The Transfer Ban

[Laylabelle 9,337]

So we can have Di Santo back but they havent decided if we can have Mancienne back or not?

Fucking hell!

And yeh be a hell of a lot sweeter and hopefully even more this will spur us on.

[.Cee 50]

tribalfootball.com

sorry carlo its not going happen we are fucked thanks to are sporting director

Easy to put the blame on him, when it's not his job to actually negotiate contracts as he's basically a scout.

Regardless, FIFA

[Ray. 217]

The fact that we have a 100 % winning streak with Carlo so far makes me think we haven't got anything to worry about and that we can continue our success. He comes from one of the top football nations in the world and so has a deep understanding of the game and has the knowledge and wisdom to push the squad to further success.

[chelsea blue 615]

FIFA RULE OUT Chelsea LOAN RECALLS

Posted 12/09/09

FIFA have told Chelsea they cannot recall any players on season-long loans under the terms of their transfer ban.

Itis another body blow for the English club who were banned from signingany new players during the next two transfer windows when FIFA foundthem guilty of inducing teenager Gael Kakuta to breach his contractwith Lens two years ago.

Although the Blues intend to appealagainst the punishment, coach Carlo Ancelotti was hoping to minimisethe damage by recalling England Under-21 defender Michael Manciennefrom Wolves, forward Scott Sinclair from Wigan and Argentinian strikerFranco di Santo from Blackburn.

Di Santo can return, as hisagreement was only for half the season. But Sinclair's was for the fullseason and in Mancienne's case, FIFA will have to rule on whether an"emergency release clause" can be applied.

"If it's a season-long loan, it cannot be terminated in order to bring players back," said a FIFA spokesman.

Theclub expect to hear from the sport's world governing body in the next10 days with their full reasoning behind the transfer ban.

TheBlues then have 21 days to respond. Should their appeal fail, andfurther injuries occur in the next few months, they could be left shortof players, particularly with the expected loss of Didier Drogba,Michael Essien, John Obi Mikel and Salomon Kalou to the African NationsCup in January.

[ZanSnake 1,211]

This is really showing how anti-Chelsea they really are. For fucksake, they are on Chelsea contracts, so they should be named as a Chelsea player, we are the parent club. The more this kind of shit goes on, the more obvious it is that UEFA and FIFA are corrupt.

[.Cee 50]

Ok, well, what about after the season-long loan is over? They will be registered as our players next season, won't they?

[5354 204]

this is seriously drastic.

what the hell is wrong with these people.

[Kez 2,727]

Ok, well, what about after the season-long loan is over? They will be registered as our players next season, won't they?

Makes sense they can't just take our players off us.

Edited September 12, 2009 by Kez

[Aesthetic Relic 301]

Ok, well, what about after the season-long loan is over? They will be registered as our players next season, won't they?

Officially they are our players, but to play for us they need to be registered to play for that particular season. If they play for someone else, they hold the players registration for that season or for the period of the loan deal.

I'm not 100% sure if you have to re-register a player each season or not, but I think we should be able to play them opnce the loan deal has elapsed.

This information is not something new, its basically a continuation of the original rule reguarding playing registered players. Nothing has changed.

[caesarblues 51]

FIFA so fucked up  

they do anything to stop us from winning!

[Alee. 182]

ROFLMAO

[Laylabelle 9,337]

in Mancienne's case, FIFA will have to rule on whether an"emergency release clause" can be applied.

.................

Well we know what way thats gana go

On talkshit duno how much truth was into it someone not sure who was trying make it so we couldnt even be allowed to appeal and that the decison should just stick.However it was overuled.But duno how much truth there is to it but thank god if so however said no!

But like said the way things keep getting added to the ban what next?

Edited September 12, 2009 by Laylabelle

[zolayes 14,489]

idea for FIFA ....players returning from injury banned ...so no Joe Cole or Deco

[TrueChelseaBlue 105]

Bastards, Hope we have got that evidence Chelsea say theyve got, and can prove we done anything 'under-hand' that'll make FIFA look absolute twats

Think its pretty sad an organization such as FIFA targetting Chelsea, nothing better to do, obviously..

It's pathetic!

and not allowed to recall our own players? stupid!

[Ray. 217]

They obviously want to set an example and that's what they're doing. I think it's disgraceful and shouldn't be aloud to happen.

Edited September 12, 2009 by Blueray

[TrueChelseaBlue 105]

Anythings allowed to happen when its FIFA doing it.

[chelsea blue 615]

If you have a recall option in the loan deal you can get the player back at any time if not we have no hope

[TrueChelseaBlue 105]

Yep pretty much, Were appealing anyway, hope FIFA are ready to look like fools.