Everything posted by Fernando
-
Did anyone notice the kid by Roman? David luiz look a like. ?
-
Yeah history trying to repeat itself again. Too early to tell, plus he started bad. With us he started on fire the second season and then fell apart after November....
-
Still feel our defense is shaky. Wonder if zouma will have the same impact that varane had at Madrid in displacing Pepe out.
-
How would it suit them if they don't win the league? It suits to whoever wins the league, and I see us winning the league not them.
-
Or people getting bored of easily predicting the two to get out. We want more groups of death. It's what makes the group stage fun. Anyhow if there's one thing to change I hope it's the away goal rules. That is one of the causes of producing the most boring Fútbol because the fear of conceding one goal and counting as twice the value...
-
Is it the guy who's now stating that Mourinho never had any intentions of ever going there but yet called him a traitor when he thought he was going there last summer?
-
Turkish Airlines rumoured to replace Samsung
Fernando replied to Waterfall's topic in Matthew Harding Stand
They would look awesome. The sexy brand of today though for me has to be Tesla. That's the one brand that is revolutionizing the industry of cars and would love to be acquainted with them. -
Turkish Airlines rumoured to replace Samsung
Fernando replied to Waterfall's topic in Matthew Harding Stand
I want one of the sexy and hip brands of today. Wheres Apple, Google, Tesla, Facebook and such? -
How does it feel being a minority Chelsea fan? Maybe being stereotypical, but I would think a lot of Mexicans would be fan of United, Real Madrid, Barcelona and what not?
-
Don't know. I did saw a guy with the name TOPB and was wondering if it was him. I guess it must have been his new account since he got banned. Anyhow Premier League - 'Gunner forever' Fabregas committed to Chelsea https://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/football-fabregas-im-committed-chelsea-150323503--sow.html
-
Because he will be used. He is still one of the fastest player in the team, and when playing a counter attacking style he will be good. Especially on second half when teams will be more tired. This season he will be more of a super sub ala Schurrle for Germany.
-
Yes that's true and people tend to overlooked that. We had an imbalance squad for the philosophy of Mourinho. Now that he sold that excess we will be back to square one in the coming transfer window. Meaning we will have to buy without much selling. This is where Mourinho must come good with implementation of younger players from the Academy. The club has spent a lot of money in this and will continue to do so, since this is one aspect that gets excluded from FFP calculations.
-
Uhmmmm Chelsea and Roman was the biggest backers of this FFP.
-
Well look on the bright side, now we can finally try to implement more of our youth academy players. In two or three years it will be more conducive.
-
So then Chelsea should just put him in the bench for a couple weeks to get rested and use Remy.
-
This guy seems very injury prone hey? Not a good sign for our long terms hope with him.
-
That goal, while only one game hopefully shows us of good things to come. If it was Torres he probably missed. So it does seems like a very nice upgrade. I was kinda not sure about this guy but anything over Torres was a must. Hope he can continue to bang those goals for his country and us. :blue scalf:
-
No I meant years ago. Chelsea was thinking of buying him and loaning him back to the Saints. Think that was around the year we won the CL. This is why someone with vision like Mourinho will give his further input into such things.
-
We all know the answer and people still managed to moan about it. We had no stability! We had Sturridge and years ago the board wanted to get Shaw on the cheap. This a lone shows that the board has actually been thinking about this. But when you had many managers and at the time we had Ryan who we didn't know what he could become it makes it hard. It is why managerial stability will help in this a lot. I never expected Mourinho to put any youth in his first season. He was trying to fit the pieces. Now that hes more comfortable we can start seeing a little bit of them. But realistically the bigger impact will be felt from next season onward if Mourinho stays with us for some time.
-
Yes but I will repeat I have no problem with such people. I include myself as a bandwagon person. I decided to follow Chelsea one of the top teams in the world around 07 or so. And ever since then this has been the only team I really follow.... Well to be more exact I wouldn't really follow the sport as much. I would watch some highlights here and there. So nothing hard core like watching a whole season for only one team. Now I watch every Chelsea match. If I missed it, I will download it via torrent. But in all I would still welcome a bandwagon person or someone that just came because we are the flavor of the month. Because you don't know if that person will become a fan for life as it happened with me. [emoji41]
-
Bandwagnors are people that jump to the most popular thing. We all started as Bandwagnors by choosing the top teams. But yes there's a difference in people staying through thick and thin. But the main point was that we started as that, therefore is ridiculous and hypocritical to call someone a Bandwagnors from a big team unless you was born and raised in that club. And the other point what you have to say? Your telling me that amongst the younger people the galácticos didn't became the best thing since slice bread? That revolutionized the modern game. It up their popularity around the globe exponentially. Was Fútbol popular in Asia 3 decades ago? USA? But that galácticos generated mass appeal even in the non Fútbol countries.
-
First of all I didn't said real Madrid became popular because of the galácticos. They was popular, but when the galácticos era came out changed the whole perception of Spanish team. It became the world best 11. People didn't care if they had players from Spain or not, what attracted more people to the club was the stars in one team. While loathed by others for buying the league and what not. So in the modern era that is what sparked the popularity amongst the younger people. Cause they can have great history like Ajax but if they don't revolutionized they will go the way of the dinosaurs. The galácticos changed the game into this modern we have now of having the world best 11 by paying big. And I don't get your point talking about the occasion fans. I have no problem with them. I just said that you shouldn't be bad mouthing them as that makes you a hypocrite.
-
I like you, but I don't think you should be bad mouthing bandwagoners and people going for the flava of the month since you have many teams you like. Real Madrid, inter and now Chelsea. Still like you, but just thought that was a bit hypocritical of you. I have no problem with such people by the way.
-
As squad players? Yes then that agree. However if we buy a player to be a squad player then people would still complain. This is why I don't think the club is buying any of them. It rather produce them and use them as a squad player.
-
For a top team that wants to rule all of Europe, yes! Hey its not our fault that England players have regressed. If anything England has to look at the German model because they must be doing something right.