Rumoured Ezequiel Lavezzi

[Mustafa 885]

Damn.. he's 29 years old !! Unless we are getting him really cheap, then this is a no-brainer

[Hamilton 2,120]

Liverpool offered 23m€ according to rumoures

[Special Juan 28,091]

Liverpool should just place a bid for every cunt and be done with it.

[The Chels 2,502]

I don't rate him at all. Hard-working but would add nothing new.

[Fulham Broadway 17,299]

Interesting holiday snaps.....thought it was Hitzelberger first of all

[TheIceMan 596]

Interesting holiday snaps.....thought it was Hitzelberger first of all

I guess, it's easy to be confused in nowadays, with all that piercings tattoos, and haircuts!

[Vybz Kartel 1,613]

This guy is an absolute work horse, we should go for him to solve our right wing problems

[BlueLyon 9,359]

He was great in napoli but couldnt get more average in psg...

[ChelseaFanUK 1,014]

He was great in napoli but couldnt get more average in psg...

Tbh half the players who went to PSG went for the cash, not because they wanted to play for them. Put Lavezzi back in Napoli hed be a different player. Same with Cavani if he came to prem, or la liga etc

[communicate 2,703]

No thanks. Work hard, brilliant off the ball but his final delivery is horrible

[didierforever 7,349]

No thanks. Work hard, brilliant off the ball but his final delivery is horrible

still better than schurrle (specially if he is sold) or willian.

[Jase 43,479]

Tbh half the players who went to PSG went for the cash, not because they wanted to play for them. Put Lavezzi back in Napoli hed be a different player. Same with Cavani if he came to prem, or la liga etc

That may be true but it's not exactly a valid excuse, is it? What does it say about the player if he can't perform at a club with ambition to be one of the best but can only do so at a 2nd/3rd tier club?

Not to mention, Lavezzi is 30 years old this year (supposedly to be at his peak) and yet has hardly been consistent since his Napoli days. If we are going to buy a new RW, would rather wait till the summer than waste money on him.

[We Hate Scouse 10,326]

still better than schurrle (specially if he is sold) or willian.

Hardly better than Willian. He's a work horse with no end product. It would not solve our RW issues whatsoever.

[didierforever 7,349]

Hardly better than Willian. He's a work horse with no end product. It would not solve our RW issues whatsoever.

his product is poor but he is a much more direct player than willian. willian's driblling is like mikel's passing - sideways.we can literally count the no. of times that willian's dribbling has created an oppurtunity. lavezzi is a very good dribbler along with a brilliant work rate. a marginal but an upgrade over willian. also, if the rumored fee of 10mil is true and if schurrle's rumored fee anf transer has an ounce of truth to it, we should not even think twice.

PS - still waiting for your "big news". i think the whole forum is!!!

[iseah100 5,612]

NOOOOOOO