The Sarri Thread

[1905didierblue 748]

4 minutes ago, Antonio8 said:

no at the first difficulties he should renounce to his philosophy and turn back to play in counter-attack?

for the second part of your post, I agree he is not well in the comunication field, in the men management, and he wasn't also in napoli. so it is not a surprise for me and likely for the board

who chose him 

1st? 1st sight of difficulty? We are 6th. We were a comfortable 3rd/4th at a moment in time. It's been 3-4 months of "difficulty", not the 1st sight. It's also called adaptability. Remember Antonio conte? 

So he is not good at communication,he is not good at man-managemen, he us not good at adapting. What is he good at then?

Also let's not play, "the board knew what they were getting" card. The board is clueless. This is the same board that sold Costa and matic and bougth morata and drinkwater. Same board which bought the likes of papy, Alonso, baba etc etc. The number of transfer screw ups from this boarf is legendary and it's a miracle that they are still in the job. Sarri is another of their screw ups. And it's open for all to see.

[Ayioros 76]

Sarri's problem is that he does not do the job he should.

He has very good tactical knowledge and  a very interesting vision of football.

But the fact is he should be a football tactic teacher  not a head coach from a big club.

I think i will be a great teacher and many futur coach could learn a lot from him.

His theory is great, but not always easy to put in practice.

His lack of pragmatism and his inabilty to adapt his tactics is big big problem for someone who want succes like a head coach.

If you want succes you need to adapt to your team and to your opponent.

Look at Guardiola, he has also his own philosphy but he changes constantly the tactics (change to 3 to 4 DEF, sometimes 2 attackers) or the role of his players (Def Mid become full back, or center back etc..)

He has a constant reflexion about that.

Sarri don't have this. For him its just '4-3-3', triangle passe, regista etc. And we need to keep trying until it work.

But if it doens't work , like now, we are fucked up.

It's not a coincidence if at the age of 60 he did not win anything.

 

[Antonio8 736]

1 hour ago, bakayokofan said:

1st? 1st sight of difficulty? We are 6th. We were a comfortable 3rd/4th at a moment in time. It's been 3-4 months of "difficulty", not the 1st sight. It's also called adaptability. Remember Antonio conte? 

So he is not good at communication,he is not good at man-managemen, he us not good at adapting. What is he good at then?

Also let's not play, "the board knew what they were getting" card. The board is clueless. This is the same board that sold Costa and matic and bougth morata and drinkwater. Same board which bought the likes of papy, Alonso, baba etc etc. The number of transfer screw ups from this boarf is legendary and it's a miracle that they are still in the job. Sarri is another of their screw ups. And it's open for all to see.

 his teams have identity, are well organized and play very offensive football. most of the players he trained in the past reached their pick under him. 

 

we are 6th. last year were 5th. it's the actual dimension of the club

despite that it's only 1-2 points from the 4th place so I prefer to judge at the end of the season 

 

 

[Clockwork 1,794]

20 hours ago, MoroccanBlue said:

Christensen has failed to impress when given the chance in the league. He was god awful against Wolves. 

He's so fucking soft it irritates me 

The recent game against Wolves, he was not on the pitch. His performances recently has been good even against league opposition.

He definitely deserves a start especially after watching the brainless duo of Rudiger and Luiz game after game. 

Weird to hold a player for one game in early December which I can’t recall much about it, especially when he has stringed good performances one after another lately.

Christensen is a bit soft, but he reads the game on another level than the current starting CBs.

[MoroccanBlue 5,382]

3 minutes ago, Clockwork said:

The recent game against Wolves, he was not on the pitch. His performances recently has been good even against league opposition.

Which opposition? He's played 3 games in the league. One of them was getting mugged off by Jimenez. 

Bloke is a flower against physical strikers. I'd be more comfortable had he come back during the summer bulked up. Look at Stones. 

[Fulham Broadway 17,313]

4 hours ago, Vesper said:

Blanchflower

"The great fallacy is that the game is first and last about winning. It is nothing of the kind. The game is about glory, it is about doing things in style and with a flourish, about going out and beating the lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."

The anti-Sarriball quote of all time.

You or I could give a good anti-Sariball quote. Don't know if you were a Chelsea fan under Blanchflower ? Think you are too young  but he was shite. (RIP) . We won 3 out of 15 games. 

 

 

[Fulham Broadway 17,313]

4 hours ago, Mana said:

Emery rarely got any praise. Radio and TV pundits kept on slating the man. But yesterday, he finally got the deserved praise.

Ole deserves the praise. United were 11 points behind us, now ahead of us. United shouldn't be here at all.

I'll give you Poch though.

Utd should be better with their squad, they just downed tools under the Once Special One.

It seems for a long time we've been approaching a huge crossroads where we could not carry on playing in the defensive manner we have in the last five seasons with so much reliance on individuals of the class of Fabregas, Hazard & Costa to provide and score goals.It was obvious to me that the previous level of financial resources are not available and therefore we will not compete for the best players. In order to at least maintain a position in the top six we have to change the style of play to try and keep the ball as our rivals now have the better impact players who only need one chance or one mistake by the opposition.

Personally I think he’s on the right track, we are certainly no worse than last season and will probably end up with more points. The problem has been the intensity levels but I think that is a player issue as opposed to a Sarri issue.

[MoroccanBlue 5,382]

5 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

. The problem has been the intensity levels but I think that is a player issue as opposed to a Sarri issue.

He doesn't help himself. Which is why at this point I am on the fence with him. I see how he wants us to play and I can see that with an injection in quality, we'd be way better. 

