Jump to content

Stamford Bridge Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

That's why it's not viable. If it even had a capacity of 10,000 more, I'd say it's worth it, but that's purely from a location and atmosphere standpoint. Wembley is so far away from Stamford Bridge, I can see it being a pain to get to, and it just feels awkward to use Wembley as our home for so many games. If people aren't happy with the atmosphere at Stamford Bridge, I can see it being a library at Wembley just due to the sheer size of it. I hope I'm wrong.

You're completely right. However, Wembley is about 15 minutes away from my house, so I'm sorted for 3-4 years :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might be because they, the FA, have nothing to do with the actual Premier League fixture list. :)

Would the FA have to do something about it if Fulham aren't in the Premier League?

But right. I didn't know it was all on the Premier League for the fixtures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Unrelated to Stamford Bridge, but the NFL just agreed to play a minimum of 3 games a season at Twickenham starting in 2016. I'm sure that will get the Rugby-only people upset. It also shows that Twickenham won't refuse everything that isn't rugby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unrelated to Stamford Bridge, but the NFL just agreed to play a minimum of 3 games a season at Twickenham starting in 2016. I'm sure that will get the Rugby-only people upset. It also shows that Twickenham won't refuse everything that isn't rugby.

Fair point, although in fact the deal is for a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 games over a 3 year period, not 3 games a year. Still likely though that there would be a lot more resistance to Association football being played at rugby HQ than about gridiron or anything else.

More games they have, the more chance that Washington will come over so this is good news as far as I'm concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know why there isn't a postage option for tickets delivery for the match against Maccabi? only collection ?

Is this because they are reserivng the tickets for the fans who live in London?

Euro away match...pick them up at an allocated location before match with proof of i.d. etc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euro away match...pick them up at an allocated location before match with proof of i.d. etc

Cool, thanks.

And about this new forms that you have to fill out - there's space to write about your travel method FROM THE UK.

Does that mean away CL match tickets are only for UK based fans ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool, thanks.

And about this new forms that you have to fill out - there's space to write about your travel method FROM THE UK.

Does that mean away CL match tickets are only for UK based fans ?

no...am not doing this one but have they gone on sale to general public? Normally sold out, firstly to those on Euro scheme, then 60% ST's and 40% members. Are you one of those?

PS. just put any flight uk to tel aviv down if they insist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no...am not doing this one but have they gone on sale to general public? Normally sold out, firstly to those on Euro scheme, then 60% ST's and 40% members. Are you one of those?

PS. just put any flight uk to tel aviv down if they insist

Turns out they dont sell tickets to Israelis.. for security reasons.

Fucking hell.. it'll be such a shame to miss this match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

No it will be solely for our use. AFC want to return to their 'spiritual' home at Merton.

Granted the hope of a return to Plough Lane, albeit down the road a bit from their original ground, is why AFC are selling but there is still Kingstonians isn't there? Aren't they likely to want to carry on using the ground and wouldn't that put moral pressure, if not legal requirement, on us to accept them as sitting tenants?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Granted the hope of a return to Plough Lane, albeit down the road a bit from their original ground, is why AFC are selling but there is still Kingstonians isn't there? Aren't they likely to want to carry on using the ground and wouldn't that put moral pressure, if not legal requirement, on us to accept them as sitting tenants?

Good point. Though as with most of these things money talks, and if they dont stay will receive the buy out price I guess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...