All Activity

First and foremost, is Moises Caicedo an avid reader of this site and part of the SPTC community!?…View the full article

He is not world class, but the flack he got on here was OTT. The amount of times I see people called him 'Badiashite' and names like that was not nice, but he has been brilliant for the past 2 games. When he first joined, he was actually really solid but then got hampered with injuries, however I really like his composure on the ball and his ability to pass between the lines. Decent amount of pace too. Hopefully his injury was just a knock and he is back after the international break, as he deserves his spot on the team.

And who would blame them? Our expenditure on alternatives since missing out on Olise has been a lot more than that.

Why you putting words on someone. Have you seen anyone protest on the streets about this recently? The ones that where enrage recently where the left that took to the street when the wade abortion was overthrown. And as you tipically do you think the right is the authoritarians all the time when the same happens with your leftist. To me they are both of the same coin. They each try to play the high moral ground when in truth they each try to force you to believe their ideologies.

And people complain that the WSL is a one team league. (Chelsea) Every once in a while a Dortmund or a Leverkausen come along to offer some camouflage but, in the end, the point of the Bundesliga is who's going to finish second.

Maignan ,Bastoni for Christmas .

I'd be surprised if he doesn't go back to Spurs for 1-2 seasons so that he can go for Shearer's record

the upcoming CF market is the simplest in years the only 5 (maybe 4 if you do not count Thuram as WC) world class CFs who will be even remotely available next summer: Julián Alvarez (Barca want him badly, he turns 27yo in the middle of next season) Lautaro Martínez (turns 29yo this coming summer) Victor Osimhen (turns 28yo in the middle of next season) Harry Kane (turns 33 this coming summer, but already has an insane 25 goals for club and country the past 3 and a half or so months) and maybe Marcus Thuram (turns 29yo this coming summer) (all 5 above will be crazy hard pulls and and none are 'BlueCo' young, they will all be or will turn 27, 28, 29, 29, and 33yo next season)

What a buzz when and after we scored, lifts the gloom and certainly proves attack is the winning form of a game. Thankfully the international break as dull as it may he is very welcome cause of all the injuries and needed breaks.

You would be instantly enraged if a left wing SCOTUS ruled that political speech that YOU favour was illegal and thus barred. As is typical with many authoritarians (of any ideological type, but especially commonplace amongst the right), you exhibit a 'rules for thee but not for me' stance.

I think this season first time since 1998-99 champions will have less than 80 points.

Only Rodri for City in the treble winning season can come close to the levels Caicedo is performing at. The best midfielder in the world at the moment imo

@King Kante a few months down the line... what is your opinion on Caicedo now? I think he is getting better and better. I am hoping to hear you have done a complete 360 and accept he is world class.

I agree with the Dissenting Opinions. I wonder if they bring it up now with a larger conservative judges if they would change it. I'm in favor of changing this.

United States v. Eichman (1990) was a Supreme Court case that struck down the Flag Protection Act of 1989, a federal law that criminalized flag desecration. The Court ruled 5-4 that the Act violated the First Amendment's guarantee of free expression, finding that the government's interest in protecting the flag was related to the suppression of free expression and the content of that expression. This decision reaffirmed the Court's earlier ruling in Texas v. Johnson (1989), which also found flag burning to be a protected form of symbolic speech. Background The Flag Protection Act of 1989: In response to the Texas v. Johnson decision, Congress passed the Flag Protection Act, which made it illegal to destroy or deface an American flag. The Protests: The case involved individuals who burned U.S. flags on the steps of the U.S. Capitol to protest government policies. The Supreme Court's Decision First Amendment Violation: The Court found that the Flag Protection Act was unconstitutional because it infringed on the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Content-Based Regulation: The Court determined that the government's interest in protecting the flag was directly related to the suppression of expression and the content of that expression. Strict Scrutiny: Because the law was a content-based restriction on speech, it had to be subjected to strict scrutiny, a high legal standard that the government could not meet. Reaffirmation of Texas v. Johnson: The Court's decision in Eichman essentially reaffirmed its holding in Texas v. Johnson, confirming that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment. Dissenting Opinions Justices William H. Rehnquist, Byron R. White, John Paul Stevens, and Sandra Day O'Connor dissented, arguing that the law did not truly infringe on First Amendment rights and that there were many other ways for demonstrators to exercise their rights.

Not sure. He did good but I thought he was a bit bad when coming to the press and help with defense. Some he help at other he was a bit of a worry for me. I don't think he is ready for the league yet and we should use him as a sub for now.

I agree with him. We should just let this whole suspension after yellow cards thing go, in any tournament or league. Doesn't improve the game at all, doesn't make it any more exciting or less unsportsmanlike, just a pain in the ass for players, clubs and fans.

All sides evolve but if there is one thing all of us here will agree on it's that it'll be a while before the club can build any hopes around Romeo's ability to stay fit. Meanwhile, all players have to earn their place in the squad, including Enzo. Whether we can afford, and can attract, an upgrade to our No. 8 are answers that we don't know but, if I was involved in the decision making, they are questions I'd definitely be asking.

by its very nature it is poltical speech, unless it is the method of disposal of an older, damaged flag (which of course, is not what is under discussion)

Who’s determined the fact burning a flag is political speech? Wonder if brits took to the streets of London burning Palestine flags anything would be done about it? Again act of political free speech right? But we both know they would be arrested and jailed

Nor would I want it, politicians are down there with dog shit and parking wardens and two tier kier is even further down than that, infact fuck it yeah free speech exists, next time some one says something you don’t like or agree with I suggest you remember this, their right to free speech beats your own right to be offended.

good to know where you stand thankfully you do not have the legal nor political power to try and enforce that horrid stance

Whether it is right or wrong is an opinion and not a determination of whether or not it is political speech. I also remind you of Evelyn Beatrice Hall's words (discussing Voltaire's views on free speech) from her 1906, London-published, book The Friends of Voltaire: 'I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.'

Free speech is bull shit, there is no such thing as free speech, you cannot say what u want these days, and i agree burning a flag is a disgrace, political or not if i caught some one burning an England flag id be putting the fire out with their head, oh wait they/them head because im not allowed to say if any one is a man or a woman any more without offending an entire set of nut balls, free speech eh 😂

Well we will have to wait and see if the supreme court ever decides to take up that matter with the input of Trump and company because as you alluded they make the law.