Jump to content

Fabinho


supporter
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Panic said:

I don't think it's even about ambition. It's about competence. they paid 44 for Fabinho we paid 40 for Baka. Let that sink in.

 

7 minutes ago, DDA said:

It hurts. It really does hurt. 

Looking forward to the Fabinho v Bakayoko comparisons next season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

1 minute ago, Jason said:

 

Looking forward to the Fabinho v Bakayoko comparisons next season...

Don't go there Jason. I'm refreshing my Chelsea transfer google search repetitively like a crack head, hoping for some news that we have got Bale, Jorginho or Fekir. My eyes burn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DDA said:

Don't go there Jason. I'm refreshing my Chelsea transfer google search repetitively like a crack head, hoping for some news that we have got Bale, Jorginho or Fekir. My eyes burn.

Just stop mate..... waiting for nike deal to happen yet lmao 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Liverpool board giving Klopp every target he wants. Must be nice.

Yep!! Though there's no point Conte having targets as looks likely to be off.. Gotta get that sorted first. Once again! 

It'll be a normal window for us... Linked... Nothing then buy some randomer near the end. 

Theyre definitely gana challenge next year. If not.. Oh dear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, DDA said:

Don't go there Jason. I'm refreshing my Chelsea transfer google search repetitively like a crack head, hoping for some news that we have got Bale, Jorginho or Fekir. My eyes burn.

I just have this floating is a seperate tab. Guves all the options you want

http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Football/Premier+League/Chelsea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, The Skipper said:

Ambition and competence go hand in hand. 

To a certain extent, but look at Liverpool's transfers over the least few years. In the last 3 years they have a net spend of just £18m(pre-Fabinho buy). They sold both Suarez and Coutinho when Barca came calling. Even if they go on a spending spree this summer, Chelsea will still have outspent them come the end of the summer. Their intelligent transfer dealings have allowed them to spend big on needed positions(Van Dijk for £75m and Keita for £58m) without requiring the club to spend money out of their own pockets. The reason Chelsea can't do the same is because we went out and spent £65m on 3 players who only played in cup games and emergencies.( Barkley, Emerson, Drinkwater) I don't think Liverpool have greater ambitions than we do, they just know what they're doing in the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Laylabelle said:

Yep!! Though there's no point Conte having targets as looks likely to be off.. Gotta get that sorted first. Once again! 

It'll be a normal window for us... Linked... Nothing then buy some randomer near the end. 

Theyre definitely gana challenge next year. If not.. Oh dear. 

I'd like to think we learned our lesson after twice having terrible summers in recent years but it seems we haven't. Known for months that Conte is off and still no update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pizy said:

I'd like to think we learned our lesson after twice having terrible summers in recent years but it seems we haven't. Known for months that Conte is off and still no update.

And we ain't got as long to piss around this time either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panic said:

To a certain extent, but look at Liverpool's transfers over the least few years. In the last 3 years they have a net spend of just £18m(pre-Fabinho buy). They sold both Suarez and Coutinho when Barca came calling. Even if they go on a spending spree this summer, Chelsea will still have outspent them come the end of the summer. Their intelligent transfer dealings have allowed them to spend big on needed positions(Van Dijk for £75m and Keita for £58m) without requiring the club to spend money out of their own pockets. The reason Chelsea can't do the same is because we went out and spent £65m on 3 players who only played in cup games and emergencies.( Barkley, Emerson, Drinkwater) I don't think Liverpool have greater ambitions than we do, they just know what they're doing in the market.

I’m not disagreeing with that - a valid point but that’s where ambition also comes in. Their whole attacking football philosophy that they’re trying to embed into the club... the fact that now they’re getting some top players to believe in this project (Keita and Fabinho are top top signings) - that’s where ambition comes into it. Making smart signings is also a sign of ambition. Hence why competence and ambition go hand in hand. Don’t forget that our net spend over the last few seasons is ridiculously low compared to the likes of Utd and City too for example, so we can also say that our ambition in that sense has dropped given that we used to be on par with both. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...