Jump to content

Juan Cuadrado


Liuxas
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 21/01/2015 at 04:10, LAM09 said:

True, but if you have an opinion it should be based on something worthwhile. Highlight reels aren't ideal.

My loyalty to Salah is mainly to do with him being wasted, but I would have the same discussion in Schurrle's thread if he wasn't playing. I would have no problem with Salah waiting for his chance (if it ever comes) if he had Reus, Bale, Robben on our right wing, but we have bloody Willian.

I will post this quote again, as this is the reason Willian gets a bye.

A name counts for more than the statistics.

To be honest, if Willian didn't start today we would have lost the game. Yes his attacking needs to improve quite a fair bit but with Ivanovic thinking he's a winger, Willian covers for him very effectively. And to be fair none of our attacking players today were good enough, let alone the whole team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  On 21/01/2015 at 04:15, LAM09 said:

That isn't the reason, and most of us (who have our eyes open) know it.

I'll end this pointless discussion now, as I can't be bothered talking about something your clearly unaware of.

LOL..... ITS A CONSPIRACY!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 21/01/2015 at 04:16, Chelsea Legend 11 said:

Hhahahahaha So now Willian, a guy who just barely got into Brazil last year and before that was in exile in Russia is a bigger name then Schurrle who won a World Cup? You're embarrassing yourself.... Jose is loyal to those who are loyal to him. You show loyalty by going out and doing the job you're instructed to do. Salah has been invisible in the games he's played in, mostly against league one and championship sides. If you can't do a job against that lot what makes you think the manager is gonna trust you to do a job against better teams? You have to earn that distinction its not gonna be given to you.

Willian cost £30m. ;)

I agree, Salah is useless against the bigger teams. What was his record against us?

Adiós!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 21/01/2015 at 04:16, Beepu said:

To be honest, if Willian didn't start today we would have lost the game. Yes his attacking needs to improve quite a fair bit but with Ivanovic thinking he's a winger, Willian covers for him very effectively. And to be fair none of our attacking players today were good enough, let alone the whole team.

Iva is told to attack by the manager, and isn't a player like Dani Alves with an attacking nature. I have nothing against Willian as a person, but he offers no attacking threat as I have reiterated countless times. I want a RWF not a RWB. Simple as!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 21/01/2015 at 04:19, LAM09 said:

Willian cost £30m. ;)

I agree, Salah is useless against the bigger teams. What was his record against us?

Adiós!

Torres cost 50m, what is your point? Eto'o played more than him.

Zouma cost more than Cahill.

Remy cost more than Drogba...

Hahaha this Salah love is the perfect way to cap off a frustrating day! I am literally laughing my ass off right now!

Mo Salah, the key to Chelsea winning everything! Why is Jose so blind??!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 21/01/2015 at 04:24, Chelsea Legend 11 said:

Torres cost 50m, what is your point? Eto'o played more than him.

Zouma cost more than Cahill.

Remy cost more than Drogba...

Hahaha this Salah love is the perfect way to cap off a frustrating day! I am literally laughing my ass off right now!

Mo Salah, the key to Chelsea winning everything! Why is Jose so blind??!

Eto'o was at Inter with him. Wake the hell up. Blimey!

Do you know the definition of favourite?

As I stated in a previous post, I'm against Willian as our RWF. The only reason I made a point about Salah is the fact they play in the same position, and the latter offers more on the front foot, IMO. If we had better options, I wouldn't say a word.

Either way, this is Juan's thread. Leave it at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 21/01/2015 at 04:29, LAM09 said:

Eto'o was at Inter with him. Wake the hell up. Blimey!

Do you know the definition of favourite?

As I stated in a previous post, I'm against Willian as our RWF. The only reason I made a point about Salah is the fact they play in the same position, and offers more on the front foot, IMO. If we had better options, I wouldn't say a word.

Either way, this is Juan's thread. Leave it at that.

