Jump to content

Todd Boehly Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, milka said:

Right now the focus is everywhere, but not on the pitch to win today. Young players for the future, attempts at a new stadium, all this is in perspective. If Pochettino can build a squad that holds in the top 6 and a regular presence in Europe in those years, that would be enough for Boehly and co.

Which means that in 5-6 years he will be ready to sell if his assets, in which he has invested 1 billion like young players and possibly a new stadium, prove attractive to a new buyer

So many owners, particularly in the Championship are doing the same - 'sports complexes' real estate, ground expansion as the club sits in mediocrity - as you say its all about increasing the value of their investments

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Shohei Ohtani signing with Dodgers live updates: News, analysis and reaction to $700 million deal

https://theathletic.com/live-blogs/ohtani-news-rumors-predictions-live-updates/OT60PVYWQfod/

Ohtani, Dodgers agree to 10-year, $700 million contract

Shohei Ohtani’s singular pursuit of history, one man’s quest to rewrite the baseball world’s understanding of what is possible, reached another summit on Saturday when he agreed to the largest contract in the annals of major North American team sports, a 10-year, $700 million contract with the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Ohtani announced his decision on Instagram. The deal ends years of feverish speculation about Ohtani’s future. Ohtani, a 29-year-old two-way sensation, has captivated the industry since he left Japan for Major League Baseball heading into the 2018 season. He has done things that appeared impossible in the modern era, feats that harkened back to Babe Ruth. As he traveled the country with the Los Angeles Angels this past summer, fans serenaded him with recruiting pitches. When he entered free agency, a dozen teams lined up, curious to see if they could meet his eye.

Only one team could secure Ohtani’s services. He will now be compensated for both his immense talent and his unparalleled star power. His contract eclipsed the $360 million record for free agents set last winter by New York Yankees slugger Aaron Judge and also surpassed the record-setting $426.5 million extension from Ohtani’s former Angels teammate Mike Trout. His achievement exceeded even those outside of baseball, topping the $450 million contract inked by Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes. Ohtani has outpaced even soccer star Lionel Messi’s $674 million contract — signed in 2021 when he was with FC Barcelona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fulham Broadway said:

Since Boehly arrived each point has cost £15.9 million. The most in history. Thats an expensive 0-0 draw

It has to be by some margin the most spectacular failure of a club takeover and transfer strategy in football history . Even all the sheiks were reality-conscious enough to just hand the reins to actual football ppl and confine themselves to pumping in money.

But Boehly&cos arrogance to think their moneyball Model to be so universally powerful they can just jam us into it. What they did is in fact way worse than just a collection of Uber-expensive bonkers signings like Romans Torres, Lukaku or Shevchenko brainfarts.
Instead, while spending the same absurd amount of money, we irrevocably tied the fate of this club to a wild collection of moderately talented weak minded, hyped up, immature would-be superstars based on some bogus transient stats model. By handing out retirement contracts to 20 somethings we made sure to attract the least ambitious hypeboys available instead of actually hungry  prodigies. At the same time the overall culture at the club has been degraded from a brutal but winning one to improvised slacking, slapstick and amateurism at every level which has also affected the more experienced figures carried over from the Roman era. 
But not only have boehly&co ruined the squad. The terrible results, performances and overall representation of the club in the media is rapidly chasing off the more casual fans. You see it in this forum and others but also in the social media following as well as the even more eerie atmosphere at the bridge. As a consequence, commercial revenue is bound to take a massive hit. So not only did they massively overestimate their ability on the sporting side but also failed at what they were supposed to be good at, not only eradicated most of the elite, winning principles  implanted into the dna of the club but also failed to deliver on their promises to develop it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have no interest in winning on the field. For them it is meaningless.

Their focus is to build the new stadium, to build a team with youngsters and after years when the new stadium is there they will  present this amazing product to the next buyer for max profit .

Quote

BlueCO  are inspired by RedBull. The Club will scout players , develop them over  a 3 years period before  selling them for a high prize. Strasbourg to Chelsea  will be like Salzburg to Leipzig (lequipe)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/12/2023 at 17:06, milka said:

They have no interest in winning on the field. For them it is meaningless.

