Jump to content

The Hiddink Thread


MefiX19
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 1/24/2016 at 11:39 AM, Styles said:

That is extremely harsh.

Who knows what kind of football Tony Pulis would have produced with a huge budget.

Indeed. Even Hiddink seems to do alright.

On a different subject, it's really funny to see how people automatically make the link between correlation and causation - causality. I had a discussion with Henrique the other days and he said that it wasn't about the manager, but Jose had to leave. I can certainly see that certain players were fed up with him for one reason or another and have upped their performances since he left.

However, my disagreement with him was on the *needing* part: if we have no ambitions this season, as it seems to be the case, Arsenal result won't fool me (against 10 men too), would keep Jose cause us to drop or eventually he would stabilize things as he seemed to be doing? Without empowering the players as we did by sacking Jose.

I digress because that's not even the point I was going to make. Back to cause and consequence, the question is how much of the improvement is down to the individual, Hiddink, and how much is just good players getting in some sort of shape.

Hiddink's last works are nothing to write home about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

35 minutes ago, manpe said:

Hazard stays on the bench while Mikel, Matic and Ivanovic stay on the field after that first half. Coward.

How do you or anyone else on this forum how hazards fitness is.. he's played his most in a long time, he's probably not fit to play. Don't jump to conclusions based on pure assumption that hiddink just wants a draw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DANILA said:

How do you or anyone else on this forum how hazards fitness is.. he's played his first full 90 in a long time, he's probably not fit to play. Don't jump to conclusions based on pure assumption that hiddink just wants a draw.

I'm not talking about 90 minutes, I'm talking about 45 minutes. And btw, you now see the difference between with Hazard and without Hazard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody saw that that line up was going to be an issue against this team before the game, but apparently, Hiddink does not see it. Imagine getting paid millions to make shit decisions that even casual fans realize are shit decisions. Football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very disappointed with Guus today. 

Still can't get my head round it that members want him as the long-term solution for Chelsea. Let us be clear, he has been shit at all his last stints and I rate him as a caretaker for short-term but no more. I am actually pretty frustrated. The season is gone and we still watch the matches in hope that we win at Fucking Watford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...