Amblève.

*Löw/Loew/Low.

Personally, I don't like the St James' Park concept at all but if it's the only option to redevelop the Bridge then I hope our architects make something iconic and unique out of it.

What an embarassement for a club of our magnitude... Turkish fucking Airlines. We're on the same level of sponsor's brand awareness and popularity as Liverpool.

Lmao, the team's aware of his support... the players probably can name his date of birth, the day he learned to walk, his first and last name etc too.

You shouldn't be typing posts from your armchair. Take your laptop and go to the Bridge, that's where real supporters post Chelsea stuff on the Internet.

A banner with Cech's silhouette and next to it the number of clean sheets he kept for Chelsea would be most fitting IMO.

If it's only a sprained ankle he should be okay in 4-6 weeks.

You build a house, put in the effort of building it with your bare hands and sweat and work months on it. As soon as it's finished you take out our lighter, set it on fire and in no more than an hour everthing's gone. Is it really about the little flame that destroyed everything then? Hell no. So no, it's not about the 2 points he cost us. I never even mentioned that to begin with. Signing that contract is the thought of burning everything down that it's about. When he signed that contract he knew what possibilities that clause could make happen. Frank fucking Lampard, one of the most intelligent footballers in today's game, knew EVERYTHING that could happen when he went through that contract with his agent. He knew it. And yet he dared to say yesterday that he "didn't expect to come on and score". He's lying to millions of Chelsea fans out there with no hesitation. That's my problem. Two times he broke his promise and now that he knows what he has caused he's trying to lie his way out it. After everything that he has done for this club he shows his true colors and they ain't mighty blue ones. I do hope he regrets what he's done but going by Jamie Rednapp's comments I very much doubt it. As for the "sitting down" part, you should read my initial post again. Loyality ≠ professionalism.

What does being a "top professional" have anything to do with being Chelsea's GOAT? I'm yet to see any argument in favor of that "top professional" statement I've come across dozens of times since yesterday, yet people talk about him being a top professional all the time. As far as I'm concerned, I'd rather Lampard behaved like the biggest unprofessional ever in the game of football if it meant him bleeding blue, but he didn't. He [a] signed a contract that included a loan clause sending him to City, Chelsea's biggest title rivals in the PL, he came on the pitch vs Chelsea, and [c] then he scored vs Chelsea. So again I ask what's the correlation between being a top professional and Chelsea's GOAT? Doing a, b, and c is being a professional. Refusing to sign that contract as long as the clause is part of it, refusing to play and even threatening Pellegrini to score an own goal if he used him vs Chelsea, and sitting down on the pitch after being subbed on vs Chelsea is bleeding blue. Yes, Lampard is a top professional but we shall forget never that day he betrayed the Chelsea family, 21.09.2014.

Reported every single one that's using insults as a response to stating an opinion.

Hope all of you being fine with everything Lampard did today were chanting and applauding when his shot hit the back of the net. Proper Chelsea fans.

Lampard's a football legend but a Chelsea legend he is not. Traitor.

Where's the fucking idiots saying Lampard won't play vs Chelsea?

The greatness of Joe Hart, too.

He'd be sitting on the bench.

Or, you know, a human being standing up (though in a wrong way) for another human being that's been mistreated.

Can anyone of those claiming Cahill's a top defender enlighten us why he's such a top defender and why his performances last season were not a product of the system we played?

Remember how we set up vs City last year?As already pointed out by several people, Cahill and Terry were protected by our defensive system. Cahill more so than Terry since the latter still has great anticipation to put himself in the right position 95% of the time. Cahill on the other hand...

Jose has to take the blame for this result. Starting Drogba in such an important game was a no-no from the get-go.

Keller is an absolute clown of a coach. Surely, he'll want to save his ass and his team but as per usual he'll overdo it. Winning comfortably vs Schalke should be a no-brainer tonight.

One could also argue that Dean might have been given the instructions "to do right" to Chelsea this time, if you believe in these kind of theories.

Correct. I would think that a more mobile CB pairing or a third central midfielder could cover for him though.

... which has been a pattern throughout his whole career. German fans want him out of their NT's first-11 constantly as Özil is the definition of a fair wheather footballer; good as long as the team plays well but if things are looking bad he'll look even worse.

Not improving an aging squad that lost Ballack, Carvalho, Belletti, Deco and J. Cole hurt us that season.

His celebrations are fucking class.