🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Josh McEachran

[Styles 9,790]

That ^^^ article was actually written because somebody posted THIS THREAD on their site and linked them to page 66.

In yesterday's loan roundup, there was an interesting comment asking my thoughts on Josh McEachran
and his development. The comment directed us to a forum discussing his play at Middlesbrough, and I was just amazed at some of the laughable comment I was reading. There were some questioning his attitude, effort,
and work ethic, and all I could do was shake my head in amazement at their ridiculousness.

So go on own up, who did it?

[Leif 6,006]

I just want to point out that just because whoever wrote that piece on Josh is apparently a 'credible' writer who wants to be a journalist and because he has fancier words and better constructed sentences than most on here including myself, that does not mean he is 'correct'.

He states that what he read on here was laughable; as-if what posters such as myself have been saying is wrong - yet how can an opinion; which he's based his entire article on - then be right?

Football is and always has been a game of opinions. WAGNH is a great good site, but not everything on there is fact like so many seem to take their stuff for.

[Styles 9,790]

I just want to point out that just because whoever wrote that piece on Josh is apparently a 'credible' writer who wants to be a journalist and because he has fancier words and better constructed sentences than most on here including myself, that does not mean he is 'correct'.

He states that what he read on here was laughable; as-if what posters such as myself have been saying is wrong - yet how can an opinion; which he's based his entire article on - then be right?

Football is and always has been a game of opinions. WAGNH is a great good site, but not everything on there is fact like so many seem to take their stuff for.

Of course, tt's just a blog, I have never taken their opinions as fact or hold them in high regard because they have their own site. They post some interesting stuff from time to time but it's just a blog at the end of the day.

And I know their name is tongue in cheek but it's still shit.

[Blue Armour 4,439]

I had my reservations against him being loaned out to a championship side before this season began. And my opinion hasn't changed.

I feel he's a player who thrives on attacking runs made by intelligent players around him. Which is why I feel his best performances have come when he played with the first 11 at Chelsea.

[Leif 6,006]

Once again, dropped to the bench. No excuses. No 'he's tired', no 'they're resting him for a bigger game'. He simply doesn't show that determination the players have been showing around him to push for a promotion spot.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Once again, dropped to the bench. No excuses. No 'he's tired', no 'they're resting him for a bigger game'. He simply doesn't show that determination the players have been showing around him to push for a promotion spot.

He's just come back from illness hasn't he?

[Leif 6,006]

He's just come back from illness hasn't he?

Not too sure, but I believe he's only started 2 of Middlesbrough's last 7 or 8 games; all but 1 of which he started on the bench (the illness); this after starting so many games at the start of the season.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Not too sure, but I believe he's only started 2 of Middlesbrough's last 7 or 8 games; all but 1 of which he started on the bench (the illness); this after starting so many games at the start of the season.

Well Chalobah is on the bench today as well and has missed quite a few games for Watford. Shall we disown him as well?

The proper way to deal with young players in your squad is to give them rest more than older players because over-working them affects their development and consequently their whole career.

[Leif 6,006]

The proper way to deal with young players in your squad is to give them rest more than older players because over-working them affects their development and consequently their whole career.

He's 20 years old and only started 2 games in around 7 weeks or so. At 20 years old he should be bursting with energy and have great fitness. You don't rest a 20 year old for 5 weeks in football! Chalobah has been starting almost every single Watford game this season however, and actually merits a rest.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

He's 20 years old and only started 2 games in around 7 weeks or so. At 20 years old he should be bursting with energy and have great fitness. You don't rest a 20 year old for 5 weeks in football! Chalobah has been starting almost every single Watford game this season however, and actually merits a rest.

That is not the whole picture. The way I remember it, Josh had a slight hamstring problem, he returned to the starting XI then was benched for two match (he played the whole second 45 mins in the second) then he returned to the starting line up where he had a fantastic game in a 1-0 win against league leaders, Cardif, then he missed 2 games for illness and today he's back on the bench.

