Jump to content

Papy Djilobodji


pHaRaOn
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 765
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

15 minutes ago, the wes said:

Papy Djilobodji set to end Chelsea nightmare – Stuttgart interested [L’Equipe]

I still don't understand why we signed him. This has to be one of the most pointless transfers I've ever seen

Also, according to the L'Equipe article, Stuttgart aren't interested in buying, they want a 12-18 month loan deal 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said:

I still don't understand why we signed him. This has to be one of the most pointless transfers I've ever seen

Also, according to the L'Equipe article, Stuttgart aren't interested in buying, they want a 12-18 month loan deal 

 

Because we failed in our targers and needed an emergency player just jncase of a crisis.

17 minutes ago, nyikolajevics said:

At least give him one fucking game :D This weekend is a good opportunity.

He got some minutes against Walsall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tomo said:

 

He got some minutes against Walsall.

 

Yeah like one minute, didn't even touch the ball.

 

I would really love to see him tomorrow, I've been hungry for some Papy-time for months.

 

DJILOBODJI CHELSEA LEGEND

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tomo said:

Because we failed in our targers and needed an emergency player just jncase of a crisis.

He got some minutes against Walsall.

If we needed an emergency player, we could have asked Middlesbrough to terminate the Kalas loan deal (like Liverpool are doing with their loaned out players due to significant injuries in their first team)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Reddish-Blue said:

If we needed an emergency player, we could have asked Middlesbrough to terminate the Kalas loan deal (like Liverpool are doing with their loaned out players due to significant injuries in their first team)

Maybe we did and Kalas didn't want to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/01/2016 at 9:14 AM, Tomo said:

Because we failed in our targers and needed an emergency player just jncase of a crisis.

He got some minutes against Walsall.

If I'm not mistaken, he got 62 seconds.

 

Therefore we've paid Nantes £43548.39 per second that he appeared for us. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You