Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

The bid has apparently gone in for Gittens and there is big movement behind the scenes on Ekitike

Least get rid of Madueke and Jackson both frauds that should play for Tottenham at best if lucky, have no business being at top clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We cant have a young, exciting squad on low wages and sign ready made senior players. The wage structure of the team is the most important, not the age or experience of players. If we sell a highly successful purchase(Palmer/Caicedo/Cucu) we can and should get mad about it. As long as we buy young potentially great players and keep only the ones who work, we are doing a tremendous job. The squad continues to grow stronger both players individually and together as a team. It is a beautiful thing to watch and I hope it delivers silverware big time. COYB!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

 

I'm starting to think if just having Strasbourg is good enough for us. As I remember they wanted to buy more clubs. 

But I think for how we are operating it's much easier just for them to manage two teams, then 3, 4 etc etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Law - Chelsea have a belief that Pedro Neto’s numbers will get better with a full healthy season behind him, expected to stick with him; they also felt Neto gave everything every game and played in many positions, they’ve been impressed with the way he’s improved his fitness.

🔵Neto stays

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Law on strikers:

• Chelsea like Ekitike and a lot of people in Football who are hopeful and are thinking he may have a similar development path as Isak 

• Sesko seems to be steering towards Arsenal 

• Chelsea didn’t think Gyokeres was ready a year ago, maybe changed now, but high wages and his age factors 

• Jackson leaving is certainly possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For our back line i'd have a direct chat with RV see where his head is at,see if he's prepared to suck it up and play wherever the team needs him,otherwise go in hard for Hato.

As for any Branthwaite v Guehi..i like both and wouldn't say Guehi is better long term but with all variables to what getting each would cost,ramifications for rest of the squad,transfer drama etc...i'd pick Guehi..i reckon Branthwaite would be a long protracted over priced deal and block path of young players that we have that could become better.where as Guehi would be good but not at a price or age that totally blocks those paths.

Edited by Duppy Conqueror
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mkh said:

Matt Law - Chelsea have a belief that Pedro Neto’s numbers will get better with a full healthy season behind him, expected to stick with him; they also felt Neto gave everything every game and played in many positions, they’ve been impressed with the way he’s improved his fitness.

🔵Neto stays

Well i agree on this. Can’t for the life of me understand why people have hated on Neto throughout the season. He may not always produce a goal of an assist but he sure does try.. that’s half the battle with the modern player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DDA said:

Well i agree on this. Can’t for the life of me understand why people have hated on Neto throughout the season. He may not always produce a goal of an assist but he sure does try.. that’s half the battle with the modern player.

he had a slightly better season than noni

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nico Jackson can and I think WILL develop into a very nice striker. Just not an elite one. So if he’s sold I hope we don’t do so to a rival PL club where he’d have the potential to annoy us. 

Madueke, I don’t care. Just get rid. Has some nice qualities but angers me almost every game I watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thor said:

Why are we paying 80 mil for a striker that isn’t an out and out star right now? 
 

What do they see that we don’t with Etikite? 

I think strikers in the past the board previous target have come out good. So I will give them the benefit of the doubt in here. 

It's in defense that they have been woeful so that one needs more scrutiny. Hence for striker let them do what they want at this point in time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...