Jump to content

Anthony Martial


Pacquiao
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Im not sure why is there such halo here...

That money is no worse than 40m that we almost paid for Stones. Yet no one cared.

Double standards at best. When we go after player, no problem pay world record fee for a everton 21year old CB who had one good season in PL, while united goes for a unproven striker for 55m, the world gone mad, united is breaking all the rules blah blah. And vice versa from other fans.

For record I think this price for Martial is waay too high, but so was the rumoured one for Stones.

At least Martial is a forward.

That's not accurate. Lot's of people were unhappy with the fee rumoured to have been offered for Stones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disgusting to see the media overshadow the price tag by overhyping him. Somehow this is a good deal because he seems to be the next Henry. FFS man, had we bought him it would have been a different scene.

Overpaid. He will be good, but next Henry? No way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You