The Next Manager?

[Fernando 6,585]

37 minutes ago, milan.cech said:

This comes from an Italian lifelong Juventus fan after I asked him about Conte. He is my current boss and trust me, he knows hell of a lot about football.

 ______

He's very good but pushes too much....it can be great for a medium team, not for a top one not used to be squeezed as a lemon. When he started with Juventus, the club did not win anything for a few years....after 3 years players have enough of him

______

 

Sounds like Mourinho, players get tired of him after 3 years.

[Kieran. 6,317]

27 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

Talk about underwhelmed, fuck sake Antonio Conte? I mean really? If we are considering someone like him then just don't bother and keep Guus for another year.

This potential arrival plus the drab outlook of the board.......Lord above fucking shoot me now.

You're gonna be surprised. Conte's a very solid manager and tactician. 

[Unionjack 7,531]

We are in a catch 22 situation. We know that getting our character/identity back is the main thing then having managers that suits US. But then we need a  manager to get us into that situation. So whoever we get we need him to think/LOVE chelsea and not just use us to play with and boost his ego.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

12 minutes ago, Kieran. said:

You're gonna be surprised. Conte's a very solid manager and tactician. 

The problem I have here is, and bare with me because I know it's a bit cliche, but he's only done it in Italy?

I know what he did with Juventus in Italy and I take nothing away from that at all. Just like I don't take it away from Guardiola despite the usual 'team of world class winners' cliche.

But this is Chelsea FC. The notion of time, patience and 'see the job out' don't exist in this club. Not going to go in-depth of whether it's a correct system or not, but if I understand correctly about Conte's approach (and even Allegri), its that you're not going to get results overnight (which contrary to what anyone says is exactly what most fans expect of us now). There's going to be a adjustment period and there's going to be times where the team will under perform for whatever reasons. And as per, we'll get an itchy trigger finger and that's another one who bites the dust.

Here's the caveat; ask me to name an alternative and I'm clueless. There's such a narrow pool of managers There are few managers who would earn the trust of Roman & his loonies to be backed through struggle and strife.

Edited February 23, 2016 by LDN Blue
Roll Thafe.

[Chelsea4 1,521]

58 minutes ago, Fernando said:

 

Sounds like Mourinho, players get tired of him after 3 years.

It's not true,he left Juventus because he had disagreements with the Juventus board.

[the wes 7,212]

Conte is currently priced 8/13 with Sky Bet to be Chelsea manager on the first day of next season.

 

 

 

5 hours ago, lucio said:

 

[the wes 7,212]

Conte likes to play with a lot of formations

[Kieran. 6,317]

2 hours ago, LDN Blue said:

The problem I have here is, and bare with me because I know it's a bit cliche, but he's only done it in Italy?

I know what he did with Juventus in Italy and I take nothing away from that at all. Just like I don't take it away from Guardiola despite the usual 'team of world class winners' cliche.

But this is Chelsea FC. The notion of time, patience and 'see the job out' don't exist in this club. Not going to go in-depth of whether it's a correct system or not, but if I understand correctly about Conte's approach (and even Allegri), its that you're not going to get results overnight (which contrary to what anyone says is exactly what most fans expect of us now). There's going to be a adjustment period and there's going to be times where the team will under perform for whatever reasons. And as per, we'll get an itchy trigger finger and that's another one who bites the dust.

Here's the caveat; ask me to name an alternative and I'm clueless. There's such a narrow pool of managers There are few managers who would earn the trust of Roman & his loonies to be backed through struggle and strife.

Who's the other alternative? Simeone? He's only done it in Spain.

[pHaRaOn 2,131]

 

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

2 hours ago, LDN Blue said:

The problem I have here is, and bare with me because I know it's a bit cliche, but he's only done it in Italy?

I know what he did with Juventus in Italy and I take nothing away from that at all. Just like I don't take it away from Guardiola despite the usual 'team of world class winners' cliche.

But this is Chelsea FC. The notion of time, patience and 'see the job out' don't exist in this club. Not going to go in-depth of whether it's a correct system or not, but if I understand correctly about Conte's approach (and even Allegri), its that you're not going to get results overnight (which contrary to what anyone says is exactly what most fans expect of us now). There's going to be a adjustment period and there's going to be times where the team will under perform for whatever reasons. And as per, we'll get an itchy trigger finger and that's another one who bites the dust.

Here's the caveat; ask me to name an alternative and I'm clueless. There's such a narrow pool of managers There are few managers who would earn the trust of Roman & his loonies to be backed through struggle and strife.

Ranieri couldn't even do it in Italy or in Spain, or even with Greece against Faroe Islands (twice). Pochettino was sacked from Espanyol after they were at the bottom of the league. Now they are 1st and 2nd in England !

 

[pHaRaOn 2,131]

Sky Sports News understands Chelsea technical director Michael Emenalo travelled to Italy on Tuesday and will be present at Juventus' Champions League last-16 tie against Bayern Munich, which Conte is also due to attend.

[Tomo 21,751]

2 hours ago, LDN Blue said:

The problem I have here is, and bare with me because I know it's a bit cliche, but he's only done it in Italy?

I know what he did with Juventus in Italy and I take nothing away from that at all. Just like I don't take it away from Guardiola despite the usual 'team of world class winners' cliche.

But this is Chelsea FC. The notion of time, patience and 'see the job out' don't exist in this club. Not going to go in-depth of whether it's a correct system or not, but if I understand correctly about Conte's approach (and even Allegri), its that you're not going to get results overnight (which contrary to what anyone says is exactly what most fans expect of us now). There's going to be a adjustment period and there's going to be times where the team will under perform for whatever reasons. And as per, we'll get an itchy trigger finger and that's another one who bites the dust.

Here's the caveat; ask me to name an alternative and I'm clueless. There's such a narrow pool of managers There are few managers who would earn the trust of Roman & his loonies to be backed through struggle and strife.

I honestly think that manager's will get time here, if they show a positive direction of what they are trying to do.

Romans itchy trigger finger is quite exaggerated in my opinion, only need to look at AVB and Jose, he held on for as long as he could with both and only pulled the trigger when he little choice.

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

Antonio Conte is the odds-on favourite to become the next Chelsea manager, following reports in Italy he has agreed a deal in principle to join the Blues in the summer.

 

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11668/10178383/antonio-conte-odds-on-favourite-to-become-new-chelsea-manager

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

How would Antonio Conte fit in at Chelsea if he became manager?

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11668/10178424/how-would-antonio-conte-fit-in-at-chelsea-if-he-became-manager

[Supermonkey92 1,428]

Conte on his 424: 

“There’s been too much talk on this particular way of playing. In actuality it’s a 4-4-2. I know of course novelty makes sometimes a great topic of discussion. If instead of saying ‘4-2-4′ I had said ‘4-4-2′ from the very beginning, we wouldn’t be discussing this ‘innovation’. Maybe all it is is just a normal idea of play. It is a normal 4-4-2. I think in England most teams that are winning are applying this type of module, which enables you to cover the playing field in the best possible way I think.”

 

Interesting, in England most teams who are winning are playing 442. Could that be our formation? 

His comments about ‘covering the playing field’ are interesting, reminiscent of Arsene Wenger’s comments (albeit now five years ago):

“I think it’s simply the most rational formation in most cases. In fact, it’s the essence of reason. With a 4-4-2, 60% of your players are occupying 60% of the pitch. No other formation is as efficient at covering space.”

this HTML class. Value is http://www.zonalmark