Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Fernando

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,756

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

  • Country

    United States

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Fernando

  1. Fernando
    He says yeah a lot. lol
  2. Fernando
    I think he might get in trouble. You can just see it coming. It would be amazing if he doesn't get a silly red card this whole season.
  3. Fernando
    My word!
  4. Fernando
    Why hasn't the game started in Chelsea TV? Are they behind or something?
  5. Fernando
    Well I guess because it was the first time used. The outcome was so bad that Japan surrender and USA was so emotional torn because what they done that they forever helped Japan rebuild and be partners. And since then USA has never used such method ever again to end war. It would be irresponsible from USA to use such extreme again. They will avoid to ever use it again unless a nation strikes them first with a Nuclear weapon.
  6. Fernando
    No they actually left a militia there. If I remember correctly this whole ISIS started about two months ago, and the Iraqi had the militia fighting. Eventually they was overwhelm. USA is a last resort effort. And it seem like it has been since the Iraqi militia could not sustain it. I don't think USA needs to send troops in. They need to do what they are doing. Bombs certain targets, provide airlift support and send some key specialize individual to help counter terrorist insurgency.
  7. Fernando
    Yes I know, but I saw the same view in Colombia. The situation was miles better with Escobar at the helm. After he died many little drug cartels taken over led to many blood shed. It was very bad after he died, and took years to fix that problem. It's sad what it's happening in Iraq, but Iraqis as well other countries must help because the country does not have the infrastructure to sustain a democracy, or even socialism if that's your cup of tea. There's a lot of little organization trying to take power after Saddam. Yeah that's why I edited my statement. As I don't know much about Muslim but I know in Christianity such thing does not makes sense. Evil is evil. No matter how big or how small.
  8. Fernando
    Well if your Atheist then I guess you won't believe in that. But if you call yourself a Christian, Muslim or such then something wrong with that view. To be fair I don't know much about Muslim but I know in Christianity such thing does not makes sense. Evil is evil. No matter how big or how small.
  9. Fernando
    But it's a byproduct of having a regime as saddam like it was a byproduct all the violence and death in Colombia after Pablo Escobar death. When Pablo was alive a lot of things was rose and peaches. After It was very tough for many years. But today Colombia is a much more different country then it was back in 94. Now I do agree USA must help cause they had a hand in overthrowing saddam, and thank god they have started to help. But never being run by a dictatorship who runs wild like a drug cartel is the best option.
  10. Fernando
    I don't agree. Evil is evil, that's why for me your clearly being a hypocrite thinking one thing is more allowable then the other.
  11. Fernando
    You need to understand this clearly. There will never be better under such circumstances. Is just the illusion of something better. This is the same idea people used to say about Pablo Escobar. Because of how he gave back to the community, he kept crime in his area low but people never wanted to see the repercussion of such things, the repercussion of drugs. Have you ever seen the Two Escobars? If not I recommend it: http://youtu.be/6EilV9vgaEY
  12. Fernando
    This: there is no right or wrong in the lesser of two evil, just who perceives it as the lesser of two evil. For me evil is evil, no matter how little or how big. For you is acceptable. And just like you think is acceptable that's how many leaders of nations think. .ie Israel that nation your bashing.
  13. Fernando
    I never meant they was brute. I ask why would you say a nation wants to have a terrorist organization? Why they want to have a dictatorship? Because the people can't think for themselves? Are they brute or something? And that's what he's saying basically, if they can't rules themselves then they must be rule...
  14. Fernando
    That says it all what I been saying to you from beginning. In your view light it's the lesser of two evils. Simple.
  15. Fernando
    There's no comparison, I'm just saying your being a big hypocrite because you say one system of atrocities is better because of the benefits.This is exactly what USA says what drug cartels say, what Israel says, pretty much every nation. We provide peace, education and Why not. Again I say to you, your just being hypocrite justifying one thing and condemning the other just to make your point. Edit: And attempting to compare the complexity of the situation, you see it's mess up comparing Israel with Saddam. And I see your point of view here BUT how do you think I feel when you compare Saddam atrocities to something that happened in WW2? Those two are completely different situation and calling leaders from a nation as criminals in the same light of Saddam is really going over board. So who's being the hypocrite here?
  16. Fernando
    And likewise Israel will say the same thing. Really men your being a hypocritical saying one thing is better while this other is wrong.
  17. Fernando
    Yes according to what you said. Saddam tried to wipe certain people of the map but you said that's better then now. So for you that's the lesser of two evils.
  18. Fernando
    As a super sub. So what about capital one, fa cup, when a striker gets a red card. And truly I'm I the only that feels like Costa might get a red card here and there? Hence Torres is the second men till DD gets into rhythm. And that might take a couple of months.
  19. Fernando
    Yeah but there's a big difference in deliberately using chemical weapons in your own people. You are pretty much taking the role of the lesser two evils men. And this is the exact view that Israel takes when kids and such get killed. Like it was Hamas fault and they have to do it to save lives. The lesser of two evils, every country does it!
  20. Fernando
    What the heck your talking about men. I was asking him what is his view. My view is not that they are brute. I was asking why the need for dictatorship? Because the people are brutes? So it was a question to him not to you!
  21. Fernando
    The nuclear bombs on Japan....How can you use such example? It was WW2. It was a war. Hitler was elected and the people of Germany was able to take him out. This falls on the entire nation, in which the nation has vow to never forget. It's a crime to negate that the Holocaust happened in Germany. While in Turkey it's a crime to talk about the Armenian genocide... So the Germany nation learned from this and moved on. Can you say the same thing about a nation in the middle east your talking about? Can't really comment on the France thing. Vietnam was a war. Can't reprobate such outcome on the leaders. Now War crimes do happen in war, no one side is perfect. But the nation that is truly democratic will punish those who commit war crimes after the dust is settled. Can you say the same for dictators?
  22. Fernando
    Like how? What compares to Saddam mustard gas to a democrat using it on his people?
  23. Fernando
    You do know that dictators tend to commit war crimes, massacres and such as well? So your in fact admitting to having such condemnations for the better of the stability of the region?
  24. Fernando
    So because it's not ready for democracy then what are you saying about the nations? That they are Brutes?
  25. Fernando
    So the lesser of two evils hey?
×
×
  • Create New...