So what is it then the money or the trust? ahahaha this is so good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Willian isn't the solution at RW, its clear neither is Schurrle or Salah. We wouldn't be looking at Cuadrado if any of them provided us with exactly what we need at RW. If you're looking for a pecking order its this

1. Willian because he works hard for the team and is good at recycling possession. Needs more end product but tactically he is always spot on.

2. Schurrle because he's good on the counter attack and can score from time to time. He's a terrible decision maker, doesn't play with the team.

3. Salah because he can stretch a defense....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 21/01/2015 at 00:25, Chelsea Legend 11 said:

Its up to them though. If they don't work hard and give Jose decisions to make then they aren't good enough

That isn't always necessarily the case. Mourinho has his preferences and if he doesn't fancy you too much, then you are unlikely going to get a lot of game time.

  On 21/01/2015 at 00:10, DanishBlue said:

well, if we can sell Schurrle for 23 and buy Cuadrado for 27 then it would be a cheap upgrade tbf.

It may look like a cheap upgrade but comparison aside, is Cuadrado really an upgrade to our side? Can he help us to solve our issues on the RW? If not, then spending 27million on him is a waste of money.

  On 21/01/2015 at 00:13, Chelsea Legend 11 said:

For whatever reason Schurrle hasn't lived up to his squad player winger status... He doesn't work well with this group of players.

To say Schurrle doesn't work well the players is a tad off. With the main inclusion of Fabregas and Costa aside, we pretty much have the same squad as last season and Schurrle worked well with them then and even in the earlier parts of this season. It was only when he got the mystery illness (god knows what happened there) and recovered that things just went completely wrong for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday hazard was nullified by markovic and can on the left side.

But I never expect any quality action play from our right wing so I knew our attacking play was gone as Hazard was having a poor time.

He needs the other winger to take some burden off his shoulders and cuadrado is better than the rest of our right wingers at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 21/01/2015 at 00:50, CHOULO19 said:

Apparently one of our shareholders, a Saudi sport economist, has hinted on his instagram account that we might be signing him... I can hardly contain my excitement!

Abramovich owns all the shares apart from 1 which is owned by Bruce Buck. Unless he means CPO shares in which case he'd know nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 21/01/2015 at 09:19, xPetrCechx said:

LInk?

https://twitter.com/thibauted/status/557692657007607809

The guy seems like a legit shareholder or at least business partner of some kind. But that does not at all imply that he has any knowledge of whom we are buying. He's even removed the photo since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Juan Cuadrado is not a Galactico as Reus, Reus but probably will sign by Bayern and Real Madrid (Real Madrid does not care the Financial Fair Play), and we need a winger because neither Salah (he never played) or Schurrle (he is not a winger) can play in our starting eleven.

If finally the price is £ 20 million maybe it's a good option. Would give us something different.

According Express, Cuadrado was yesterday in Anfied Road, invited by Adidas and Chelsea.

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/553273/Juan-Cuadrado-Chelsea-gossip

Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 21/01/2015 at 09:34, We Hate Scouse said:

Abramovich owns all the shares apart from 1 which is owned by Bruce Buck. Unless he means CPO shares in which case he'd know nothing.

Maybe not. I checked him out, he's one of the owners/financiers of Al Hilal club in KSA and he there are pictures of him and little pieces of new in Saudi sites about him becoming something of business partner or shareholder in the club and being handed some sort of recognition award for it last season at HT at the Norwich game at the Bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 21/01/2015 at 09:47, CHOULO19 said:

Maybe not. I checked him out, he's one of the owners/financiers of Al Hilal club in KSA and he there are pictures of him and little pieces of new in Saudi sites about him becoming something of business partner or shareholder in the club and being handed some sort of recognition award for it last season at HT at the Norwich game at the Bridge.

Looking at his Insta he just seems like an average fan that runs a Supporters Group. The recognition award was for getting the supporters group platinum membership. He definitely doesn't have shares in Chelsea FC PLC. I'm 100% certain of that. It probably just is the CPO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You