Sergio Aguero joins the other Manchester club

[Kojo 4,676]

We spent millions for players like Cech, Drogba, Essien, Carvalho etc..They've spent it on Lescott, Barry, Milner, Balotelli, Boateng, Adebayor, Bridge etc..We were winning trophies and were in the top 4 before we were bought, unlike City. No trophies in 35 years and were 10th when they were oiled out.

Totally agree with that!, at least in some way, we deserved the money, just like Newcastle did since they were contenders.

[Beast 85]

Totally agree with that!, at least in some way, we deserved the money, just like Newcastle did since they were contenders.

Even Blackburn spent their money wisely in 1994-95 when they won the league.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

We spent millions for players like Cech, Drogba, Essien, Carvalho etc..They've spent it on Lescott, Barry, Milner, Balotelli, Boateng, Adebayor, Bridge etc..We were winning trophies and were in the top 4 before we were bought, unlike City. No trophies in 35 years and were 10th when they were oiled out.

Whilst they've also got players like Tevez, David Silva, Joe Hart, Aleksandr Kolarov, Vincent Kompany, Edin Dzeko, Nigel de Jong and Yaya Toure who are all, IMO, either world class or very talented footballers.

Every team makes some shit signings, and some brilliant ones.

[Randall 315]

There is an upside to this, I'd rather we played against Aguero than Tevez, I still feel Tevez is a more dangerous player. If they have both though we're fuckity fucked.

[Fulham Broadway 17,306]

There is an upside to this, I'd rather we played against Aguero than Tevez, I still feel Tevez is a more dangerous player. If they have both though we're fuckity fucked.

Agree with that theres a feeling amongst South American commentators that Aguero has peaked. Tevez is just a killer in front of goal and wished we signed him couple of years ago.

[Guest justin_3d]

Totally agree with that!, at least in some way, we deserved the money, just like Newcastle did since they were contenders.

There is no such thing as deserved. Money goes where it wants to go.

In time Chelsea money will dry out, and most fans will turn like Liverpool fan and will only talk about the past.

This is a cycle!

[Term-X 7,891]

There is no such thing as deserved. Money goes where it wants to go.

In time Chelsea money will dry out, and most fans will turn like Liverpool fan and will only talk about the past.

This is a cycle!

That's not guaranteed. Many clubs have had long extended periods of success, hopefully when Roman pops his clogs he will leave the club to his son.

You seem to glee in all things anti-chelsea, you despise Mourinho (our greatest ever manager) and frown upon everyone who has a bad word to say about City.

[Guest justin_3d]

That's not guaranteed. Many clubs have had long extended periods of success, hopefully when Roman pops his clogs he will leave the club to his son.

You seem to glee in all things anti-chelsea, you despise Mourinho (our greatest ever manager) and frown upon everyone who has a bad word to say about City.

Leeds United, Notinhgam, Blackburn itself and much more.

It's a cycle. Money flows in, money flows out.

Yes I don't like Mourinho. But our greatest manager ever??? Maybe in the Roman era, cause we don't know how well past great manager would have done with all that money he got.

And frown about a bad word about City? Cause as I said, they have the right to do what they want cause we did the same....

[Term-X 7,891]

Leeds United, Notinhgam, Blackburn itself and much more.

It's a cycle. Money flows in, money flows out.

That's not the case with every club, I see no reason why it's 100% guaranteed to happen with Chelsea.

Yes I don't like Mourinho. But our greatest manager ever??? Maybe in the Roman era, cause we don't know how well past great manager would have done with all that money he got.

What?.. you do realise that makes no sense, Mourinho is our greatest ever manager. I deal with facts, you just spouted hypothetical bullshit.

And frown about a bad word about City? Cause as I said, they have the right to do what they want cause we did the same....

Our owner never bypassed the financial fair play rules by agreeing a sponsorship deal with himself. Which is essentially what City have done.

[J.F. 1,484]

remember this ?

[Beast 85]

remember this ?

40M Aguero>>>50m Torres

[Guest justin_3d]

That's not the case with every club, I see no reason why it's 100% guaranteed to happen with Chelsea.

What?.. you do realise that makes no sense, Mourinho is our greatest ever manager. I deal with facts, you just spouted hypothetical bullshit.

Our owner never bypassed the financial fair play rules by agreeing a sponsorship deal with himself. Which is essentially what City have done.

Can happen, can not.

But as i said, there is no deserve in this game. The money flows where it wants to go.

Second it does makes sense. You give a man so much money and he is bound to win a lot of stuff and be a greatest manager ever.

Look at City and their money. Have not won nothing in a long time, so just because Mancini took them to the CL and won a FA Cup he is the greatest ever?

Please you can't distort the previous manager that did good with such little budget to the current one.

It is why I say post and pre roman. That much money distort everything.

And for bypassing the deal, i don't think so. Etihad is an airline that will also get massive revenue boost from this deal, cause their marketing will be expanded with City.

I see it as a win win situation. A very clever deal by my books.

[Domino- 116]

What's so like him to Aguero?

I prefer to stay with the available strikers instead take Aguero not see what is there that can give huge amounts of it more salary than Terry and Lampard

[Term-X 7,891]

Can happen, can not.

But as i said, there is no deserve in this game. The money flows where it wants to go.

Second it does makes sense. You give a man so much money and he is bound to win a lot of stuff and be a greatest manager ever.

Look at City and their money. Have not won nothing in a long time, so just because Mancini took them to the CL and won a FA Cup he is the greatest ever?

Please you can't distort the previous manager that did good with such little budget to the current one.

It is why I say post and pre roman. That much money distort everything.

Mourinho is our greatest ever manager for many reasons. Trophy's, talent, and the historical significance of his reign and the impact he made.

so just because Mancini took them to the CL and won a FA Cup he is the greatest ever?

Well, as far as 'success' goes...

Ted Drake only managed 1 league title in 10 years. So technically Jose' is the greatest manager the club has had.

Man-City have had better managers than Mancini, once upon a time they won the league.

And for bypassing the deal, i don't think so. Etihad is an airline that will also get massive revenue boost from this deal, cause their marketing will be expanded with City.

I see it as a win win situation. A very clever deal by my books.

Ethiad have never made a profit, the deal is criminal, it's owned by the same family who own Man-City.

They've quite literally made a deal with themselves.

[Guest justin_3d]

Mourinho is our greatest ever manager for many reasons. Trophy's, talent, and the historical significance of his reign and the impact he made.

Well, as far as 'success' goes...

Ted Drake only managed 1 league title in 10 years. So technically Jose' is the greatest manager the club has had.

Man-City have had better managers than Mancini, once upon a time they won the league.

Ethiad have never made a profit, the deal is criminal, it's owned by the same family who own Man-City.

They've quite literally made a deal with themselves.

Vialli???

He did good with the little he had.

How much more will he had done with the money Mourinho had?

We will never know, it is why all that money from Roman distort previous work from managers.

Again Vialli did a lot with the budget he had.

As far as the deal being criminal how do you know? Are you a judge?

That is your view, but as far as i know, there is nothing wrong.