We need a new stadium

[Kez 2,727]

so as usual I'm right

You need to get over yourself and learn to listen to other people's posts when they make a point. You would see that alot of the time you're wrong.

[NattyBlue 44]

Don't want to move

In all fairness our stadium isn't that bad capacity size anyway, anfield only has a few more thousand than us.

Just change the crowd

[Badboy 1,526]

The only thing is i really dont think roman would agree to us doing a demolition job on the hotels. The hotels as shed head has already said probably generate a lot more cash then what an expansion would.

[the wes 7,212]

Don't want to move

In all fairness our stadium isn't that bad capacity size anyway, anfield only has a few more thousand than us.

Just change the crowd

so would you be happy to see spurs have a bigger stadium than Chelsea

[Laylabelle 9,381]

Meh they can have their staduim.We'll have the trophies they have the bigger staduim

A move duno be bad I reckon mean Arsenals new staduim is just depressing really and in such a random place!Just looks kinda plonked randomly

Expansion be idea but pretty much impossible unless can find a way around the exit problem and fit another so hmm

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Who gives a fuck about Spurs having a bigger stadium than us? Liverpool, Villa, Arsenal, Sunderland and Newcastle have bigger grounds than us, but does that make them more successful?

[NattyBlue 44]

Indeed, they can have a nice new stadium like le arse and no trophies to put in it.

[northernblue 2]

Who gives a fuck about Spurs having a bigger stadium than us? Liverpool, Villa, Arsenal, Sunderland and Newcastle have bigger grounds than us, but does that make them more successful?

Exactly, its the trophy cabinet that matters, forking out for these soulles domes can often do more harm than good. Spurs have done nothing in the league for years and I can't see a shiny new stadium changing that

[Mart 29]

Lets hope it bankrupts them tbf.

[Cameron 30]

We should not be moved - most certainly agree with everything written there.

[BluesChick 1,260]

I'm with Blue Lion... why do we need a new stadium??? So the team can be in debt or indebted to some company??? Stamford Bridge is our home and we need to stay put!!

[Shane 2,275]

I'd prefer a new Stadium.

Bigger Stadium = Bigger Income

and we can have a proper shed end without the away fans in there, Samsung Stadium sounds like a modern name.

Ask Arsenal fans if they'd rather Highbury or The Emirates.

[Badboy 1,526]

, Samsung Stadium sounds like a modern name.

:clown:

[Shane 2,275]

:clown:

Fuck off you clueless prick

[Cameron 30]

I'd prefer a new Stadium.

Bigger Stadium = Bigger Income

and we can have a proper shed end without the away fans in there, Samsung Stadium sounds like a modern name.

Ask Arsenal fans if they'd rather Highbury or The Emirates.

Although it'd cost at least 400m to build and there seems no obvious locations for it to be built. We can move the away fans out of the shed now, we don't need a new stadium to do that, trouble is it doesn't look like the clubs planning to do that either.

Samsung Stadium? Get out!

[middleoftheshed 388]

Ask Arsenal fans if they'd rather Highbury or The Emirates.

99% of them would say Highbury

I spoke to an Arsenal fan before the last match we played at SB and he and all his match going mates hate it. Highbury, as we all know, was a library but at least it had character. The Emirates really is horrible.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Although it'd cost at least 400m to build and there seems no obvious locations for it to be built. We can move the away fans out of the shed now, we don't need a new stadium to do that, trouble is it doesn't look like the clubs planning to do that either.

Samsung Stadium? Get out!

Spot on.

[middleoftheshed 388]

New Chelsea chief executive Ron Gourlay has revealed that the club would consider naming rights for Stamford Bridge.During an exclusive interview with Chelsea TV tonight, his first since succeeding Peter Kenyon, Gourlay made it clear that such a deal would be possible on the proviso the name Stamford Bridge was retained in any agreement with a suitable blue-chip company.

'Retaining the heritage of the stadium is paramount to considering such a move but we think that is achievable and on that basis we would enter into discussions over naming rights with the right partner for Chelsea,' said Gourlay.

'We understand that this is a sensitive issue for our fans and that is why we would keep the name Stamford Bridge in any deal.

'What we are not prepared to happen, and I am sure our fans will appreciate this, is allow our rival clubs in England and Europe to gain a competitive advantage over us in terms of the revenue they can generate through either expanding the capacity of their existing stadia or moving to a new stadium and then invest that upside in their team or the club.

'Those possibilities are not open to Chelsea for the foreseeable future because of the restrictions in expanding our stadium and the issues around finding a new site, so that means we have to be creative and look at our sponsorship architecture and see if we can create new value and new opportunities that keeps us competitive.

'Our stadium does very well at the moment in competing with the bigger, and in some cases newer, stadia of our rivals. But they have more possibilities in the long run than we do. We cannot sell anymore tickets to Chelsea fans as we sell out virtually every match within our limited capacity.

'The match day experience at Stamford Bridge and the relationship with our fans has improved greatly through initiatives such as our flexible ticketing policy for all cup matches, the freezing of non-hospitality ticket prices for the last four seasons for Premier League matches and subsidised or free travel to a significant number of away games.

'But we need to keep evolving and move the business forward to support the football side and the club generally. This is a potentially realistic way of doing that.'

get fucked