Their focus is to build the new stadium, to build a team with youngsters and after years when the new stadium is there they will  present this amazing product to the next buyer for max profit .

 

This would makes sense then in selling Gallagher. 

They want to do similar with this, buy player and sell them. 

But then I have an issue, why spend 100 million on Caicedo and Enzo each? You can't sell them for more. So I see the point where they want to buy younger players play them and then sell them, but then I see they are willing to spend big on targets they want. 

So what is it? I don't know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Gallagher is on the table from what was said in January  it doesn't matter that he is our best player . They will cash out Chalobah , Maatsen etc  pure Cobham profit to balance the books .

What they did as 1bn spend, they will probably do it again in a few years by selling their already established purchases like Mudrik, Enzo, Palmer, James (if Madrid calling he is gone) whether it will be a profit or not is not clear, but they will turn the wheel once again with ''talents from all over the world'' like Leipzig do. It's just that they are not at Chelsea to build a team to win on the field now , but rather to make money mercandise , global  young product  pr nonsense  trust the process .

We have to think about why, when they had the opportunity, they did not buy elite players for half of this bn, but made a kindergarten.

 

Edited by milka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, milka said:

It's just that they are not at Chelsea to build a team to win on the field now , but rather to make money mercandise , global  young product  pr nonsense  trust the process .

I see nothing that suggest this is true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

I see nothing that suggest this is true. 

Implement Red Bull module , MultiClub project , low wage structure , development manager , players  pr nonsense  like ''we want Osimhen'' but we have limit on the wages (cannot get any top level player). Downgrade on every department in the club  like manager ,directors , players .  If they wanted to be successful, they would only chase the top level not kids .

When Abramovich came he took Peter Kenyon directly from Man U because he wanted to be at the top asap . Top manager , top director , top players  that was the level at Chelsea at the time .

 

Edited by milka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, milka said:

Implement Red Bull module , MultiClub project , low wage structure , development manager , players  pr nonsense  like ''we want Osimhen'' but we have limit on the wages (cannot get any top level player). Downgrade on every department in the club  like manager ,directors , players .  If they wanted to be successful, they would only chase the top level not kids .

Funny enough, they could at least get top talents if they want kids. They rejected Endrick to get losers like Noni Madueke and Mudryk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, TheHulk said:

Funny enough, they could at least get top talents if they want kids. They rejected Endrick to get losers like Noni Madueke and Mudryk.

Fair point . Bellingham is also a kid but proven with experience and with a salary that Ted Lasso can't give . Even the super talents we supposedly attract on the books are from mediocre clubs .  Our managment is poor , guys from  feeder clubs like Monaco and Brighton who have never been to a top club before . That's saying all ,these yankies don't have idea about football .

2023-12-24-130846.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, milka said:

Fair point . Bellingham is also a kid but proven with experience and with a salary that Ted Lasso can't give . Even the super talents we supposedly attract on the books are from mediocre clubs .  Our managment is poor , guys from  feeder clubs like Monaco and Brighton who have never been to a top club before . That's saying all ,these yankies don't have idea about football .

2023-12-24-130846.png

"This player is really good, you can SELL him"

Typo, or joke? 

I know Wyss is on a mission to bring down Chelsea’s wage bill and make it a cheap side.

But is he actually aiming to move out any quality player the club has, to make a profit? Turning it into a feeder club like Brighton?

Looks like Clearlake's master plan is just to take advantage of the club's huge fanbase, who think that the club will return to winning ways in the future, and therefore spend money on it. All the while, Clearlake is constructing a cheap side that never has a hope in hell for truly challenging the elite sides.

Edited by Blue Armour
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Blue Armour said:

"This player is really good, you can SELL him"

Typo, or joke? 

I know Wyss is on a mission to bring down Chelsea’s wage bill and make it a cheap side.

But is he actually aiming to move out any quality player the club has, to make a profit? Turning it into a feeder club like Brighton?

Looks like Clearlake's master plan is just to take advantage of the club's huge fanbase, who think that the club will return to winning ways in the future, and therefore spend money on it. All the while, Clearlake is constructing a cheap side that never has a hope in hell for truly challenging the elite sides.

I will walk away if that is truly the case (feeder club ambitions).

I will not invest my life energy into some yank billionaires for-profit schemes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...