bad about the sell of Lukaku and Mata. I think they was good business and Mourinho had his input there. However I think Sturridge was a bit different. I think Mourinho might have kept him. It sucks he was sold one season before Mourinho came. Cause who doesn't miss watching his little dance?

He drop Ricardo, Lampard, Essien, cole and much more.

My only question is, if Mourinho is so ruthless then why he keeps playing Torres? Why doesn't he drop him like he did with Casillas? Send him to the reserves like with malouda.

We all know he sucks ass. But if Mourinho keeps using him then he better not say shit about having no striker come new season as it will be his fault. He should be giving the Malouda treatment simple as that. We should not be trying to play him in pre-season, it's a waste of time as that time can be use to up the conditions of other players.

Because of your awesome post Henrique I'm like:

Please put the quotes. Thank you.

So he held the club to ransom? Sounds like a Rooney case to me. [emoji57]

Wow some people here just crazy I tell you. No matter what Lampard does or goes he will always be a legend. And one day he will come back to the club as whatever he wants.

Been reading some articles about our policy with youths. Seems like a lot of butt hurts out there that we are doing such a good business.

Going to be fun, can't wait any longer!

I don't know about you guys, but I think Fabregas is much better then Mata. Fabregas is everything Mata never was for Mourinho. The flexibility he offers to play in different roles and his vision of passing is sublime. Mourinho is really a genius for getting rid of Mata at such a high price and get someone better for lesser price.

Actually FFP does not counts the youth academy expenditure. It's like a tax write off.

I actually think if Mourinho stays for some time at the club we would make a lot of money in the long run. Cause think about that one example at Real Madrid with Varane. How Mourinho was very influential in the growth of Varane in the years he was there? Say Mourinho has a positive impact in Zouma, Ake and such just by playing them here and there it will increase their value. Look at how people though highly of Kalas after "only" that game against Liverpool. So if this is something the board and Mourinho is on about, the profits will increase by implementing such role that Mourinho has talked about. Bringing two youths into the team every season. If so one happens to be outstandingly amazing then one of our seniors we will keep them. But this bringing of the youth into the team will increase the awareness and value of these youngsters. Destroying their careers? Hardly, we actually letting them use us as a platform to launch their careers forward if they don't stay at the club.

You can't ask for a Chelsea fan to give respect to a player who isn't his. Okay some might will, but on average most people will not care because he isn't ours. If Lukaku had stayed, I bet you everything would have been forgotten and people love the guy. Look at how Fabregas was hated here by many. Now that he's with us we support him. This is why I said it must be a Belgium thing defending him. But I guess I was wrong. It's just YOU!