[didierforever 7,349]

He's 20 years old and only started 2 games in around 7 weeks or so. At 20 years old he should be bursting with energy and have great fitness. You don't rest a 20 year old for 5 weeks in football! Chalobah has been starting almost every single Watford game this season however, and actually merits a rest.

you seem to have some problem with our youth players... i remember reading some of your ridiculously hilarious comments on lukaku at the start of the season and look how that panned out. as for josh, u dont have to be a genius to figure out that he has stamina related problems but as far as his performances are concerned, u r way too harsh on him.

[Leif 6,006]

i remember reading some of your ridiculously hilarious comments on lukaku at the start of the season

Name one.

[didierforever 7,349]

Name one.

"Does anyone remember me taking the piss and saying we should loan him to Vitesse?

Silly me. I actually believe we should now!"

"LET'S LOAN HIM TO VITESSE AND THEN LOAN HIM TO WIGAN AND THEN SELL HIM! WOOOO!!!!"

and this is after i just RANDOMLY went to the lukaku thread, went on page 50 so as to reach somewhere in preseason and scanned a couple of pages.

[Leif 6,006]

"Does anyone remember me taking the piss and saying we should loan him to Vitesse? Silly me. I actually believe we should now!" "LET'S LOAN HIM TO VITESSE AND THEN LOAN HIM TO WIGAN AND THEN SELL HIM! WOOOO!!!!" and this is after i just RANDOMLY went to the lukaku thread, went on page 50 so as to reach somewhere in preseason and scanned a couple of pages.

The sarcasm in those 2 quotes are so clear. Does "WOOOO!!!!" really shout "I'm being serious right now"? The only comments I made regarding him were his poor 1st touch (which no one can deny) and the fact that being compared to Drogba is the most stupid thing and is only done due to his physique and ethnicity - they are nothing alike as players.

[didierforever 7,349]

The sarcasm in those 2 quotes are so clear. Does "WOOOO!!!!" really shout "I'm being serious right now"? The only comments I made regarding him were his poor 1st touch (which no one can deny) and the fact that being compared to Drogba is the most stupid thing and is only done due to his physique and ethnicity - they are nothing alike as players.

"From what I've seen and heard of Lukaku, he's a

bully outside of football, and is extremely disrespectful. He removed

the status (i think) after an intense back lash, but after our game vs.

Bayern, he joked about some people who had died in Munich a few decades

ago or something (I know such a serious topic shouldn't be spoken about

so vaguely, but I can't remember exactly what he said).

The big smile of his just hides what he truly is I fear. He likes playing the victim. Liverpool should have bought him."

do u actually want me to believe u like lukaku after all your comments are anti him. as for the comments i gave before were after chelsea pre-season game when he did not perform as people expected and wanted him to. the comments previous and after yours are just like yours, so do u really want me to believe they are sarcastical.

anyways my main point out of the 1st statement i made towards u is, dont judge josh so early. he is only 20. for me, he deserved to be a part of the squad here especially considering how thin we are.

[Leif 6,006]

do u actually want me to believe u like lukaku

Not really, no.

[didierforever 7,349]

Not really, no.

not suprising...

[themightyblue 443]

"From what I've seen and heard of Lukaku, he's a

bully outside of football, and is extremely disrespectful. He removed

the status (i think) after an intense back lash, but after our game vs.

Bayern, he joked about some people who had died in Munich a few decades

ago or something (I know such a serious topic shouldn't be spoken about

so vaguely, but I can't remember exactly what he said).

The big smile of his just hides what he truly is I fear. He likes playing the victim. Liverpool should have bought him."

do u actually want me to believe u like lukaku after all your comments are anti him. as for the comments i gave before were after chelsea pre-season game when he did not perform as people expected and wanted him to. the comments previous and after yours are just like yours, so do u really want me to believe they are sarcastical.

anyways my main point out of the 1st statement i made towards u is, dont judge josh so early. he is only 20. for me, he deserved to be a part of the squad here especially considering how thin we are.

Wow. What an accusation to make.

Give Josh time. We're always too quick to dismiss. Not all players become stars at the age of 20 or below

[English Freak 456]

Josh needs another 2 seasons out on loan...then he might be ready for a rotational role at Chelsea..

[zolayes 14,489]

Josh needs another 2 seasons out on loan...then he might be ready for a rotational role at Chelsea..

agree ,,can't see him being our numero uno