Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mhsc said:

That is really sad honestly, but sadly not too surprising given the FFP situation. I thought he had less than 1 year on his contract, how can we be loaning him with an obligation to buy? Or I misunderstood his contract situation?

He was offered a contract but he wanted first team minutes. You can't make everyone happy with a back up role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rumour that Maatsen might refuse the move.

Interesting if so after refusing our contract. Doubt it is about wanting to stay and become a Chelsea player sadly..probably he / his agent are thinking how much better a deal he can get as a free agent, especially in terms of a sign on fee?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mhsc said:

Rumour that Maatsen might refuse the move.

Interesting if so after refusing our contract. Doubt it is about wanting to stay and become a Chelsea player sadly..probably he / his agent are thinking how much better a deal he can get as a free agent, especially in terms of a sign on fee?

They could be maneuvering for an escape clause in case Burnley go down or something else they want. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only case for letting Maatsen go is that for some reason Poch doesn’t think he’s a LB or LWB. Why, I have no idea. 

Looks like he’d even rather play Colwill out of position there than use Maatsen. So if he’s not going to use him at LB and we’re now well stocked in attacking midfield the club may feel that there’s no place for him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mário César said:

so what do you think about selling gallagher?

If it is true that Poch really wants him / rates him (and not part of a bit of clever marketing to increase his value) then we should not unless its "fuck you money" e.g. £60m+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pizy said:

The only case for letting Maatsen go is that for some reason Poch doesn’t think he’s a LB or LWB. Why, I have no idea. 

 

 

I think the main and only case is that Maatsen has refused to sign a contract so far?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

As expected. It all comes back to he's got to sign or agree to be sold. Very sensible stance from the club tbf. Think we as fans were taking it for granted Maatsen was just going to sign and it must be some minor negotiation still going on - guess not based on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...