Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Also it's very ugly what Liverpool did. Clubs don't send offers without indications that player is willing to join. We clearly had green light from Lavia camp. And our offer was just 2m bigger than Liverpool one. On the other hand after our 80m bid rejected for Caicedo they offered 111m and 30% sell on clause. So glad we took both from them now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel we need to exploit the contract length hack as much as we can this window...below is what i would try to do if poasible and have this 25 man squad

Gk - New no1, Sanchez, Bettineli

Rb - Reece, Gusto

Lb - Colwill, Maatsen

Rcb - Silva, Disasi, Fofana

Lcb - Colwill, Badiashile

Midfield - Enzo, Caicedo, Lavia, Santos, Chukwumeka

Wing and Cam - Sterling, Madueke, New Rw, Mudryk, Nkunku, New cam

St - Jackson, Broja

Sell - 170mn can be recouped

Cucurella - 40mn (Newcastle)

Chalobah - 30mn (Westham have backed out of Maguire)

Gallagher - 40mn (Westham can replace paqueta with him)

Ziyech - 10mn (Have a feeling he will go to Ajax)

Cho - 10mn (Fulham)

Lukaku - 40mn (Juventus or Saudi)

Loan -

Washington Deivid - Strasbourg

Ugochukwu - Strasbourg

Cassedei - Leicester

Hall - PL loan after new contract

Broja - wouldnt mind him going to AC Milan on loan to come back a better player next year

Buy - 145mn more to be spent

Gk - Diogo Costa - 70mn

Rw - Olise - 35mn

Cam - Kudus - 40mn (Deal involving Ziyech)

Edited by shrenshah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Reddish-Blue said:

Think the only reason for that is to help balance the books for FFP...with no-one keen on Cucurella on a permanent transfer.  Clubs will be lining up for Maatsen at the 20 million mark. 

That's short term thinking.

If we sell Maatsen for around that price then yeah it's a one-off £20M on the books profit but at the same time we'd still keep Cucurella at £18M/y total costs counting wages and amortisation. For the next five years Cucurella would cost £90M and by selling Maatsen we'd get just £20M of that sum back.

On the other hand, say we managed to get rid off Cucurella for a massive loss (maybe £25M fee) then it would obviously amount to a big on the books deficit in the short term but having a much cheaper player in Maatsen would more than save that money back over time. Sign him on a 5 year deal on £80K/wk and his total cost for the next five years would be £20M so around £70M less than Cucurella's total cost. Even if we took a one-off hit on Cucurella's amortisation value the long term benefits would still make it more than profitable.

If there's any chance Cucurella could be sold for £20-30M we should sell immediately even if it means a short term loss. His salary could prove problematic for a permanent sale though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fulham Broadway said:

Kepa Arrizabalaga reveals he wants to STAY at Real Madrid as he admits he hopes club 'keeps me'

The feeling is mutual

No chance. Once Madrid have watched him for a few months.. they will be begging us to take him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DDA said:

No chance. Once Madrid have watched him for a few months.. they will be begging us to take him back.

Good thing about him saying that is he's fucked it for coming back -he'll be sold, but the club will make a loss 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fulham Broadway said:

Good thing about him saying that is he's fucked it for coming back -he'll be sold, but the club will make a loss 

It's time to cut our losses. Sell the homegrown talent. All overrated anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

Kepa Arrizabalaga reveals he wants to STAY at Real Madrid as he admits he hopes club 'keeps me'

The feeling is mutual

WTF Kepa. He swallowed being trashed by everyone for a long time, claimed he isn't going anywhere, worked hard, tried to get himself together, acted professional and… bailed out before one had time to blink and now became los blanco in his heart before even setting foot on the pitch.

Perhaps reasonable for him, but may indicate we are still not all rosy behind the scenes, as I doubt he feared Sanchez displacing him much…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chelsea have activated £35m release clause into Michael Olise’s contract — deal advancing to final stages 🚨🔵

Clause has always been there despite denials and all parties will be in touch to finalise the agreement.

Olise already said yes to Chelsea, time to fix details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You