Jump to content

Diego Costa


Spike
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, The Skipper said:

He was injured lots throughout the second half of the season last year, so that stopped his momentum. He still had a 1 in 2 goal ratio back then though. He wasn't amazing but he was decent. Not sub par though. 

I can say Costa is consistent usually because of how consistent he was at Atletico and how he was here last season for the most of it. Now he's gone through a very bad patch for the first time in years... With obvious reasons as to why... It's unfair to call him inconsistent. He's been our most consistent player under Hiddink whether you like that or not. 

Getting another top striker in to compete with Diego is entirely another argument tbh. I'm not disagreeing with you on that. 

The reoccurring injuries are part of his inconsistencies and why we need to get another top striker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CHOULO19 said:

The reoccurring injuries are part of his inconsistencies and why we need to get another top striker. 

And which top striker is willing to sit on the bench until Costa is injured? We all know Costa wont stay happy on the bench. We need the Pato's and Remy's unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Polo7 said:

And which top striker is willing to sit on the bench until Costa is injured? We all know Costa wont stay happy on the bench. We need the Pato's and Remy's unfortunately.

Costa has many limitations, so we can easily have two types of strikers and keep them both happy a la Torres and Ba under Rafa (but hope fully A LOT better). We can have for example a Cavani who can hold up and a ball and be the focal point of attacks and start him in game when we need such skills while playing Costa in game when we need  a lot of movement and runs behind.

Or we can bin Costa, which as I said, I wouldn't at all mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Barbara said:

Two top strikers won't be happy taking turns. The two you mentioned aren't even slightly on the same level as Costa. Even with the eventual injury or suspension he's been capital for the title, much better return than all potentially available strikers in the market.

Costa is underrated on his ability to score goals. He went through a bit of drought, any player is subjected to that. Even missing matches he takes us to a new level 7 goals/assists in five matches is one of the reasons we reacted in the league...

Even Aguero, the best striker in the league which most people agree with has his droughts where he sometimes goes 5-6 games without scoring. Costa is no different. But when they are on form, they really are on form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Stats said:

Even Aguero, the best striker in the league which most people agree with has his droughts where he sometimes goes 5-6 games without scoring. Costa is no different. But when they are on form, they really are on form.

Paq got a lot of stick for sayjng Costa is the second best striker in the world and while he may have exaggarted with second, there is a strong case for Diego being 4th behind Aguero, Suarez and Lewa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2016 at 11:24 PM, Barbara said:

Two top strikers won't be happy taking turns. The two you mentioned aren't even slightly on the same level as Costa. Even with the eventual injury or suspension he's been capital for the title, much better return than all potentially available strikers in the market.

Costa is underrated on his ability to score goals. He went through a bit of drought, any player is subjected to that. Even missing matches he takes us to a new level 7 goals/assists in five matches is one of the reasons we reacted in the league...

Then that brings me back to my original point that we need to sell him because our team performances are too reliant on him.

The problem with Costa, aside from attitude and tendencies to act like a right prick at times, is that all he brings is goals. His technical ability on the ball is largely poor (except when finishing obviously), his dribbling..................................his passing is erratic at times and for a big bully he can often be muscled off the ball too easily.

So when the goals dry up, we basically play with a man less in attack.

 

21 hours ago, Henrique said:

I completely disagree. Nothing wrong in being "very emotional", I don't understand how thats a negative thing, specially when you talking about a very emotional game like football. Can you explain how being emotional is unprofessional? Costa is a leader, is the kind of guy that can change the team's spirit. He is eaily our most important player in post-Mourinho era.

I won't talk about his first 16 league games of this season, since its clear at this point that he had problems with Mourinho that were affecting his perfomances. 

Seriously? You want proof how Costa is unprofessional? Have you even watched him play for us?!

Costa is NOT a leader. I wouldn't give him the armband if he was the last man in the team. Leaders are role models. They set an example for the rest of the team to follow. They don't elbow and stomp on opposition players and they don't get themselves needlessly into trouble in almost every single game. 

Take the blue tinted glasses off for a second, there are probably youth coaches showing kids videos of Costa as a guide for how NOT to act on a football pitch! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2016 at 9:03 AM, Tomo said:

Paq got a lot of stick for sayjng Costa is the second best striker in the world and while he may have exaggarted with second, there is a strong case for Diego being 4th behind Aguero, Suarez and Lewa.

I would say Suarez and Aguero (top-tier) then Lewa, Costa and Benzema. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DYC. said:

The change of opinion on Costa is astounding.

It is. Football is a fickle game. Personally, I've always overlooked Costa's poor start to the season because the team was completely not good enough in general. Same way I'm overlooking Eden's poor form. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/01/2016 at 1:23 AM, The Skipper said:

It is. Football is a fickle game. Personally, I've always overlooked Costa's poor start to the season because the team was completely not good enough in general. Same way I'm overlooking Eden's poor form. 

 

I agree, but only with your point regarding Diego. 

 

You can excuse the striker for cutting an isolated figure when the midfield behind him can boast the same inventiveness and incisiveness that a three year-old could. But that is the issue - Hazard has been, all season, akin to that three year-old midfielder. He looks absolutely useless at everything he attempts. There is an obvious crisis of confidence and the only conclusion I can come to is that the boy's heart isn't at Chelsea. He seems to have lost his hunger, whilst Diego has had his reinvigorated. I'm not holding out for a similar transformation by Eden. 

 

But anyway, this is Diego's thread. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You