But his treatment of RLC, CHO, and Emerson leaves me banging my head against the wall. He complains about poor player performances when we have three superior players constantly on the bench. 

[Fulham Broadway 17,313]

Just now, MoroccanBlue said:

He doesn't help himself. Which is why at this point I am on the fence with him. I see how he wants us to play and I can see that with an injection in quality, we'd be way better. 

 

...and the fact he's won fuck all, which is a bit of a worry at 60

[MoroccanBlue 5,382]

2 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

...and the fact he's won fuck all, which is a bit of a worry at 60

He was one penalty away from winning his first trophy and looks to be on course making another final in the same season. Conte also had a horrid record in cup competitions and that changed. 

So long you have winners in the squad, it shouldn't be an issue. 

[Fulham Broadway 17,313]

17 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

He was one penalty away from winning his first trophy and looks to be on course making another final in the same season. Conte also had a horrid record in cup competitions and that changed. 

So long you have winners in the squad, it shouldn't be an issue. 

Lets hope he doesnt have a heart attack if he wins something

[Vesper 30,177]

1 hour ago, Fulham Broadway said:

You or I could give a good anti-Sariball quote. Don't know if you were a Chelsea fan under Blanchflower ? Think you are too young  but he was shite. (RIP) . We won 3 out of 15 games. 

 

 

he managed us 13 years before I was born, so nope, other than old videos I would have no idea, although my father said he was a shit manager, so there's that, lolol

[Antonio8 736]

interesting things in his press conference 

[1905didierblue 748]

3 hours ago, Antonio8 said:

 his teams have identity, are well organized and play very offensive football. most of the players he trained in the past reached their pick under him. 

 

we are 6th. last year were 5th. it's the actual dimension of the club

despite that it's only 1-2 points from the 4th place so I prefer to judge at the end of the season 

 

 

Identity? Hahaha

Well organized ? Hahahahahahahahah

Very offensive? Do you mean boring, pedantic football with no output?

We were 1st before that. Don't you dare forget that too. That's the difference that an actual world class manager can make. Not make a good team look like a mid table club

 

[MoroccanBlue 5,382]

Let's not use 2017 title win as a reference. We benefited massively not being in Europe and City+Liverpool weren't anything close to the animals they are now. 

Conte is better tactically however. You put Conte, Sarri, and even Guardiola to manage Burnley, no question Conte would do better than those two. 

 

[Antonio8 736]

29 minutes ago, bakayokofan said:

Identity? Hahaha

Well organized ? Hahahahahahahahah

Very offensive? Do you mean boring, pedantic football with no output?

We were 1st before that. Don't you dare forget that too. That's the difference that an actual world class manager can make. Not make a good team look like a mid table club

 

I talk about the teams he trained in the past, and if you don't know anything about italian serie A maybe you should not laugh 

1st before that. and 10th before that

 

[1905didierblue 748]

Not being in Europe helped. But let's be realistic. If Eden, Kante, luiz, Rudi, azpi, kepa, jorginho did not play a single minute of Europa so far, would not we be in the same exact position we are in Europa? With all due respect to the teams we have faced so far, our squad players and even the fringe youngsters like ampadu should have been more than good enough till this point.

Fair point about pool and city, but don't think they will be setting up any points tally records this season

[Duppy Conqueror 1,535]

we are kinda run like an Italian club..coach picks the team others pick the players to buy,club loans the shit out of anyone under 26..still classed as a young player with no need to replace them until they are around the 33 year old range.

can see why the club is attracted to Italian coaches but it`s not good to utilize the great young talent we have on our books. the club doesn`t help with them having the history they do of being ruthless and sacking 1 bad season removed from a league title and such but really I`m not sure even if they were told don`t worry about winning major trophies every year,build something for the future that they would really give under 25`s a fair run of games.

I`m not expecting it but I think we could do with throwing out the must have an impressive CV to be a candidate (I know it could be argued we did with hiring Sarri) and think outside the box,try and avoid coaches that have won with one formula.those often can have a better looking CV but look at what Low did with Germany,Southgate has done with England,Zidane with Real,OGS with Man U none of those would have had the best CV of those available.they have replaced coaches with better CV`s but had better results, they can come in and simplify things,some coaches can over complicate things,make teams rigid,force them to try and play a different way.

 

[1905didierblue 748]

8 minutes ago, Antonio8 said:

I talk about the teams he trained in the past, and if you don't know anything about italian serie A maybe you should not laugh 

1st before that. and 10th before that

 

Italian league. The same league where Alonso and Zappa were considered good players? The same league where higuain had 23 goals last season? 

If you have not checked this is not exactly serie a where you have the title decided before the season begins and the lower clubs are hardly championship level. Sarri's system has been shown to be mega flawed by the likes of wolves and totally ripped apart by others. 

 

1st before that too. 2 league titles in the last 4 seasons. Hmmm. Not bad for a "mid table" club that sarri inherited.

[Antonio8 736]

36 minutes ago, bakayokofan said:

Italian league. The same league where Alonso and Zappa were considered good players? The same league where higuain had 23 goals last season? 

If you have not checked this is not exactly serie a where you have the title decided before the season begins and the lower clubs are hardly championship level. Sarri's system has been shown to be mega flawed by the likes of wolves and totally ripped apart by others. 

 

1st before that too. 2 league titles in the last 4 seasons. Hmmm. Not bad for a "mid table" club that sarri inherited.

 except last year, thanks to sarri's napoli (look how many points has ancelotti's one)

I said that actual chelsea dimension is between 3rd and 6th place, not a mid table club

and the table suggests that, as there are 4 teams in 3 points and chelsea has the possibility to reach the top 4