Jump to content

Get Emanalo Sacked


 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, Rhino's Skin said:

I don't mind supporters making a stand...in the CPO we have one of the strongest groups in English football and the envy of many a club......but if a statement needs to be made, then lets make sure the facts are 100% correct and not based on what someone thinks.

 

I am not keen on Emanalo either and the way he speaks but there are accusations on that petition that just have not been proven.

 

Get it right.....then there would be a more united support

Not to mention an online petition won't get anything done. Showing up to the ground and voicing displeasure has much more impact. An online petition won't do anything except making the people that sign it feel like they've done something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 268
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh boy, this topic again, with the same people who are still frustrated because Mourinho and  Emenalo as the man to blame, and of course those people won't ask Abramovich to leave, since Abramovich is the reason why Mourinho was hired in the first place, but he is the reason why he was sacked weeks ago. Those people keep writing the same stuff ove and over, and same people keep "liking" those posts.

Its time to accept Mouinho is sacked for good, and Emenalo is going nowhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Leif said:

We have the most passive fans on earth. If this is the way our fanbase is going i'm popping out the champagne. It's about time our fans don't just accept dog shite on a paper plate and eat it up because there's a CFC emblem on it

we dont have the most passive fans on earth.

The CPO stand for whats rightfully belonging to the fans.

Past matches....v Man City and very recently v Sunderland show that there is a voice

Edited by Rhino's Skin
Missing words spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Fulham Broadway said:

and you had to edit that :D 

less of the abuse young man

what abuse? We have no idea how things are run behind the scenes, blaming everything people don't like on Emanalo is idiotic. What about the 4 board members, http://www.chelseafc.com/the-club/about-chelsea-football-club/club-personnel.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Leif said:

Whoever set up the petition isn't the grammatical & literal voice for all those who voted. There's nothing pathetic about him not communicating as well as Shakespeare, and there's nothing pathetic about him having his view. If you think that an opinion so many people are sharing is pathetic, you're pathetic for being that close-minded.

 

So if you say that the sky is green, then you're not stupid or pathetic because, hell, it's your opinion, right? 

In my opinion it is RETARDED (not pathetic, indeed) to claim that Emanalo caused Mourinho's leaving without having the slightest evidente of that. Some people are riding Mourinho's d*ck so hard that they're trying to find an excuse for him even after all this time. Firstly it was Eva, then the players, now it's Emanalo, tomorrow it will probably be Steve Holland and then the cleaning ladies from Stamford Bridge. But it will never be Mourinho himself, of course.

Edit: I forgot, sorry! It seems that Emanalo caused Mourinho's departure from Madrid aswell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 11Drogba said:

Guardiola works with Sammer, Simeone works with Caminero. You guys seriously think they can repeat their success here with Emenalo?

Well, until anyone supplies evidence that isn't an opinion or anecdote; yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Spike said:

Well, until anyone supplies evidence that isn't an opinion or anecdote; yes.

You mean to suggest that we can't assume that Emenalo is single handedly the issue, that only we notice and not anybody of importance of the club? That he decides every transfer alone and also decided to sack Mourinho? Preposterous, he's completely to blame...at least that's what these uninformed, ignorant morons would have us believe.

Imagine trying to get a man sacked based on absolutely nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, 11Drogba said:

So you think Emenalo is as good as Sammer or Caminero?

How the bloody hell should I or anyone know this? No person in the world can answer that question. 
 

  1. Nobody knows what Emanalo does for Chelsea exactly. Except for those that actually work at the club.
  2. What do Sammer and Caminero do at their clubs? I doubt their jobs are exactly the same given the difference in culture, monetary resources, club hierarchy and league rules.
  3. What has Emanalo done wrong?
  4. What have Sammer and Caminero done right in comparison?
  5. How can we know the relationship dynamic between the manager, the head scout and boards or each respective club?
  6. How much influence is delegated to the manager's opinion? How much to the scouts? How much to the board?

The only thing I know for sure about Emanalo is that he over sees the contract signings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 11Drogba said:

Then why did you say yes to my previous question?

Because until proven otherwise, yes he is suitable for the club. Why do you say he isn't? You are the one making the claim he isn't good enough, so supply some proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spike said:

Because until proven otherwise, yes he is suitable for the club. Why do you say he isn't? You are the one making the claim he isn't good enough, so supply some proof.

I did not claim anything. I just asked if you seriously think Guardiola and Simeone can repeat their success here. You said yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 11Drogba said:

I did not claim anything. I just asked if you seriously think Guardiola and Simeone can repeat their success here. You said yes.

You asked a serious question in a seriously condescending manner that heavily implied that Guardiola and Simeone cannot work with Emanalo. That is how it seemed, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fact remains, City went after Barcelona's ex-directors - some of which made them the club they were a few years ago. Bayern (!!!!) directors went to Barcelona to learn how they did their business establishing a philosophy and sticking with it through every new signing down to the way their academy works, spending months there to learn. RM had Zidane working for them for years, even if he was a moron (which I believe is far from the truth), his influence and respect in the world of football alone would open talks to players - for example, Hazard.

We had Emenalo instead. As if you needed more evidence that we aren't on the same level as some other top dogs.

and let's be honest, if you think this man alone got Mourinho fired, I think you're even more delusional than I initially assumed. He was the one who made the official announcement, he's one of the voices of the club to the media (one of the few or haven't you noticed we're very tight lipped on this side of London?), Mourinho getting fired was him making his own bed after dealing badly with some stuff and something that certainly came from higher people than Michael Emenalo. He's a non-factor and for as long as we keep this kind of people on our board we're in clear disadvantage. Call Mourinho all names you want, but don't ignore his brand. Our big signings during his time here mentioned HIS influence on their decision. Now we have almighty Emenalo to convince a player he should come here and not play European football instead of a figure like Zidane or Mourinho. Or the expertise of Barcelona's board. Let all the Pato's and promising American talents (!!!!) know us. I'm sure our board already have all their contacts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Spike said:

That is how it seemed, anyway.

That was not my intention. I just  have my doubts whether we provide the best assistance to our managers. It is not only about one individual. Successful Italian, German and Spanish teams are managed differently than us. That's why I think it is harder for foreign managers to repeat their success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...