Jump to content

Charles Aranguiz


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

i did not mention witsel.

as far as turan goes, his agent said that they were in contact with chelsea and 3 days later said that there never was any club except for barca. so i dont know what to think there.

aranguiz thing has been going on as well as baba.

I mentioned Witsel because we're talking CM. Aranguiz really had no concrete links from reputable sources. Even the poster here from Chile said all the talk was coming from some English sources, which themselves were regurgitating the stuff from that Marseille account or whatever it was, which was picked up by the likes of Metro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 262
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think that Jose could be making a small mistake (it would not be a terrible mistake) if he thinks that we do not need sign a creative player. In our squad we have only Fabregas as Playmaker, as a creative player.

Obviously Hazard is a creative player, but he is something different (and special).

I'm talking about players who can move the team on the pitch like a compass. And I think it would be dangerous to rely on a profound change in the performance of Oscar or that we depend of a great player like Ruben Loftus-Cheek, but a player who still has 19 years.

I believe that Aranguiz would be a good solution for this problem. A player able to be the natural replacement for Fabregas when he needs rest or for playing near to Matic. And Aranguiz would not be a very expensive signing.

I think that would be a small mistake if we do not sign a creative player. But not a dramatic mistake (by the way).

Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Jose could be making a small mistake (it would not be a terrible mistake) if he thinks that we do not need sign a creative player. In our squad we have only Fabregas as Playmaker, as a creative player.

Obviously Hazard is a creative player, but he is something different (and special).

I'm talking about players who can move the team on the pitch like a compass. And I think it would be dangerous to rely on a profound change in the performance of Oscar or that we depend of a great player like Ruben Loftus-Cheek, but a player who still has 19 years.

I believe that Aranguiz would be a good solution for this problem. A player able to be the natural replacement for Fabregas when he needs rest or for playing near to Matic. And Aranguiz would not be a very expensive signing.

I think that would be a small mistake if we do not sign a creative player. But not a dramatic mistake (by the way).

Regards.

Exactly. When it becomes a mistake, is when fabregas or hazard goes off injured then we have to depend on willian and ramires to create chances for us.

Mourinho has completely forgot about the term injury.. When it comes, our team is not prepared for the consequences.

Costa getting injured and never completing 2-3 straight matches from February till may and we couldn't score goals anymore.

I'm hoping we don't have any injuries to our starting lineup because our bench midfielders options are crap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Jose could be making a small mistake (it would not be a terrible mistake) if he thinks that we do not need sign a creative player. In our squad we have only Fabregas as Playmaker, as a creative player.

Obviously Hazard is a creative player, but he is something different (and special).

I'm talking about players who can move the team on the pitch like a compass. And I think it would be dangerous to rely on a profound change in the performance of Oscar or that we depend of a great player like Ruben Loftus-Cheek, but a player who still has 19 years.

I believe that Aranguiz would be a good solution for this problem. A player able to be the natural replacement for Fabregas when he needs rest or for playing near to Matic. And Aranguiz would not be a very expensive signing.

I think that would be a small mistake if we do not sign a creative player. But not a dramatic mistake (by the way).

Regards.

It may be a mistake with mild consequences in the premier league, but it would greatly undermine our chances in Europe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned Witsel because we're talking CM. Aranguiz really had no concrete links from reputable sources. Even the poster here from Chile said all the talk was coming from some English sources, which themselves were regurgitating the stuff from that Marseille account or whatever it was, which was picked up by the likes of Metro.

Begovic and our skimping was definitely from reputable sources.

And as I said, there is never smoke without fire. What's even more baffling is that there is the same genral pattern in all of those rumors of trying to skimp our way thru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh ok. Maybe there's hope yet... But with mikel now staying I'm not sure any reinforcements are coming

mourinho hinted hes happy with the six midfielders hes got the only way he would sign a midfielder if one the six midfielders wanted to leave the club

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can have six midfielders, but only Fabregas is a creative player with ability to move the team like a compass.

And Aranguiz could be that player. A player with experience and personality, which would not be very expensive (no more than 10 million pounds) and he could play with Fabregas or to give him rest.

We can not let Fabregas alone in the creative aspects. Oscar and RLC are players with ability to play as N.10. Mikel, Ramires and Matic (the perfect player) are players with a lot of physical ability but they can not lead a team creatively like Fabregas.

That's why I want that Aranguiz come back to our list of rumors and finally we can sign him. He is the piece we need.

Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and without aranguiz, our midfiled actually very poor in my opinion

ramirez and mikel, both player is someone we cant rely anything when important time comes

mikel - only useful when we choose to closed down the game and playing very coward and safe

ramires - only giving, energy and athletism but often abysimal on the ball

even our best midfield in matic - fabregas only able to show excellent display in consistent basis when facing poor team and setup their tactic to sitback

even poor team, if they choose to press our midfield consistently, our midfield is often failing apart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and without aranguiz, our midfiled actually very poor in my opinion

ramirez and mikel, both player is someone we cant rely anything when important time comes

mikel - only useful when we choose to closed down the game and playing very coward and safe

ramires - only giving, energy and athletism but often abysimal on the ball

even our best midfield in matic - fabregas only able to show excellent display in consistent basis when facing poor team and setup their tactic to sitback

even poor team, if they choose to press our midfield consistently, our midfield is often failing apart

I wish everyone can see this view. This is exactly the true weakness of our team we can improve on. Getting midfielders who are excellent under pressure, and another creative player incase fabregas or hazard injures would go a long way in improving the team.

But we are still a strong team tbh, it's just that I like improvement season after season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You