Badboy 1,526 Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 The only thing is i really dont think roman would agree to us doing a demolition job on the hotels. The hotels as shed head has already said probably generate a lot more cash then what an expansion would. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted October 28, 2009 Author Share Posted October 28, 2009 Don't want to move In all fairness our stadium isn't that bad capacity size anyway, anfield only has a few more thousand than us.Just change the crowd so would you be happy to see spurs have a bigger stadium than Chelsea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,534 Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 Meh they can have their staduim.We'll have the trophies they have the bigger staduimA move duno be bad I reckon mean Arsenals new staduim is just depressing really and in such a random place!Just looks kinda plonked randomlyExpansion be idea but pretty much impossible unless can find a way around the exit problem and fit another so hmm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 Who gives a fuck about Spurs having a bigger stadium than us? Liverpool, Villa, Arsenal, Sunderland and Newcastle have bigger grounds than us, but does that make them more successful? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NattyBlue 44 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 Indeed, they can have a nice new stadium like le arse and no trophies to put in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northernblue 2 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 Who gives a fuck about Spurs having a bigger stadium than us? Liverpool, Villa, Arsenal, Sunderland and Newcastle have bigger grounds than us, but does that make them more successful?Exactly, its the trophy cabinet that matters, forking out for these soulles domes can often do more harm than good. Spurs have done nothing in the league for years and I can't see a shiny new stadium changing that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mart 29 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 Lets hope it bankrupts them tbf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cameron 30 Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 We should not be moved - most certainly agree with everything written there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluesChick 1,260 Posted October 31, 2009 Share Posted October 31, 2009 I'm with Blue Lion... why do we need a new stadium??? So the team can be in debt or indebted to some company??? Stamford Bridge is our home and we need to stay put!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 2,275 Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I'd prefer a new Stadium.Bigger Stadium = Bigger Incomeand we can have a proper shed end without the away fans in there, Samsung Stadium sounds like a modern name.Ask Arsenal fans if they'd rather Highbury or The Emirates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboy 1,526 Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 , Samsung Stadium sounds like a modern name.:clown: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 2,275 Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 :clown:Fuck off you clueless prick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cameron 30 Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I'd prefer a new Stadium.Bigger Stadium = Bigger Incomeand we can have a proper shed end without the away fans in there, Samsung Stadium sounds like a modern name.Ask Arsenal fans if they'd rather Highbury or The Emirates.Although it'd cost at least 400m to build and there seems no obvious locations for it to be built. We can move the away fans out of the shed now, we don't need a new stadium to do that, trouble is it doesn't look like the clubs planning to do that either.Samsung Stadium? Get out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
middleoftheshed 388 Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Ask Arsenal fans if they'd rather Highbury or The Emirates.99% of them would say HighburyI spoke to an Arsenal fan before the last match we played at SB and he and all his match going mates hate it. Highbury, as we all know, was a library but at least it had character. The Emirates really is horrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Although it'd cost at least 400m to build and there seems no obvious locations for it to be built. We can move the away fans out of the shed now, we don't need a new stadium to do that, trouble is it doesn't look like the clubs planning to do that either.Samsung Stadium? Get out!Spot on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
middleoftheshed 388 Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 New Chelsea chief executive Ron Gourlay has revealed that the club would consider naming rights for Stamford Bridge.During an exclusive interview with Chelsea TV tonight, his first since succeeding Peter Kenyon, Gourlay made it clear that such a deal would be possible on the proviso the name Stamford Bridge was retained in any agreement with a suitable blue-chip company.'Retaining the heritage of the stadium is paramount to considering such a move but we think that is achievable and on that basis we would enter into discussions over naming rights with the right partner for Chelsea,' said Gourlay.'We understand that this is a sensitive issue for our fans and that is why we would keep the name Stamford Bridge in any deal.'What we are not prepared to happen, and I am sure our fans will appreciate this, is allow our rival clubs in England and Europe to gain a competitive advantage over us in terms of the revenue they can generate through either expanding the capacity of their existing stadia or moving to a new stadium and then invest that upside in their team or the club.'Those possibilities are not open to Chelsea for the foreseeable future because of the restrictions in expanding our stadium and the issues around finding a new site, so that means we have to be creative and look at our sponsorship architecture and see if we can create new value and new opportunities that keeps us competitive.'Our stadium does very well at the moment in competing with the bigger, and in some cases newer, stadia of our rivals. But they have more possibilities in the long run than we do. We cannot sell anymore tickets to Chelsea fans as we sell out virtually every match within our limited capacity.'The match day experience at Stamford Bridge and the relationship with our fans has improved greatly through initiatives such as our flexible ticketing policy for all cup matches, the freezing of non-hospitality ticket prices for the last four seasons for Premier League matches and subsidised or free travel to a significant number of away games.'But we need to keep evolving and move the business forward to support the football side and the club generally. This is a potentially realistic way of doing that.'get fucked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millzy_chelsea_fan 4 Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 this is bull shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cameron 30 Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 It's good he understands the importance of 'Stamford Bridge' to us the supporters, and it'll always be in our name (at least while we stay at the current ground). Considering any sort of a deal would still have it in, I can't imagine it making too much of a difference to the name and all us would still refer to it as SB anyway. Football's becoming more and more about business, and I guess we'll just have to accept that notion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kez 2,727 Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 Fucking joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueboy 14 Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 No, no no no:fainthv9:. For fuck's sake.:censored: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.