Who would you rather?

[We Hate Scouse 10,326]

We have been linked with both Aguero and Pato over recent weeks, but surely we can't sign them both! Who would you rather Chelsea sign?

I would rather Aguero I think he is a more complete player.

Edit: Added Villa

Edited April 27, 2010 by we hate scouse

[stif 0]

Pato

[Manuf 1,448]

Pato, no doubt.

[DYC. 7,542]

Aguero

Pato is too light for the Premier League if you ask me. And he is way too injury prone. It would be a waste of money, paying something like 50 mil pounds for an injury prone player. Also, he isnt having his best season.

Aguero is small but strong and he isnt too injury prone. He too isnt having his best season but Atletico isnt having a good season. Very inconsistent. But he has proven in the past that he is a great player and has a bright future. And like we hate scouse said, he is more complete.

[Term-X 7,891]

Pato won't even be an option, not even a 0.1% chance milan will let us near him.

[Kez 2,727]

Aguero.

[Term-X 7,891]

anelka would have to be sold either way, and from what carlo said about not wanting torres i doubt anelka will be going anywhere

[Rambo 1,729]

Sergio for me

[Badboy 1,526]

Aguero can dribble his way into the box from tight areas of the pitch. Pato's pace and movement and raw abilty to finish with both feet and with his head edges it for me. I think daniel sturridge will be a really good striker soon, he has real pace and is very similar too pato (style wise) plus he can finish too.

Edited April 25, 2010 by Badboy

[Randall 315]

Ageuro

[neel 257]

Aguero

[Steve 10,227]

Aguero only because i think we are missing that small striker that can weave his way through players into the box.